Sunday, March 18, 2012

Marquette - Sweet Sixteen

Marquette's Sweet Repeat!

From WISN-TV:

Jae Crowder and Darius Johnson-Odom scored 17 points apiece as the Golden Eagles advance to their second straight NCAA tournament Sweet 16.

Third-seeded Marquette (27-7) will meet Florida or Norfolk State in the West Regional semifinals.

The Golden Eagles used a late 14-2 run to overcome a five-point deficit and end the run of the sixth-seeded Racers, who finished their magical season 31-2.

Crowder scored 12 of his 17 in the second half and also had 13 rebounds and four steals. It was Crowder's fifth straight double-double.

Marquette trailed 46-41 with 7:21 remaining before its decisive run.

Wisconsin - Sweet Sixteen

This was a good day, Badgers!

From the Associated Press:

The Wisconsin Badgers are riding the nation's stingiest defense back to the round of 16.

The Badgers held the Southeastern Conference's two leading scorers in check Saturday night and Ryan Evans grabbed a crucial rebound with 2.1 seconds left to help Wisconsin fend off Vanderbilt 60-57 in the NCAA tournament.

John Jenkins (20.1) and Jeffery Taylor (16.3) were held to 13 and 9 points, respectively. Trailing 59-57, the Commodores had a chance for the win, but Jenkins' 3-pointer was long and Evans grabbed the rebound and was fouled with 2.1 seconds left.

Saturday, March 17, 2012

James Galway

The Corrs and The Chieftains

Flogging Molly

The Road We've Traveled (Video)

"The Road We've Traveled" is a love letter to Obama, by director Davis Guggenheim, narrated by Tom Hanks.

Are you in? https://my.barackobama.com/roadtraveledfullvid

Remember how far we've come. From Academy Award®-winning director Davis Guggenheim: "The Road We've Traveled".

This film gives an inside look at some of the tough calls President Obama made to get our country back on track. Featuring interviews from President Bill Clinton, Mayor Rahm Emanuel, Elizabeth Warren, David Axelrod, Austan Goolsbee, and more. It's a film everyone should see.

Here's the video:



This Hollywood "production" isn't going to help Obama. It's propaganda.

The road we've traveled has been a nightmare.

Everyone has lived it.

Obama has veered our country so far off track it's frightening.

Four more years?

HELL NO.




This is much closer to the truth.

HAPPY ST. PATRICK'S DAY

"Danny Boy"

Friday, March 16, 2012

Sarah Palin: Breitbart is Here

Sarah Palin has written a wonderful tribute to Andrew Breitbart.

She discusses Breitbart's fabulous new site, and then gets into his intention to properly vet Obama this time around.



The piece is a call to arms, figuratively speaking.

Palin writes:

[The media – those watchdogs of the public trust –] refused to vet Barack Obama. With tingles up their legs, they shielded him.

If the media had done their job of vetting him, we wouldn’t have been shocked that within days after Obama’s election, his close political associate Rod Blagojevich was caught trying to sell Obama’s vacant Senate seat.

If the media had done their job of vetting him, we wouldn’t be astonished to see all the billion dollar green energy kickbacks going to his campaign cronies as the nation heads towards bankruptcy.

If the media had done their job of vetting him, we wouldn’t be surprised that Obama brought these same Chicago “pay-to-play” practices to the White House.

This corruption was entirely predictable. But the mainstream media, who work under our Constitutional right of freedom of the press which our sons and daughters fight in war zones today to protect, dropped the ball and failed America by refusing to vet their chosen candidate.

So, as Breitbart declared in his last CPAC speech, we – the everyday patriotic citizens of the United States – will do the vetting the media refused to do.

This is a first step. Ultimately, Breitbart’s goal was to expose what he called the corrupt Democrat Media Complex. He wanted to break it up because he understood how the left uses its dominance of the mainstream media and pop culture to advance its objectives and marginalize its political foes.

Standing up and defending those who are being unfairly targeted and maligned was also the mission. Is it any wonder Breitbart titled his autobiography “Righteous Indignation” when you consider his deep-seated sense of justice and fair play? He was on the side of the little guy and ready to run to the aid of those who needed it. He possessed that old fashioned virtue of courage, compassion, and decency that we once called chivalry. He inspired that in others.

When you’re in the political arena serving for the right reasons and taking flak from all sides, there is nothing more discouraging then when your fellow conservatives sit on their thumbs or worse yet, join in the attacks. Breitbart understood this because he experienced it himself at times, so he was determined to stand by others in need.

He was a genius at new media, but his real gift was that he was fearless at a time when too many people are afraid and are retreating. Courage inspires courage. Fearlessness emboldens others to follow your lead.

...The task may seem daunting, but a whole new generation of conservatives has been inspired. I’ve seen it first hand. When my daughter Bristol saw the video of Breitbart’s speech at a Tea Party rally in Madison, Wisconsin, she was fired up. She turned to me and said, “Breitbart is cool!”

Yes, he is cool. And “Breitbart Is Here.”

Now let the vetting begin.

There is a new generation of conservatives ready to fight the good fight.

Bristol Palin is right. Breitbart is cool.

Being conservative is cool. And we're not going to roll over anymore.

_______________

Watch Andrew Breitbart at the February 19, 2011, Tea Party rally in Madison.



Inspired?

I hope so.

Breitbart said at the rally:

This is why we're here. It's no longer about the mainstream media. We don't need them anymore. Your cameras are going to get uploaded. Your stories are going to get uploaded... We are the modern day peace movement. This is the peace movement. (Pointing toward Leftist protesters) That's where the anarchists are... We're here to stand by this governor, doing what you voted him to do.

We aren't the anarchists.

We aren't the bullies.

We are the adults, working hard and making responsible decisions to provide a better future for ourselves and our children and their children.

We're standing by Governor Walker.

Thugs aren't going to intimidate us. The Democrat Media Complex can't silence us anymore. The New Media are spreading the word. This is what democracy looks like.

I like the way it looks.

I hope we all get out and vote AGAIN to elect Scott Walker, and refuse to allow the Leftist media, Big Labor, the government union minions, and the White House overturn OUR 2010 election.

ObamaCare: 20 Million LOSE Health Insurance

According to the Congressional Budget Office, in a worst case scenario, 20 million Americans could lose their employer-based health care plans under ObamaCare.

TWENTY MILLION!

From Politico:

A new report from the Congressional Budget Office hands critics of the health reform law a great new talking point: Under a worst-case scenario, the law could lead to 20 million people losing their employer-sponsored insurance in 2019.

The agency doesn’t think that’s likely, however. The new report, released Thursday, said the agency expects 3 million to 5 million fewer people to have employer coverage each year because of the health reform law. That’s close to the agency’s original estimate, which predicted 3 million people could lose their workplace coverage.

But the new report also lays out the worst-case scenarios and the best-case scenarios, which led to the 20 million estimate. In the best-case scenario, CBO says an increase of 3 million workers with employer insurance is possible.


OBAMA: If you like your doctor or health care plan, you can keep it.

Obama is a liar!

The guy lied to us about ObamaCare from the beginning.

No, you can't keep your doctor or health care plan.

No, you can't.

Anti-Catholic Ad, New York Times

We know the New York Times is a Leftist propaganda rag.

Now we know it's anti-Catholic as well.

From FOX News:

The New York Times is being accused of a double standard by a group of Catholic leaders who say that the newspaper showed discrimination in running an anti-Catholic ad but refusing to run a similar anti-Islam ad.

In an ad run by the atheist group Freedom From Religion, a cartoon bishop is depicted in a disparaging act. The ad reads, “it’s time to consider quitting the Catholic church.” It also blames the church for causing poverty, misery, unwanted pregnancy and debt … among other things. … cut refused one similar about islam.

After it ran last Friday, Pamela Gellar — a controversial anti-Islam activist — created an ad that mimicked it; instead of a bishop being depicted in the cartoon, it was a Muslim imam.

“I think this is a crushing blow for free speech and freedom of the press. If you’re going to run these ads, be consistent,” Gellar said in an interview with Fox News.

Gellar is correct. The inconsistency is what's revealing. The bias is exposed.

On one hand, the Times champions free speech. On the other hand, it squelches free speech. The bias is glaring.

There's no problem running an ad from the Freedom From Religion Foundation, calling for members of the Catholic Church to quit.

The atheist group issued a news release to announce the ad.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation placed an open letter via a full-page ad in today’s New York Times (page 10, front section) urging liberal and nominal Roman Catholics to “quit” their church over its war against contraception.

Beginning “It’s your moment of truth,” the ad asks: “Do you choose women and their rights, or Bishops and their wrongs? You are an enabler. And it’s got to stop.”

“As a member of the ‘flock’ of an avowedly antidemocratic Old Boys Club, isn’t it time you vote with your feet? Please, exit en Mass,” requests the ad, signed by FFRF Co-Presidents Annie Laurie Gaylor and Dan Barker.

The ad features a cartoon by Steve Benson depicting an angry bishop, with a woman next to a birth control pill telling him: “All the outrage over something this small is a bit hard to swallow.”

The Times required FFRF to alter its punchy headline, ‘It’s Time to Quit the Catholic Church,’ to ‘It’s Time to Consider Quitting the Catholic Church.’ Barker called that decision “disappointing” and “a sign of the Catholic Church’s inordinate power to intimidate and muzzle criticism.”

The ad blasts the church’s “pernicious doctrine that birth control is a sin” and the “Respect for Rights of Conscience Act” introduced into Congress to impose church dogma on employees. FFRF warns the liberal Catholic that the church is “launching a ruthless political Inquisition in your name.”

“It’s a disgrace that U.S. health care reform is being held hostage to your church’s irrational opposition to medically prescribed contraception. No political candidate should have to genuflect before the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.”

Gaylor called “The war against contraception and reproductive liberty the state/church issue of our day.”

She called the ad a “ ‘telling truth to power’ moment,” adding that “The Roman Catholic hierarchy would wither away without the support, financial and otherwise, of its members. They must be accountable for what is being done in their name.”

The ad concludes by inviting nominal Catholics to “join those of us who put humanity above dogma.”

FFRF warmly thanks the outpouring of support by hundreds of FFRF members and others who helped FFRF raise $52,000 in just one weekend, making possible the stand-by ad.

Significant donors who contributed $1,000 or more included Dan Barker, Fairfid M. Caudle, Robert & Jo Chanaud, James G. Coors, Jeff & Jill Dean, Mr. & Mrs. Timothy Gallivan, Annie Laurie Gaylor, Lali Reddy, M.D., Nicholas Sargeantson, Jane & Stefan Shoup, Claudette St.Pierre, Fred Thorlin, R. Jeffrey Wenk and John Whiteside. Several major donors preferred to remain anonymous.

These haters contributed $52,000 to slam Catholics and encourage them to quit the Church, "exit en Mass."

Really disgusting.

The New York Times took it.

Supposedly, the Times refused to run Gellar's ad because doing so would put American troops in Afghanistan in danger.

Here's what the New York Times wrote to Gellar:

The fallout from running this ad now could put U.S. troops and/or civilians in the [Afghan] region in danger.

What hypocrites!

The Times doesn't care about the safety of American troops. If it did, why would the paper spill military secrets and plaster the front page with information that undermines operations?

Worried about the safety of U.S. troops?

Give me a break!

The New York Times displays no journalistic integrity.

Here's video.