If you're concerned about your privacy, you might want to think twice before signing a recall petition.
Brian Sikma, Media Trackers, reports:
EXCLUSIVE: GAB Admits to Major Privacy Flaw in Recall System
With the signature gathering phase of the Recall Walker effort only three days old, a flaw in the security of the system has been discovered. Under Wisconsin law there are no privacy protections for those who sign a recall petition. Those who sign a recall petition must give their name, address, and the date that they signed the document. That information could be given or sold to any political or business entity wanting a list of individuals who are opposed to Governor Scott Walker or are likely opposed to any of the reforms that he has put in place.
More ominously, someone could use the guise of the recall to gather information from complete strangers and then, with no intention of actually turning the petitions in, use that data to stalk individuals with the intent of carrying out a crime. Petition circulators are not required to register with the GAB or be certified as legitimate circulators. This stands in contrast to the practice of some municipalities to require individuals to receive certification as special registration deputies in order to register people to vote.
When asked if there was anything to prevent political opponents, potential crooks, or businesses from lifting information off of recall petitions and using it for private, malicious or criminal purposes, the Government Accountability Board admitted that no protections exist.
“There is no restriction on how recall petition information may be used,” Reid Magney, spokesman for the GAB told Media Trackers on Thursday morning.
I'm glad I don't have to worry about this right now.
I won't be signing any recall petition for Scott Walker or Rebecca Kleefisch or any of the other Republican targets of Big Labor.
Still, in terms of the future, it's troubling to think that personal information could be lifted from the petitions for malicious purposes. It's also concerning that "[p]etition circulators are not required to register with the GAB or be certified as legitimate circulators."
Anyone on the street could claim to be gathering signatures with no intent of turning them in as part of a recall effort.
Creepy.
Here's some advice:
Before signing a recall petition, Wisconsin citizens would do well to check the credibility of the circulator while remembering that there is nothing to prevent someone from using their personal information for a malicious or annoying purpose. Individuals looking for easy targets of criminal endeavors could find a wealth of information on recall petitions while annoying businesses and unscrupulous scammers could save themselves a lot of time and effort by simply abusing the information made public by petition signers.
2 comments:
I did not admit there is a “privacy flaw.” That is only Media Trackers' opinion. Transparency in elections (including petitions) is what keeps America’s elections free and open and honest.
Political participation has no expectation of privacy.
The world knows if you voted. The world knows if you sign a petition.
This is not a flaw. This is the design
One person's flaw is another person's design.
One person's fear or concern is another person's opportunity.
___________
"Political participation has no expectation of privacy."
WHAT?
That's a really disturbing thing for someone with the GAB to say.
We have private ballots. There definitely is an expectation of privacy.
Post a Comment