Blah, blah, blah. Jack Dorsey sort of attemtps to walk back his response heavy-handed response to a legitimate news story about a presidential candidate's corrupt dealings and lies. Dorsey was forced to acknowledge that his knee-jerk censorship strategy was not the best course to follow. This wasn't a sudden realization on Dorsey's part that he was wrong to try to censor his users in order to stop negative information about Biden from spreading. He realizes it was a stupid move and it could cost him a lot. Kiss that immunity goodbye.Our communication around our actions on the @nypost article was not great. And blocking URL sharing via tweet or DM with zero context as to why we’re blocking: unacceptable. https://t.co/v55vDVVlgt
— jack (@jack) October 14, 2020
1. Facebook & Twitter are censoring a bombshell story from reputable news sources on Joe & Hunter Bidens corruption; they’re trying to influence the presidential election.
— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) October 14, 2020
2. In my opinion, these Big Tech companies are effectively giving in-kind contributions to the Biden campaign.https://t.co/vT8VPL267H
— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) October 14, 2020
No amount of “great” communicating would make suppressing a newspaper article acceptable, especially since Twitter was for two years an open sewer of misinformation about Trump-Russia collusion. https://t.co/9EqRjCagfV
— Brit Hume (@brithume) October 15, 2020
No comments:
Post a Comment