Thursday, November 16, 2006

Ethical Stem Cell Research Advances

Two stories exhibit the promise of stem cells in treating and curing disease.

1. Stem cells help dogs with dystrophy

NEW YORK -- In promising new research, stem cells worked remarkably well at easing symptoms of muscular dystrophy in dogs, an experiment that experts call a significant step toward treating people.

"It's a great breakthrough for all of us working on stem cells for muscular dystrophy," said researcher Johnny Huard of the University of Pittsburgh, who wasn't involved in the work.

Sharon Hesterlee, vice president of translational research at the Muscular Dystrophy Association, called the result one of the most exciting she's seen in her eight years with the organization. Her group helped pay for the work.

She stressed that it's not yet clear whether such a treatment would work in people, but said she had "cautious optimism" about it.

Two dogs that were severely disabled by the disease were able to walk faster and even jump after the treatments.

The study was published online Wednesday by the journal Nature. It used stem cells taken from the affected dogs or other dogs, rather than from embryos. For human use, the idea of using such "adult" stem cells from humans would avoid the controversial method of destroying human embryos to obtain stem cells.

2. Heart valves grown from womb fluid cells
CHICAGO -- Scientists for the first time have grown human heart valves using stem cells from the fluid that cushions babies in the womb — offering a revolutionary approach that may be used to repair defective hearts in the future.

The idea is to create these new valves in the lab while the pregnancy progresses and have them ready to implant in a baby with heart defects after it is born.

The Swiss experiment follows recent successes at growing bladders and blood vessels and suggests that people may one day be able to grow their own replacement heart parts — in some cases, even before they're even born.

It's one of several sci-fi tissue engineering advances that could lead to homegrown heart valves for infants and adults that are more durable and effective than artificial or cadaver valves.

"This may open a whole new therapy concept to the treatment of congenital heart defects," said Dr. Simon Hoerstrup, a University of Zurich scientist who led the work, which was presented Wednesday at an American Heart Association conference.

Also at the meeting, Japanese researchers said they had grown new heart valves in rabbits using cells from the animals' own tissue. It's the first time replacement heart valves have been created in this manner, said lead author Dr. Kyoko Hayashida.

"It's very promising," University of Chicago cardiologist Dr. Ziyad Hijazi said of the two studies. "I don't doubt" that it will be applied one day in humans, he said.

...Valves made from the patient's own cells are living tissue and might be able to grow with the patient, said Hayashida, a scientist at the National Cardiovascular Center Research Institute in Osaka.

The Swiss procedure has another advantage: using cells the fetus sheds in amniotic fluid avoids controversy because it doesn't involve destroying embryos to get stem cells.

"This is an ethical advantage," Hoerstrup said at the meeting.

Very promising advances indeed.

But wait a minute.

I thought that only EMBRYONIC stem cell research could yield the really big and best payoffs.

Michael J. Fox said so. Jim Doyle said so.

However, in both of these instances, the stem cells utilized in the procedures did not come from embryos.

Life was NOT destroyed to achieve the desired results.

Bottom line:


Medical breakthroughs do not have to come at the price of cheapening life.

Embryos, genetically complete human beings, do not have to be viewed as some expendable raw material.

The ethics of research methods do matter.

We should all be encouraged by the news of these advances and the hope that they bring.

Medical progress is not necessarily obstructed by rejecting the Culture of Death.




2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I really like your post but I have a few questions. I know there is a difference between embryonic stem cells and adult stem cells but I'm confused as to why. Is there a different chemical makeup and how do they go about extracting both of them? I do know that on the adult stem cells front, there was a recent discovery of cells within the human bone marrow that can be expanded for more than 80 population doublings. The cells can be made to differentiate, at the single cell level, into bone and cartilage cells, skeletal muscle cells, fat cells, bone marrow, and endothelial cells (internal linings) of the internal organs. Do think this could be done with embryonic stem cells as well, while of course taking into mind that they have a history of being unstable in long term cultures. I would also appreciate it if you could let me know other property differences you know of between ES and adult stem cells. I just feel like I don’t know enough about either of them to debate effectively and I would appreciate your help.

Thanks,

Mary said...

"adam,"

You don't need my help.

Do you see a turnip truck around here?