The residents of Milwaukee owe Governor Scott Walker and Republican legislators thanks for passing the budget bill.
That's right. The sky didn't fall as the Democrats and Leftists and union hacks predicted. They were wrong.
Milwaukee's state senator, Chris Larson, must be dining on crow tonight.
From the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:
Despite early criticism from city officials, new figures show Milwaukee will gain more than it will lose next year from the state's controversial budget and budget-repair legislation.
The city projects it will save at least $25 million a year - and potentially as much as $36 million in 2012 - from health care benefit changes it didn't have to negotiate with unions, as a result of provisions in the 2009-'11 budget-repair measure that ended most collective bargaining for most public employees.
That saving would be partly offset by about $14 million in cuts in state aid to the city in the 2011-'13 state budget, down from earlier estimates of more than $17 million.
As a result, the city would come out with a net gain of at least $11 million for its 2012 budget, slicing into the "structural deficit" created by costs rising faster than revenue, and reducing the spending cuts that Mayor Tom Barrett and the Common Council must impose.
That outlook contrasts sharply with Barrett's initial comments in March, after Gov. Scott Walker and the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau released figures on the extent of the aid cuts in Walker's budget.
At that time, Barrett said the combination of aid cuts, rising expenses, a property tax levy freeze and exempting public safety workers from health care and pension benefit changes "just makes our structural deficit explode."
Barrett now says the health care benefit changes are a major factor in helping the city balance its budget. But the Democratic mayor isn't giving the credit to Walker, the Republican who defeated him in November's gubernatorial election.
"It's a false question," Barrett said when asked whether Walker was right in his contention that his bargaining changes more than offset the impact of his aid cuts. Barrett said most people would agree that public employees should pay more of their health care and pension costs, but Walker didn't have to eliminate most of their collective bargaining power to do it.
Walker spokesman Cullen Werwie responded in an email:
"The fiscal reforms now in place, which were contained in the budget and budget-repair bills, give local units of government the tools necessary to balance their budgets. The reforms allow governments to save money not only on benefit contributions, but on changes to insurance provider, overtime rules and other measures. Not only do these reforms save money, but they also help improve government services."
Werwie noted that other local governments and school districts around the state were also realizing savings from the legislation.
The numbers don't lie.
Why would anyone vote tomorrow to reverse the accomplishments of the Walker administration by handing the State Senate over to the hapless Democrats?
It would be an enormous mistake.
The people of the state are counting on voters in districts with recall elections tomorrow to vote for prosperity and fiscal health for Wisconsin.
Vote for the Republican candidate.
3 comments:
This news and S&P downgrade of US debt make it clear that Walker's plans to put WI on a route of fiscal sanity are correct. You're right - these numbers don't lie. When Wisconsin remains fiscally viable and states like California and Illinois get their own downgrades, it will be even more clear.
I live in the 32nd district where Kapanke is going to lose to the Democrat Schilling...it's embarrassing to live in a place where people don't give a crap about saddling their kids with debt as long as they "get theirs" while the getting is good. Here's hoping we keep control of the Senate!
On a separate note, my wife asked me today: "Have you heard about the violence in Milwaukee at the State Fair - I can't believe it". She hadn't heard anything about it but someone at a store told her about it.
She hadn't heard about it on the news and it wasn't in our local paper (unless it was buried?).
She asked - why wasn't this in the news? Good question. The only reason I knew about it was from your blog initially, then other blogs later. I am getting to the point where I watch little/no news on TV and only use the newspaper to see who died.
Thanks for the blog.
It's really a shame that Kapanke will likely lose for doing his job - voting to balance the budget and not raise taxes.
Yeah, what an outrage!
Wouldn't it be great to go back to the Doyle way of out of control spending and debt?
Sure.
About the trouble at the STATE fair--
That is a statewide story. It certainly deserves to be reported throughout the state.
You're right about newspapers and TV news. What ever happened to informing the public on significant matters?
Post a Comment