No end-of-life measures in the Senate health care reform bill?
That would be a painful concession for Senate Democrats.
Byron York, The Washington Examiner, writes:
Iowa Republican Sen. Charles Grassley, who is working with Finance Committee chairman Sen. Max Baucus on a health care compromise, has just issued a statement saying that concerns about end-of-life issues in the House health care bill are entirely legitimate. In addition, Grassley says the Finance Committee has "dropped end-of-life provisions from consideration entirely" because of those fears and also because of concerns that they could be "implemented incorrectly."
That's sort of slap in the face to Obama, who's been running around saying that no one will "pull the plug on Grandma," and any suggestion otherwise is an ugly rumor.
Here's Grassley's statement:
The bill passed by the House committees is so poorly cobbled together that it will have all kinds of unintended consequences, including making taxpayers fund health care subsidies for illegal immigrants. On the end-of-life issue, there’s a big difference between a simple educational campaign, as some advocates want, and the way the House committee-passed bill pays physicians to advise patients about end of life care and rates physician quality of care based on the creation of and adherence to orders for end-of-life care, while at the same time creating a government-run program that is likely to lead to the rationing of care for everyone. On the Finance Committee, we are working very hard to avoid unintended consequences by methodically working through the complexities of all of these issues and policy options. That methodical approach continues. We dropped end-of-life provisions from consideration entirely because of the way they could be misinterpreted and implemented incorrectly. Maybe others can defend a bill like the Pelosi bill that leaves major issues open to interpretation, but I can’t.
This comes from a U.S. senator, not a "fishy" e-mail circulating.
I wonder if any of Obama's army of supporters have sent Grassley's statement to flag@whitehouse.gov.
3 comments:
Palin was right, again. She usually is right, which is what scares the hell out the left, and the blueblood Republicans.
The Left loves to play with language.
What Palin called "death panels," Obama called "expert health panels."
Obama's choice of words doesn't change the reality.
Even the Dems aren't that clueless that they would actually use the term "death panel" in the bill.
If it looks like a death panel and acts like a death panel, it's a death panel.
A little honesty would be good from you Mary...... What Palin was claiming (falsely) was that there would be " death panels" that would make end of life decisions for you.
What this bill is proposing is that people should be encouraged to make decisions about their end of life care and put it in writing and that doctors must then adhere to these requests made by the patient.
Big huge difference Mary.
At best, Palin is a joke.
Post a Comment