The President's radio address was priceless. I wonder if the Architect had a hand in it.
Bush challenged Dems to behave like Republicans in the confirmation process of his Supreme Court nominee.
(Excerpt)
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Under the Constitution, I have the responsibility to nominate a successor to Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. This past week I met with Democratic and Republican leaders in the United States Senate and sought their views on the process, and their thoughts on the qualities to look for in a potential nominee. Also, my staff has talked with more than 60 members of the United States Senate. Members of the Senate are receiving a full opportunity to provide their opinions and recommendations, and I appreciate their advice.
I will be guided by clear principles as I make my decision. My nominee will be a fair-minded individual who represents the mainstream of American law and American values. The nominee will meet the highest standards of intellect, character, and ability, and will pledge to faithfully interpret the Constitution and laws of our country. Our nation deserves, and I will select, a Supreme Court justice that Americans can be proud of.
The American people also expect a Senate confirmation process that rises above partisanship. When I met with Senate leaders, we discussed our shared goal of making sure that the confirmation process is dignified. The nominee deserves fair treatment, a fair hearing, and a fair vote. I will make my nomination in a timely manner so the nominee can be confirmed before the start of the Court's new term in October.
The experiences of the two justices nominated by President Clinton provide useful examples of fair treatment and a reasonable timetable for Senate action. In 1993, the Senate voted on and confirmed Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the Supreme Court 42 days after President Clinton submitted her nomination. And despite the significant philosophical differences many senators had with Justice Ginsburg, she received 96 votes in favor of confirmation.
The following year, Justice Stephen Breyer was confirmed 73 days after his nomination was submitted, with 87 votes in his favor. Again, Republican senators in large numbers voted for confirmation of Justice Breyer despite significant philosophical differences. These examples show that the thorough consideration of a nominee does not require months of delay.
Will the Dems conduct themselves in a civilized fashion, as the Republicans did in confirming Clinton's nominees to the Supreme Court?
Not a chance.
As Chuckie Schumer said, they're at war.
Expect the Dems to Bork ANY nominee Bush offers.
Expect them to lose more seats in the House and Senate in 2006 as a result.
Saturday, July 16, 2005
Bush's Radio Address
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
As long as the Democrats are going to filibuster anyone President Bush nominates anyway, I have a suggestion as to who he should choose.
Judge Roy Moore of Alabama.
He would not be my choice if I were the president. I would be too afraid that he would be as much an activist judge as whatever Liberal judge the Democrats would approve, only to the other extreme.
Ideally, the next appointee would ne a judge, not a legislator. A judge that would interpret the constitution, not add to it.
I like your blog. I read as much as I had time to read, and will come back. in fact, I am going to link it to my blog.
You have stated most of the things that I want to say on mine, and have, but much more eloquently than I.
If you decide to visit my blog, be sure to visit my July 2nd post, if no other. It is, I feel, my best effort. And it describes the reason I felt the need to express myself through the media of blogging.
Thank you, Mark!
I'll be sure to check out your blog.
Post a Comment