Saturday, December 1, 2007

James Buss

UPDATE: The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel screws up AGAIN.

This time, the "editing error" is noted. An "editing error" put words in the mouths of the police -- right.

Correction: Because of an editing error, an article Saturday on a teacher's arrest in connection with a blog item that praised the Columbine High School killers incorrectly stated that police said he was “apparently posing as a teacher-hater.” That statement was not made by police.
_____________

When will people learn that posting anonymously on the Internet is not the same as being anonymous?

Cudahy man and Oak Creek High School teacher James Buss learned that the hard way.


West Bend -- As readers of a conservative blog debated the subject of teacher salaries, a writer using the pseudonym "Observer" weighed in.

The West Bend teachers' salaries made him sick, the person wrote, adding that the 1999 Columbine High School killers had the right idea.

"They knew how to deal with the overpaid teacher union thugs. One shot at a time! Too bad the liberls (sic) rip them; they were heros (sic) and should be remembered that way," the writer said.

But police say the writer was a teacher himself - and the past president of a teachers union - apparently posing as a teacher-hater.

James Buss was arrested Thursday by West Bend police, and the 46-year-old Cudahy man could face criminal charges. He has been suspended from his job as a teacher at Oak Creek High School.

Buss, a former president of the Oak Creek School District's teachers union, is on an indefinite leave of absence from the school pending further investigation, district Superintendent Sara Larsen said. He teaches chemistry and has been employed at the school since 1994.

...[Owen Robinson, a West Bend resident and administrator of bootsandsabers.com] criticized Buss' arrest as an overreaction.

"The comments were not a direct threat to teachers," he said. "This is free speech."

...One message Buss is accused of posting praises Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold. They were the high school seniors who killed 12 students and one teacher at Columbine High School in Colorado in April 1999 before taking their lives.

"We've got to get in back of the kids who have had enough of lazy, no good teachers and are fighting back. Kids like Eric Harris and Dylen Klebold," wrote the "Observer," whose message contained several misspelled words, including Klebold's first name.

A teacher employed by the West Bend School District read the message later that evening and immediately contacted School District administrators, West Bend police Capt. Toby Netko said.

Netko said Buss posted the message from his home computer. Netko released the text Friday.

Buss was arrested Thursday and released from the Washington County Jail after posting $300 bail.

"The teacher and district officials considered it a threat," Netko said, referring to the statement "One shot at a time" in the message.

"If you're a teacher, you would take this seriously," he said.

Maryjane Burdge, West Bend's assistant superintendent of curriculum and instruction, agreed that she and other officials did interpret the statement as a threat. For that reason, they notified police the same day of the posting.

Owen discusses the matter here and here and here.

I agree with his assessment of the situation, that it was a "gross overreaction for a comment left on a blog."

I also agree with Owen that Buss' arrest was unwarranted.

If every individual who left similar comments on blogs ended up under arrest, the jails would be bursting at the seams.

Yes, things changed after Columbine. The Virginia Tech shootings made officials even more jittery. Finnish teen Pekka Eric Auvinen posted his violent intentions on YouTube and carried them out, killing seven students, the principal, and himself.

Threats have to be taken seriously.

But-- Sound judgment needs to be applied to determine what constitutes a serious threat. Granted, that's easier said than done. A misjudgment can be deadly.

Buss is certainly paying the price for posting irresponsibly.

It appears that he may have posted while drunk or otherwise impaired. More likely, I think he utilized the technique of attempting to disguise himself with multiple misspellings and poor punctuation. (I'm assuming that Buss, the teacher, is more proficient at writing than his posts reveal.)

As Owen notes, the Internet provides a false sense of anonymity.

While blogs can provide forums for lively discussion, posters need to understand that they can be traced. They aren't free to say anything without being held accountable. They need to understand that they don't check their personal responsibility at the Internet's door.

The Internet is not a responsibility-free zone.

It's a creepy phenomenon. An otherwise responsible person will morph, jumping at the chance to let loose an alter ego when online. It can be remarkably reckless, as well as remarkably naive.

Will the real James Buss please stand up?

14 comments:

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Mary said...

OK, "fon."

Enough of the spam.

Do NOT go to "College online for good ideas."

Display Name said...

It only goes to show you - on many conservative blogs, you'll have a hard time telling the difference between the real posts and the fake ones. This idiot teacher was merely trying to blend in by imitating the spelling, typing and logic skills of many other B&S commenters. Read a few comments to find other examples. I can't wait for other bloggers to find more examples of vaguely threatening or misanthropic rants on other Wisconsin politics blogs. I'd start at Texas Hold 'Em.

The deeper and far funnier story, in a karmic or ironic sort of way, is that Owen had led an AFP-sponsored robo-calling effort against West Bend's school referendum a month or so ago. School officials might've been eager to pin a threat on a B&S commenter. Who knew it would turn out to be a teacher from a different school district?

Sure, you don't have an expectation of deep privacy, but they've also abused this power for fun and profit. I've seen them "out" someone when they didn't like what they were saying. For example, B&S's Owen revealed that someone was posting from a governmental IP address in order to discredit the person's opinion. Nice, huh?

Yet in another case , they don't reveal their IP evidence when it would clearly prove or disprove their slurs against a commenter - me. I comment on B&S's comments on my blog.

Anonymous said...

It wasn't specific enough to be construed as a direct threat against anyone.

If this is considered valid, what about all the lawyer jokes that suggest that the death of a few lawyers is "a good start"?

How about the famous quote: "..First thing we do is kill all the lawyers.."

etc, etc.. a "veiled threat" is not illegal.

If someone threatens you directly, or in a direct fashion such as to point a gun at you, or suggest that they will/WOULD shoot you, that's when it crosses the line.

This is absolutely preposterous. Granted, I don't like his content, nor agree with his view, but that doesn't mean he should be strung up for it.

Unless of course the desire IS to get folks to start up a militia and take a stand against the government through our constitutional rights?

I can't imagine no one would realize the level of controversy this kind of thing can create. For many folks this could be a "last straw" in terms of losing our rights and liberties.

I hope someone wakes up and backs off, this could REALLY get ugly.

And just to ensure that noone thinks I'm making some kind of violent threat here, I'm not. I just hope folks understand that there are those that feel very strongly about this kinda thing, and could, given the wrong circumstances, make this a very ugly event.

Mary said...

John, I don't appreciate your not too subtle shot at the "spelling, typing and logic skills" of Boots and Sabers commenters (AKA conservatives).

Conservatives can spell, type, and think logically.

You obviously have an ax to grind with Boots and Sabers.

As far as B&S "outing" posters on some occasions and not clarifying matters on other occasions, I'm not in a position to comment. I'm not familiar with the details of the situations.

In any event, that has nothing to do with James Buss. You have a beef with a West Bend teacher and the West Bend police department, not B&S.

The teacher deemed the post to be threatening and the police apparently agreed.

To "anonymous, 9:10 PM, December 01, 2007"--

I trust our legal system will sort out Buss' case.

While his arrest seems a bit extreme to me, I certainly don't think it's the "last straw" in terms of losing our liberties. Buss' arrest isn't the first shot in a revolution, a shot heard 'round the Web.

I don't think this is going to get REALLY ugly, as you put it.

The fact is Buss used extremely poor judgment. He was playing with fire and got burned. He's old enough to know better.

If public school teachers are behaving this way, it shouldn't come as a shock when students do.

Display Name said...

No, really, go to B&S and examine some of the posts. Sure, some are free of spelling errors, but this idiot teacher was correctly imitating the poor spelling and typos and shallow logic of many other visitors. That's why he did it.

Mary said...

You keep calling Buss an "idiot teacher." Why?

In your view, is he an idiot for making the threatening posts, or for posing as what the JS initially and inaccurately claimed the police called a "teacher-hater"?

Another question: How do you know WHY Buss did what he did?

Have you discussed this matter with "idiot teacher" Buss? Are you close to Buss?

I also wonder why you are so bent on discrediting the commenters at Boots and Sabers for their spelling and typing skills.

Why must you be so condescending? It's certainly not very compassionate.

It seems rather petty to me.

Display Name said...

Even B&S says that the comment in question was apparently trying to imitate a "right wing whack job." I'm saying I agree, there are people on B&S who write like that. Is it everyone there? Of course not.

I don't know Buss. Neither does B&S, yet they were first to jump on the bandwagon of branding him a liberal and tarring him with whatever that brush entails. They're just assuming things, too.

I meant "idiot" in the sense that this teacher made some very poor judgments about how to present his argument. Was he imitating the less-than-sharp crayons? Perhaps. I think parody is far more useful when it's pointed and actually funny. Is he actually a right-wing whack job who believes exactly what he typed? Probably not.

Mary said...

Your past comments state that you know with certitude that Buss was imitating the "less-than-sharp crayons" at B&S.

You don't know that. You're speculating. There's nothing wrong with that, but it's misleading when you frame your speculation as fact.

We do know that Buss used extraordinarily poor judgment, in addition to poor spelling, when he posted at B&S.

You must admit that misspellings and bad grammar are not exclusive to B&S. They're found on both conservative and liberal sites.

Display Name said...

It's fine to question assumptions, Mary. I'm assuming that an AP chemistry teacher has better spelling and logic skills than those shown in his posted comment. The blog owner, as I pointed out, reached the same conclusion. Would you agree?

Mary said...

As I said, there's nothing wrong with making assumptions. The problem that I have is the certitude with which you state your assumptions.

When you said, "That's why he did it," I didn't get the impression that you were making an assumption about Buss' behavior.

Anonymous said...

Buss is supported by people who argue for his free-speech rights while being ignorant of the original context and times in which that amendment was adopted.

At the time the free-speech amendment was adopted into the Constitution, it was widely and commonly understood that teachers were held to a higher standard than the rest of the populace. This world view was assumed by the 98% Christian culture that constituted America at that time. This is because this is a Biblical teaching, and no one at the time ever intimated that a teacher could say just anything and be protected by free-speech rights. In my opinion, those who support Buss are simply wrong.

What Buss did would not have been considered by the founders to be protected speech, given he is a teacher of high school students and in a position to influence their attitudes and opinions. This is not a true free-speech issue. And, even if it were, no one--teacher or not--has the right to yell "fire" in a crowded theater if there is no fire. The point is that there are consequences to what we say, whether we have the right to say it or not. The Columbine experience and the subsequent copy-cat acts that have followed have created too grave an issue of safety and security for all people in educational institutions.

Buss should lose his right and privilege to teach, in my opinion.

Anonymous said...

SpeakSense
comedy and common sense commentary
http://speaksense.blogspot.com/

Anonymous said...

No Charges Over Online Columbine Comment

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gBgSjgAp90YSBebVLOdVp3xEAYPwD8TBPQDO0

(from an AP article by RYAN J. FOLEY"

"Washington County District Attorney Todd Martens said the comment left by James Buss was offensive and disgusting, but was protected speech under the state and U.S. constitutions."

DING, DING, DING! We have a winner. Looks like this dufus, Martens, actually made it through Constitutional Law 101.

Wonder if that means he can find his ass with both hands and a flashlight. Nahhh.