Thursday, October 19, 2006

Al Gore's Legacy

I guess the Dems aren't really as confident as they make themselves out to be when it comes to a sweeping victory in November.

By highlighting the potential for election day chaos, the libs are setting the stage for legal challenges of the results.

From
The New York Times:


New electronic voting machines have arrived in Yolo County, Calif., but there is one hitch: the audio program for the visually impaired in some of them works only in Vietnamese.

“Talk about panic,” said Freddy Oakley, the county’s top election official. “I’ve got gray-haired ladies as poll workers standing around looking stunned.”

As dozens of states are enforcing new voter registration laws and switching to paperless electronic voting systems, officials across the country are bracing for an Election Day with long lines and heightened confusion, followed by an increase in the number of contested results.

In Maryland, Mississippi and Pennsylvania, a shortage of technicians has vendors for new machines soliciting applications for technical support workers on job Web sites like Monster.com. Ms. Oakley, who is also facing a shortage, raided the computer science department at the University of California, Davis, hiring 60 graduate students as troubleshooters.

Arizona, California, Georgia, Indiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio and Pennsylvania are among the states considered most likely to experience difficulties, according to voting experts who have been tracking the technology and other election changes.

“We’ve got new laws, new technology, heightened partisanship and a growing involvement of lawyers in the voting process,” said Tova Wang, who studies elections for the Century Foundation, a nonpartisan research group. “We also have the greatest potential for problems in more places next month than in any voting season before.”

Convenient, isn't it?

Election Day is less than three weeks away and we can already count on candidates and their supporters crying, "Foul."


Election officials in many of the states are struggling with delays in the delivery of machines before the election as old-fashioned lever and punch-card machines are phased out. A chronic shortage of poll workers, many of them retirees uncomfortable with new technology, has worsened matters.

Way to insult older Americans!

The suggestion is that they're incapable of learning to manage new technology.

It's not as if the retirees have anything to do with the programming of the paperless machines.

Touchscreen technology isn't that complicated.


Wendy S. Noren, the top election official for Boone County, Mo., which includes Columbia, said delays in the delivery of new machines had left her county several weeks behind schedule and with 600 poll workers yet to be trained. Ms. Noren said she also had not yet been provided with the software coding she needed to print the training manuals.

“I think we will make it,” she said, “but my staff is already at the point of passing out, and the sprint is just starting.”

New computerized registration rolls and litigation over new voter identification laws in states like Arizona, Georgia, Indiana and Missouri have left many poll workers and voters unclear about the rules, including whether they are in effect, as the courts have blocked many of the new laws.

“We’re expecting arguments at the polls in these states that will slow everything down and probably cause large numbers of legitimate voters to be turned away or to be forced to vote on provisional ballots,” said Barbara Burt, an elections reform director for Common Cause.

This is ridiculous.

There is no excuse for this unpreparedness.


Meanwhile, votes in about half of the 45 most competitive Congressional races, including contests in Florida, Georgia and Indiana, will be cast on electronic machines that provide no independent means of verification.

Question: Why would a voting machine be designed to provide no way to audit the results?
...Charles Stewart, head of the political science department at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, published a study this year indicating that from 2000 to 2004, new technology helped reduce the number of improperly marked ballots by about one million votes.

“If you think things are bad and worrisome now, they were much worse before 2000,” Mr. Stewart said, adding that breakdowns in the mechanics of voting are simply more highlighted, not more prevalent.

The headline for this NYT article is "New Laws and Machines May Spell Voting Woes."

Instead of screaming that the sky may fall, the headline should be, "New Machines Dramatically Improve Voting Process."

...Whether there are problems or not, post-election litigation is likely. A study released this year by the Washington and Lee Law Review found that the number of court cases challenging elections has risen in recent years. In 2004, the number was 361, up from 104 cases in 1998.

Gee, why do you think that would be?

It's Al Gore's legacy.

2 comments:

Susan Duclos said...

Good piece. I have linked to it with mine, and would love to trackback, but you don't offer that. Halo Scan has a decent program and easy to install if you decide to use trackbacks.

Mary said...

Thanks, Spree. I'll check your post.

I've read some things about Halo Scan and trackbacks and losing past comments when installing the program.

I'm surprised Blogger doesn't just offer it.