Friday, April 18, 2008

Shvarts' Performance Art

UPDATE, April 22, 2008: Yale Pulls Student's 'Abortion Art' Project From Exhibit Opening

Senior Aliza Shvarts' controversial piece still could be included in the student show, which runs through May 1, Yale officials indicated.

"Her exhibit is not on display, but it's unresolved as to whether it will be," said Yale spokesman Tom Conroy, suggesting discussions were in progress between the university and Shvarts.

Discussions?

This is ridiculous. Maybe Jimmy Carter can help resolve the matter.
Shvarts kept mum through the weekend and early this week despite the school's calls for her to confess that she lied in describing how she constructed the project. She didn't respond to repeated calls or e-mails requesting comment.

Yale officials warned that unless the art major agreed to say in writing that she hadn't told the truth about artificially inseminating herself and then taking herbal drugs to try to induce miscarriages, they'd yank her piece from the student exhibit, which opened Tuesday morning and closes May 1.

Does this mean she gets an A on her project?
___________________

UPDATE, April 21, 2008: Yale to Cancel Controversial 'Abortion Art' Exhibit Unless Student Admits It's Fiction
_________________

UPDATE: Shvarts maintains her facade.

Blah, blah, blah.

Pull the curtain on this one. The performance is over.

My review: Despicable. GAME OVER, SHVARTS.


_________________

Let me get this straight...

Aliza Shvarts' senior art project was "performance art." She didn't actually do what the Yale Daily News reported that she did. Apparently, she duped the newspaper and many people across the country, outraged over what she professed to have done.

Don't accuse Shvarts of lying. It was art.

Here's how Shvarts' project was described in the student newspaper on Thursday:

Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself "as often as possible" while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.

...The "fabricators," or donors, of the sperm were not paid for their services, but Shvarts required them to periodically take tests for sexually transmitted diseases. She said she was not concerned about any medical effects the forced miscarriages may have had on her body. The abortifacient drugs she took were legal and herbal, she said, and she did not feel the need to consult a doctor about her repeated miscarriages.

Shvarts declined to specify the number of sperm donors she used, as well as the number of times she inseminated herself.

...The display of Schvarts' project will feature a large cube suspended from the ceiling of a room in the gallery of Green Hall. Schvarts will wrap hundreds of feet of plastic sheeting around this cube; lined between layers of the sheeting will be the blood from Schvarts' self-induced miscarriages mixed with Vaseline in order to prevent the blood from drying and to extend the blood throughout the plastic sheeting.

Schvarts will then project recorded videos onto the four sides of the cube. These videos, captured on a VHS camcorder, will show her experiencing miscarriages in her bathrooom tub, she said. Similar videos will be projected onto the walls of the room.

School of Art lecturer Pia Lindman, Schvarts' senior-project advisor, could not be reached for comment Wednesday night.

Both pro-life and pro-abortion proponents reacted with horror.

Late on Thursday, Helaine S. Klasky, Yale University spokesperson, finally issued a statement about Shvarts' project:
New Haven, Conn. — April 17, 2008

Ms. Shvarts is engaged in performance art. Her art project includes visual representations, a press release and other narrative materials. She stated to three senior Yale University officials today, including two deans, that she did not impregnate herself and that she did not induce any miscarriages. The entire project is an art piece, a creative fiction designed to draw attention to the ambiguity surrounding form and function of a woman’s body.

She is an artist and has the right to express herself through performance art.

Had these acts been real, they would have violated basic ethical standards and raised serious mental and physical health concerns.

Yale supports Shvarts.

Why am I not surprised?

Shvarts' senior-project advisor is Pia Lindman.

Who is Pia Lindman?

Read her résumé.

Here's her profile, lecturer at M.I.T. (2004-2005):
Born in Espoo, Finland, Pia Lindman received her MFA from the Academy of Fine Arts in Finland, and then as a Fulbright scholar received a Master of Science in Visual Studies from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Massachusetts. She now lives and works in New York City.

Lindman takes the site-specific art tradition as a point of departure. Her work evolves around the themes of social context and space, as well as the performative aspect of making and experiencing art. By engineered social contexts like the Hybrid Sauna at M.I.T. in 1999 and Public Sauna at P.S.1 in 2000, Lindman aims to provoke members of the audience to perform and experience a particular social practice, forcing a re-evaluation of notions of corporeality and public sphere. Lindman’s approach to drawing is informed by the tradition of performance art. After videotaping herself re-enacting gestures of mourning captured in photographs in the New York Times, she traced these gestures from video stills with pencil. By exhibiting both the tracings and the enactments, she tries to illuminate some of the relationships between a photograph, its mediation, and the idea of original content, in this instance human emotional reaction to terrorism.

Lindman has mounted solo exhibitions and screenings at “the lab”, N.Y.C., Galleri Leena Kuumola in Helsinki Finland; the Institut Finlandais in Paris, France; Artist-in-Akiya in Tokyo, Japan; Kluuvi Gallery in Helsinki, Finland; and Galleri FABRIKEN in Gothenburg, Sweden. She has been included in group exhibitions and screenings in New York such as: “Premieres” at the Museum of Modern Art in N.Y.C., “BLIND DATES” at Sculpture Center L.I.C., "The Suburban Backyard" at Socrates Sculpture Park L.I.C., "Lobby Projections" at Museum of Modern Art in Queens; "New Views, World Financial Center", with Lower Manhattan Cultural Council and the World Financial Center Arts & Events; and "Greater New York" at P.S.1 Contemporary Art Center, L.I.C. Her video series Thisplace is in the MoMA collections. She has shown internationally in galleries and art institutions such as: Kunsthalle Exnergasse in Vienna, Austria, Millais Gallery at the Southampton Institute, U.K., San Francisco Arts Commission Gallery, SF, FIAC with Luxe Gallery, Paris, France, Kunstbunker in Nuremburg, Germany, Helsinki Museum of Contemporary Art, Finland, and Beaconsfield in London, UK. She has lectured widely, among other at Yale University School of Art and Architecture, New Haven, New York University School of Visual Art, Institut Française d’Architecture in Paris, France, and the Rhode Island School of Design. She has received numerous awards, including those from AVEK (The Promotion Centre for Audiovisual Culture in Finland, FRAME (Finnish Fund for Art Exchange), the Council for the Arts at MIT. Lindman’s work has been reviewed in many periodicals and journals including: Times Higher Educational Supplement, PRINT Magazine, Rethinking Marxism, Artforum.com, Brooklyn Rail, Art Press, The New York Times, The Village Voice, ARTnews, Technikart, Thresholds, Time Out New York, and Time Out London.

I suppose Yale didn't want to diss the distinguished Lindman by reprimanding her for overseeing Shvarts' disgusting "art."

From the Associated Press:

Cullen MacBeth, the student newspaper's managing editor, declined to comment Thursday.

Shvarts could not be reached for comment. Her telephone number was disconnected and she did not respond to e-mails or a knock on the door at the address listed for her in the campus directory in New Haven.

Why no comments?

I would think that the newspaper's managing editor would have a lot to say about being exploited by Shvarts.

And Shvarts-- she wanted to spark discussion, yet she's not talking.

Groups both for and against abortion rights expressed outrage over the affair.

Ted Miller, a spokesman for NARAL Pro-Choice America, called the concept offensive and "not a constructive addition to the debate over reproductive rights."

Peter Wolfgang, executive director of the Family Institute of Connecticut, an anti-abortion group, said his anger was not mitigated by the fact that Shvarts was never pregnant.

"I'm astounded by this woman's callousness," he said. "There are thousands of women in this country who are dealing with the pain of having had an abortion, with the trauma of having suffered a miscarriage. For her to make light of that for her own purposes is just beyond words."

I, too, find Shvarts' callousness astounding. As her advisor, I don't think Lindman should have signed off on such a cruel hoax.

Yale's Klasky says that Shvarts "is an artist and has the right to express herself through performance art."

True. Shvarts has the right to do unconscionable things and call it art.

I have the right to express myself.

Shvarts' project wasn't art. It was an exercise in heartlessness and soullessness, an assault on an audience without their permission. She's not a performance artist. She's a liar.

2 comments:

Pierre Menard said...

I graduated from the Yale undergrad art program last year. I used "creative fictions" (lies) in my presentation at the same seminar in which Aliza presented hers. Another student in my class used a similar conceit, which is an interesting trend in contemporary art. I will argue that the reason Shvart's performance is unconscionable is not because of dishonesty, but because of its cruelty and lack of humanity. It treats sensitive subjects and primal human emotion with the same care and consideration as paint on canvas. The two are not equivalent, no matter how interesting an essay one imagines Baudrillard writing about the possibility. Good art is moral, bad art is evil, and boring art is neither.

Mary said...

Without question, "creative fictions" have their place in art.

I don't consider all such techniques to be lies by any means.

Deceptions can be enlightening.

In my opinion, Shvarts' deception was terribly cruel. She victimized her audience. That's different than fooling people, an important moral distinction.