Saturday, January 31, 2009

Springsteen Super Bowl T-Shirts



SPRINGSTEEN T-SHIRTS!

GET YOUR SPRINGSTEEN SUPER BOWL T-SHIRTS HERE!

SPRINGSTEEN COLLECTIBLE T-SHIRTS!




This is capitalism. Bruce Springsteen is a capitalist.

Makes his socialist preaching seem sort of insincere, doesn't it?

$27.95 plus shipping for a t-shirt is a lot for a blue-collar, working class guy to pay.

Maybe Springsteen should do more than speak out on behalf of the little guy. Maybe he should give his fans a break. He could pocket less profit and make the t-shirts available at cost.


Spread the wealth around.




Just 1 day until BS hits the stage!
__________________

Springsteen calls Wal-Mart CD deal a mistake

From the New York Times:

While his latest seven-album contract with Columbia Records is worth a reported $110 million, he still comes across as a working-class guy from New Jersey, invoking a compassionate populism as he sings about jobs, families and everyday life and savors the company of his longtime buddies in the E Street Band. He has the gravitas to lead off an inaugural concert and the gusto to rock the Super Bowl. In between he released a new studio album, “Working on a Dream.”

He comes across as a working-class guy?

Really? Maybe he seems that way to those disconnected from reality.

... On Jan. 13 a $10 collection of Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band’s “Greatest Hits” — 11 songs from a 1995 hits anthology, as well as “Radio Nowhere” from “Magic” — went on sale exclusively at Wal-Mart. Since Wal-Mart has been accused of anti-union practices by Human Rights Watch, among others, and has paid large fines for violating labor laws, the announcement prompted online criticisms like the one from asroma on the fan site backstreets.com: “Bruce is doing biz with Wal-Mart? Kind of goes against everything he stands for.”

In an interview with Billboard, Mr. Springsteen’s manager, Jon Landau, defended the release, saying Mr. Springsteen’s albums were already in Wal-Mart, which accounts for 15 percent of his sales. He also said: “We’re not doing any advertising for Wal-Mart. We haven’t endorsed Wal-Mart or anybody else. We’re letting Sony do its job.”

But Mr. Springsteen said the decision was made too hastily. “We were in the middle of doing a lot of things, it kind of came down and, really, we didn’t vet it the way we usually do,” he said. “We just dropped the ball on it.” Instead of offering the exclusive collection to Wal-Mart, “given its labor history, it was something that if we’d thought about it a little longer, we’d have done something different.” He added, “It was a mistake. Our batting average is usually very good, but we missed that one. Fans will call you on that stuff, as it should be.”

"[W]e didn’t vet it the way we usually do."

"Vet"?

Oh, good grief.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please select an account option or provide a name/URL.

Comments including excessive profanity, harassment, and abusiveness will NOT be published.