WHEN President Bill Clinton pardoned a billionaire fugitive from justice on his last day in office, even usually loyal Democrats were dismayed. Representative Henry Waxman of California called it “bad precedent” and “an end run around the judicial process.” He said it appeared to set a double standard for the wealthy and powerful.
The billionaire was Marc Rich, a commodities trader, and his pardon is a subject of discussion again because Eric Holder, Mr. Clinton’s deputy attorney general at the time and a key figure in the clemency process, is reported to be Barack Obama’s choice for attorney general. In the years since the Rich pardon, Mr. Holder has said he “never devoted a great deal of time to this matter.” He also told an interviewer that, in hindsight, he wished that the Justice Department had been “more fully informed” about the case. As someone who helped cover the story for The Washington Post, I think the issue is far more complicated and deserves more scrutiny if Mr. Holder is to become our top law-enforcement official.
...[Mr. Holder] brokered one of the most unjustifiable pardons that an American president has ever granted.
"Stand with anybody that stands RIGHT. Stand with him while he is right and PART with him when he goes wrong." --Abraham Lincoln
▼
Sunday, November 23, 2008
Eric Holder Discusses Pardon of Marc Rich
From a New York Times op-ed piece by George Lardner Jr.:
Holder is like a gift to the Republicans. But these Clinton people stick together like glue so they aren't going to throw one of their own overboard.
ReplyDeleteWith the third term of the Clinton Presidency getting ready to take office, it looks like Obama is going to be even more of a eunuch President than I originally thought.
Maybe Jesse Jackson will do the honors, "I wanna cut Obama's nuts off."
ReplyDeleteThis is a shaping up like a Clinton third term.
ReplyDeleteThank God Obama hasn't brought back Madeleine Albright.