We keep hearing about Sonia Sotomayor's upbringing, that compelling story.
When Obama introduced her on Tuesday, he said, "Born in the South Bronx, she was raised in a housing project."
I guess that depends on what the meaning of "raised" is.
Obama misled Americans about Sotomayor in that he gave an incomplete picture of her life.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- There are two sides to Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor: a Latina from a blue-collar family and a wealthy member of America's power elite.
The White House portrays Sotomayor as a living image of the American dream, though its telling of the rags-to-riches story emphasizes the rags, a more politically appealing narrative, and plays down the riches.
...In speeches, Sotomayor has harkened back to her and her brother's beginnings in a poor Bronx neighborhood, roots that President Barack Obama highlighted in introducing her this week.
...Yet Sotomayor did not live her entire childhood in a housing project in the South Bronx—she spent most of her teenage years in a middle-class neighborhood, attending private school and winning scholarships to Princeton and then Yale.
And Sotomayor's life and lifestyle after law school largely resemble the background of many lawyers who rise to powerful positions in Washington.
She climbed her way up through New York's Democratic power structure boosted by its ultimate brokers over those years—Gov. Mario Cuomo, Mayor Ed Koch, Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan and District Attorney Robert Morgenthau. That's the access of a partner in a corporate law firm, not a kid from the South Bronx.
She now earns more than $200,000 a year and owns a condominium in Greenwich Village, a neighborhood of million-dollar-plus homes. Her brother, Dr. Juan Sotomayor, is a physician in North Syracuse, N.Y., whose practice doesn't accept Medicaid or Medicare—programs for the poor and elderly—according to its Web site.
Sotomayor said, "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life."
As it turns out, most of Sotomayor's experiences mirror those of rich, powerful, white males.
She has spent the majority of her life as a wealthy member of America's power elite.
Her physician brother, Dr. Juan Sotomayor, doesn't accept Medicare or Medicaid, government programs to provide health care to the elderly and the poor. Why would he reject those people? Why would he not treat them?
Obama described Sonia Sotomayor, "And even as she has accomplished so much in her life, she has never forgotten where she began, never lost touch with the community that supported her."
She may not have completely lost touch with the community that supported her, but she certainly doesn't live there anymore. She's lost touch at least a little bit.
I think it's a mistake for the White House and the Obama mouthpieces in the lib media to only emphasize the rags of her rags-to-riches story. It's dishonest.
5 comments:
Ya mean liberals are lying to get into positions of power?
If they told the truth nobody would want anything to do with them?
Thanks to all of the useful idiots that got us into this mess, and we haven't seen anything yet. Anything.
This is too surreal. You describe a rags-to-riches story and then complain that it's been sold as such. She lived in the projects when she was a kid, right? My sister and I have this argument about what qualifies as "raised." We moved out of one town when I was 14 and she was 18. She says we were both raised in that town. I say I get to claim both that town and the one I went to high school in. It certainly isn't at all dishonest for me to claim the town where I spent my childhood. But somehow, it's dishonest for the administration to mention Sotomayor's childhood in the projects?
And of course she's a member of an elite now. One does not get nominated to the Supreme Court if one has not achieved an elite status.
I'm sure you are in a much better position to decide whether she has in fact lost touch with her beginnings than you are.
Good grief, you will just find any little thing, no matter how ridiculous, to criticize. Find something of some real substance, already. How about reading some of her actual decisions if you really want to judge whether she's a good pick for the high court? Oh, no, it's just easier to parrot the ridiculous rightwing meme for the day.
"Oh, no, it's just easier to parrot the ridiculous rightwing meme for the day."
That's amusing. Thanks for making me laugh!
I wonder if SHARON THEIMER, AP WRITER, is pleased with your analysis.
Theimer came up with this "ridiculous rightwing meme for the day."
Notice you didn't address my actual comment, which was that this is a ridiculous spin to take. It's not the least bit dishonest for anyone to describe this woman as a rags to riches story. You're pretty good at mockingly rejecting any criticism of your posts, but you can't actually defend the substance.
Just because it was written by an AP writer, doesn't mean it can't become the latest silly thing the rightwing latches onto.
I'm not sure your excerpts from the aritcle fairly convey the tone and point of the piece. Yes, you quoted it accurately, but you left a lot out. But I also don't think you're interested in fairly conveying anything in regards to Sotomayor.
What I notice is that you're deflecting from the reality that Sotomayor is a member of the power elite and has been for most of her life.
I didn't say it was dishonest to mention Sotomayor's childhood, the rags. I do think it's dishonest of the White House to downplay the riches. It's just more of the politics of personality.
Look, you can pick at my post and latch on to silly arguments.
Knock yourself out.
That won't change the reality of Sotomayor's life.
I don't think there's anything wrong with sharing the rich experiences of wealthy, powerful, white males. I don't fault her for that at all.
By the way, I really object to being called a parrot. That ticks me off. It's not what I do.
I search news sites and offer MY opinions. I'm not taking cues from anyone.
Post a Comment