Katie Couric's first CBS Evening News broadcast started off normally enough.
I don't watch CBS so I can't say if the set was revamped much. It looked like a typical set. The desk was there. The background was standard stuff.
Same old, same old.
Couric was wearing a black dress with a short white jacket, buttoned. She looked tanned but not rested.
She didn't seem very relaxed. It's possible that she was nervous (Who wouldn't be?). It's also possible that she was trying to be the 21st Century's Uncle Walter. She may have been going for gravitas.
If that was the case, she didn't pull it off. Aunt Katie is no Uncle Walter.
The first story was a propaganda piece on how the Taliban has regained control in an area of Afghanistan that had been controlled by U.S. troops.
Was that really the lead story of the day?
The big breaking news?
The answer is NO.
A couple other brief stories followed, including Jim Axelrod from the White House lawn, introducing his coverage of President Bush and briefly bantering with Couric.
Next, Couric interviewed Thomas Friedman, New York Times columnist.
They talked about President Bush and the Dems. It was brief and completely pointless. I admit that I was distracted. Instead of being at the desk, Couric and Friedman were seated in chairs, Today show-style. I thought it looked strange. The Evening News is not the Today show.
There was some more run of the mill stuff, then before the next commercial break, Couric teased what was up next.
"Something new for the Evening News, besides me (Couric tilts head, smiles broadly). We call it 'Free Speech.'"
When she returned, Couric said, "We want to encourage more civil discourse."
Since when is it the duty of the Evening News to do that? I thought it was meant to give viewers the news of the day, not be a retreat.
Morgan Spurlock was given the premiere segment. He talked about the divisions in the country, Blue state/Red state. He spoke of "Smackdown hype" with shots of WWE Wrestling footage spliced in. His conclusion: Americans aren't nearly as divided they seem. Most of us are in the middle.
In other words, "Don't be turned off because Couric is a big time lib."
Then, Couric plugged Thursday's upcoming "Free Speech" segment with Rush Limbaugh. That was clearly a calculated move. She didn't mention tomorrow night's guest. Apparently, CBS is trying to draw people in with Limbaugh's star power and appear to be fair and balanced. Sorry, but ninety seconds of conservative opinion doesn't balance thirty minutes of lib slant.
I predict Thursday will deliver the best numbers she'll ever get.
Another new feature--
"Snapshots"
First, came a vintage photo of 19-week-old Prince Charles. (Yawn)
Then, the baby picture that the world has been anxiously waiting to see -- a photo of Suri Cruise, daughter of Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise. It was an Annie Leibovitz photo, part of an upcoming issue of Vanity Fair. (Yawn)
What silly fluff!
Quickly, the historic half-hour came to a close.
It was time for Couric to sign-off. She said that in the run up to her first broadcast as CBS anchor, she had been asked repeatedly about what her signature sign-off would be.
Couric said she hadn't come up with anything yet, and introduced a taped bit of past famous anchors signing off, including:
Edward R. Murrow
Chet Huntley and David Brinkley
Walter Cronkite
Dan Rather
Ted Baxter (Fictional)
Ron Burgundy (Fictional)
After the famous anchormen signed-off, she invited viewers to send in their suggestions for her trademark buh-bye. (Good grief, how odd!)
I suppose Couric's fans loved it.
She brought her first broadcast to an end with this:
"I'm Katie Couric. Thank you so much for watching, and I hope to see you tomorrow night."
The final shot was Couric half-sitting, half-leaning against the desk, flaunting the legs that are supposed to be so great. No photo-shop help on live TV.
Overall, the broadcast seemed very forced (the smiles, the leg shots, the segments). It had a frenetic feel to it.
It was a mixture of the serious and the downright dopey.
Tomorrow, Couric interviews President Bush. I can't imagine it being a very long segment. Maybe I'll tune in, and maybe I'll do the same on Thursday to see Limbaugh.
But after that, I'm signing off.
Tuesday, September 5, 2006
Couric in CBS' Center Ring
Posted by Mary at 9/05/2006 06:15:00 PM
Labels: Media
SHARE:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
What? No see-through desk for Queen Katie to show off her legs? Oh, no,..she won't last long there.
If Dan Rather could be the anchor for 24 years, I think she'll last. :)
I must admit, I watched her for the exact same amount of time I watched Rather for the previous decade.........NOT 1 STINKING SECOND!!
Not that ABC, NBC, CNN, MSNBC or even FOX get any of my time either......They all suck. FOX just sucks a little less.
Here's hoping she bombs, and CBS realizes they need to cancel the news and go to another reality/freak show.
I don't watch network news so I missed Katie.
Rush has taped a 90 second spot that will be aired Thursday on Katie news. Drudge Report
This is off topic.
I was going to blog it but I probably would have said things that wouldn't be PC.
I think this a job for Super Freedom Eden's blog.
Jane Fonda, Gloria Steinem and Rosie O'Donnell are backing a new left-wing radio network that plans to appeal to women listeners and counter the dominance of conservative talk radio and its "male point of view."
News Max
I am little curious what women they are appealing to.
A radio network run by a woman who aided and abetted the enemy - a liberal feminist and a lesbian.
Thanks for that tip, RJay.
I will write about it. :)
Post a Comment