Friday, August 28, 2009

ObamaCare and IRS Tax Data

Since Obama and the Democrats took over the federal government, their displays of arrogance have been stunning.

Their power has gone to their heads. They're attempting to grab more and more, weakening the people in the process.

What makes them think Americans will be passive and accept all this proposed government intrusion into our lives?

What makes them think we'll agree to give up our privacy?

From CBS News:

One of the problems with any proposed law that's over 1,000 pages long and constantly changing is that much deviltry can lie in the details. Take the Democrats' proposal to rewrite health care policy, better known as H.R. 3200 or by opponents as "Obamacare."

Section 431(a) of the bill says that the IRS must divulge taxpayer identity information, including the filing status, the modified adjusted gross income, the number of dependents, and "other information as is prescribed by" regulation. That information will be provided to the new Health Choices Commissioner and state health programs and used to determine who qualifies for "affordability credits."

Section 245(b)(2)(A) says the IRS must divulge tax return details -- there's no specified limit on what's available or unavailable -- to the Health Choices Commissioner. The purpose, again, is to verify "affordability credits."

Section 1801(a) says that the Social Security Administration can obtain tax return data on anyone who may be eligible for a "low-income prescription drug subsidy" but has not applied for it.

Over at the Institute for Policy Innovation (a free-market think tank and presumably no fan of Obamacare), Tom Giovanetti argues that: "How many thousands of federal employees will have access to your records? The privacy of your health records will be only as good as the most nosy, most dishonest and most malcontented federal employee.... So say good-bye to privacy from the federal government. It was fun while it lasted for 233 years."

...A better candidate for a future privacy crisis is the so-called stimulus bill enacted with limited debate early this year. It mandated the "utilization of an electronic health record for each person in the United States by 2014," but included only limited privacy protections.

It's true that if the legislative branch chooses to create "affordability credits," it probably makes sense to ensure they're not abused. The goal of curbing fraud runs up against the goal of preserving individual privacy.

If we're going to have such significant additional government intrusion into our health care system, we will have to draw the privacy line somewhere.

There is no fear mongering here, just facts.

Is Obama going to deny this attack on privacy?

Is he going to lie and say the health care bill doesn't permit the government to access individuals' IRS data?

Since this article was written, CBS has posted this update:

Marc Rotenberg of the Electronic Privacy Information Center says in e-mail: "We would oppose section 431(a) of the bill because it violates the intent of the Privacy Act which generally requires agencies to obtain information directly from individuals and not from other agencies." EPIC still hasn't updated their Web site to reflect this sentiment, but it's good to know that other folks have concerns too.

Obama and the Democrats are truly out of control.

And to think they were hoping to get this mess masquerading as health care reform (aka health insurance reform) passed before the recess!

These privacy issues should concern every American.

They should give even the most lefty Lefty pause.

2 comments:

Sherman Broder said...

An even scarier thought: Imagine what was in the unread, trillion-dollar bills that DID pass before the recess.

ZZMike said...

"What makes them think Americans will be passive and accept all this proposed government intrusion into our lives?"

They're counting on the fact - the fact - that a lot of people have no idea what's going on. We've asked a few people at random - in stores, mostly - what they think of the healthcare bill.

They have no idea.

Another response is, "I don't get involved in politics".

Are there really enough of us to turn the tide?