Tuesday's White House Press Briefing picked up where Monday's left off.
Out of about 28 minutes, over half of the briefing was devoted to the Vice President's hunting accident.
Naturally, it was the first issue raised by the reporters. Right out of the chute, egomaniac David Gregory attacked and rehashed the same things that were addressed in Monday's briefing. Obviously, he was still riled up.
Gregory wasn't the only one to behave like a three-year-old in need of a nap.
Carl Cameron, Martha Raddatz, Victoria Jones, Ann Compton were also obsessed with the hunting accident. They were all drawn to it like moths to a bug zapper.
Transcript
David Gregory = Q
Q Scott, I just have two questions to follow up on the accidental shooting by the Vice President. Does the President think that the Vice President should address this publicly, personally, speak to the American people in any fashion to explain what happened and why it took so long to disclose it publicly?
MR. McCLELLAN: Well, I think what happened has been explained. The Vice President's Office has talked about it; I've talked about it. And I represent the President and speak for him. The Vice President's spokeswoman speaks for him, as well. So that information has been provided. We went through this pretty thoroughly yesterday.
Q So the President doesn't think that the Vice President should actually think about it himself, not through intermediaries?
MR. McCLELLAN: You talk to the Vice President on a fairly frequent basis in the past, and I'm sure you will in the future, as well.
Q But he shouldn't really have to address specifically, in your view --
MR. McCLELLAN: Well, he has, through his office.
Q Okay, let me ask you this -- is the President concerned that the Vice President made decisions about the public disclosure of this incident that are clearly at odds with how you and others advising the President disclose personal information about the President's activities?
MR. McCLELLAN: Let me just say this, since there's some follow-up questions that you all have. First of all, I think we went through this pretty thoroughly yesterday and I worked to answer the questions to the best of my ability and in a forthright manner, based on the facts that I knew. There were some very legitimate questions that were asked. As I indicated, I always believe that you can look back and work to do better. I indicated that yesterday. I think today what we're focusing our efforts is on what are the most pressing priorities before the American people. And that's where we're focusing. I understand you still have some --
Q That's fine, and that's appropriate.
MR. McCLELLAN: If you want to continue to spend time on that, that's fine. We're moving on to the priorities of the American people. That's where our focus is.
Q That's fair, and that's your prerogative, and I've got my job to do, which is, try to get you to answer that question. Does the President think it's appropriate for the Vice President to essentially make decisions at odds with the public disclosure process of this White House?
MR. McCLELLAN: Well, I think that I've expressed my views, and we went through this yesterday.
Q But that's a non-answer.
MR. McCLELLAN: Well, that's what I was trying to indicate to you --
Q Does the President have a view about how the Vice President has conducted himself?
MR. McCLELLAN: Again, that's what I -- I indicated to you yesterday what our views were.
Q No, I don't recall you sharing the President's view.
MR. McCLELLAN: Yes, but can I finish responding? I'm glad to answer your questions.
Q You didn't answer that question. It was very respectful --
MR. McCLELLAN: I was very respectful and responsive to you all --
Q The Vice President basically decided on his own to not disclose this, which is at odds with how you do business and how the President does business, right?
MR. McCLELLAN: I don't want to make this about anything other than what it is. It is what it is, David. I was very respectful and responsive to your questions yesterday. I provided you the information I knew based on the facts that were available, and we've been through this pretty thoroughly.
Q You don't have an answer to this question. All right, one final question.
MR. McCLELLAN: Wait, wait, I'm just not going to go back through it again. I'd appreciate it if you'd let me respond fully before you jump in.
Q All right, but -- well, hold on one second. I've got one final question.
MR. McCLELLAN: Other people in this room have questions, and we've got an event coming up.
Q I understand that, but I'm not getting answers here, Scott, and I'm trying to be forthright with you, but don't tell me that you're giving us complete answers when you're not actually answering the question, because everybody knows what is an answer and what is not an answer.
MR. McCLELLAN: David, now you want to make this about you, and it's not about you, it's about what happened. And that's what I'm trying to --
Q I'm sorry that you feel that way, but that's not what I'm trying to do.
MR. McCLELLAN: And I'm trying to provide answers to the questions.
Q I have one final question, since that one wasn't answered. Is it appropriate for the Vice President to have waited 14 hours after the incident before he spoke with local law enforcement officials? And do you think that an average citizen would have been accorded that same amount of time before having to answer questions about a shooting incident?
MR. McCLELLAN: That was what was arranged with the local law enforcement authorities. You ought to ask them that question.
How lame!
Gregory seemed to be trying to settle a personal spat with Scott McClellan rather than taking part in a press briefing.
It was very easy to imagine what it would be like to witness a marital spat in the Gregory household. Actually, that creeped me out.
I loved it when Scott McClellan said, "David, now you want to make this about you, and it's not about you, it's about what happened." That's exactly what Gregory was doing.
Without question, Gregory has shown a complete lack of professionalism on this hunting accident matter.
On Monday, I said that Gregory had morphed into the Dan Rather of this century. After his performance on Tuesday, I think it's more fitting to compare him to Helen Thomas. Very unsteady.
The White House Press Corps needs to get a grip.
While the accident is a legitimate story, it is by no means the most important story out there.
The lib media's desire to latch on to anything that they think will do personal damage to the President, the Vice President, or other members of the Administration reveals just how unfair and unbalanced they are in their reporting.
Ironically, the effect of their unabashed bias is not doing nearly as much damage to the Bush Administration as it is to their own credibility as journalists.
I don't want to see Wednesday's briefing, but I know I'll watch it. It's like train wreck. You can't turn away.
Wednesday, February 15, 2006
Round 2
Posted by Mary at 2/15/2006 01:39:00 AM
Labels: David Gregory, Helen Thomas, Media
SHARE:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I was gone for a week, so don't forget to come back to my blog when you have a chance
Will do.
Post a Comment