Obama's rhetoric is meaningless. He's weak. He's an ineffective leader. He is the 21st century's Jimmy Carter.
Supposedly, Obama is outraged about WikiLeaks and the spilling of U.S. State's Secrets. Robert Gibbs used milder terms, describing Obama as "not pleased."
Is Obama outraged or "not pleased" by the New York Times and other outlets publishing the documents?
These are the same news organizations that refused to publish cartoons of Mohammed.
What's Obama going to do about this egregious breach in security?
Nothing, but insist that he's angry or at least kind of ticked off?
That's not enough.
The buck stops with Obama. Since he's not going to resign because he has shown himself to be incapable of safeguarding our national security, he must take some significant action within his administration.
Hillary Clinton, U.S Secretary of State, head of the U.S Department of State, should be fired.
This happened on Hillary's watch. She has to go. She has to be held accountable.
It's not enough to simply pin responsibility on Bradley Manning, WikiLeaker.
And to the Leftists--
You went ballistic over the Valerie Plame idiocy.
You wanted heads to roll.
What's your response to this massive breach in the nation's security?
Here's a good idea to distract from Obama's screw-up: Focus on Obama's announcement of a federal pay freeze.
Anything to deflect from Obama's incompetence.
Hypocrites.
Julian Assange is to Obama as Ayatollah Khomeini is to Jimmy Carter.
Obama is impotent. He's held hostage by Assange. He's just as impotent as Carter was.
Obama must be a one-term president.
_______________
WikiLeaks Fallout: Should Hillary Clinton Resign?
Monday, November 29, 2010
WikiLeaks: Fire Hillary Clinton
Posted by Mary at 11/29/2010 05:00:00 PM
Labels: Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Jimmy Carter, Julian Assange, Leftists, Media, Obama Administration, Valerie Plame, WikiLeaks
SHARE:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
When it comes to breaking laws there is no comparison between the Obama administration and the previous Bush-Cheney gang. You say to the leftists "You went ballistic over the Valerie Plame idiocy" - as well the entire country should have. The administration committed the inexcusable act of outing one of their own agents and then proceeded to cover up, and Libby was left holding the bag. Where was your outrage when eleven officials were convicted of crimes during the 8-year Bush presidency? (Need facts? The list is posted at my website). You may disagree a lot with President Obama but it's far too early to begin the 2012 campaign. How about if we get some problems fixed first? (Jobs, economy, deficit, DADT, debt ceiling, immigration reform, ending wars, etc.) The Republicans are have been so focused on doing whatever it takes to make Obama look bad, hopefully the citizens of this great country will tire of their politics.
Obama cares about Obama. All of this means nothing to him. He has big plans and this is just noise.
Hillary and company have it wrong. The person who leaked the information, and the people who allowed the information to be leaked in the Department of Homeland Security, are eligible for prosecution. Media outlets who take the information and disseminate it are immune under US law.
Now, obviously, they are trying to change the law.
This is very ominous indeed. Wikileaks is providing a valuable service to the world. Governments always preach transparency but always hate when it actually comes to fruition.
Harvey, Harvey, Harvey: "hatred and paranoia"? Play nice, now.
Post a Comment