Showing posts with label CENTCOM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CENTCOM. Show all posts

Monday, July 13, 2026

U.S. Forces Will Resume Naval Blockade Against Iran

TAMPA, Fla. — At the Commander in Chief's direction, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) forces will resume blockading maritime traffic entering and exiting Iranian ports on July 14 at 4 p.m. ET.

Friday, June 26, 2026

U.S. Retaliatory Strikes in Iran

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

Additional Self-Defense Strikes Against Iran Launched

Iran's leaders underestimate President Trump.

Thursday, May 7, 2026

Iran Attacks US Forces

TAMPA, Fla. — U.S. forces intercepted unprovoked Iranian attacks and responded with self-defense strikes as U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyers transited the Strait of Hormuz to the Gulf of Oman, May 7.

Iranian forces launched multiple missiles, drones and small boats as USS Truxtun (DDG 103), USS Rafael Peralta (DDG 115), and USS Mason (DDG 87) transited the international sea passage. No U.S. assets were struck.

U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) eliminated inbound threats and targeted Iranian military facilities responsible for attacking U.S. forces including missile and drone launch sites; command and control locations; and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance nodes. CENTCOM does not seek escalation but remains positioned and ready to protect American forces.
Pray for peace.

Monday, March 2, 2026

Iranian Regime's Ships Destroyed

CENTCOM Update - Fourth Service Member Dies

Sunday, March 1, 2026

Three U.S. Military Service Members Killed in Action

God be with the loved ones of the fallen.

Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps - Headquarters Destroyed

Actions have consequences.

Friday, February 2, 2024

U.S. Strikes Against Iranian Proxies

Finally, it was the "time of our choosing."

The Biden Regime chose to allow the IRGC to have time to prepare for retaliatory strikes.

Sunday, January 28, 2024

Iran Kills 3 U.S. Service Members, Injures Dozens in Jordan

Obviously, Iran isn't listening to Biden's alleged message. Nothing like this happened when President Trump was in office. He withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal and restored the "highest level of economic sanctions." Iran was dramatically weakened as a result.

Days after Biden's installation as president, he completely reversed President Trump's effective policies.

Simply put, Biden enabled Iran to kill Americans.

Biden's "'Don't' Doctrine" is deadly.

Tuesday, October 24, 2023

Dozens of U.S. Service Members Injured in Iraq and Syria

Antony Blinken claims we don't want war but if Iran or its proxies want war we'll give it to them.

None of this insanity was happening when President Trump was in office.
Biden and his regime are stumbling and bumbling our way into World War III.

Remember all the Trump haters said that was something President Trump was likely to do?

They were completely wrong. The alleged adults in the room are weak, floundering idiots.

Monday, October 23, 2023

Terrorist Bombing in Beirut - 40 Years Ago

Keep the sacrifice of these service members and their families in mind.

Friday, March 24, 2023

Iranian Drone Strike Kills American Contractor, Injures 5 Soldiers

None of this crap happened while President Trump was in office.

Biden and his regime are weak. The world knows it.

Isn't it great that Iran will have a nuclear bomb thanks to Obama and Biden?

Tuesday, December 20, 2022

Twitter Files, Part 8: *How Twitter Quietly Aided the Pentagon’s Covert Online PsyOp Campaign*

No wonder "Waffle House" stopped being a late night trending topic.

Monday, January 12, 2015

CENTCOM Hacked By ISIS

Cyber Jihad?





The Twitter account for CENTCOM was reportedly hacked by ISIS.




I got some screen grabs before the account was suspended.












Thursday, April 20, 2006

Zinni's Folly



Like so many other lib media darlings, former Clinton CENTCOM commander General Anthony Zinni has a history that proves inconvenient.

Zinni is being promoted as a principled man, daring to speak out against the evil Donald Rumsfeld, claiming "that he never saw any proof that Saddam possessed weapons of mass destruction."

But Zinni's own words have come back to haunt him. He has managed to discredit himself royally, and the lib media have pretended not to notice.

From Noel Sheppard of
NewsBusters:


[A]another bizarre oddity concerning the media's acceptance of Zinni's current position is the revelation that in the year 2000, Zinni actually briefed senior Clinton administration officials concerning a massive military strategy to overthrow Saddam. As reported by the Chicago Tribune on October 2, 2000: "Zinni has briefed senior administration officials on a secret war plan that details how the U.S. military, with limited allied help, would seek to topple Hussein. The effort would be massive, involving possibly as many as half a million troops, according to one knowledgeable official."

The article continued: "Although he has confidence in U.S. forces, Zinni has no illusions that such a scheme could win public support, considering the cost in lives and dollars it would almost certainly involve." Yet, Zinni expressed his discontent with the U.S. policy of containment at the time: "'Containment is what you do when you can't come up with the popular will to take decisive military action.'"

Now, if Zinni believed that Saddam either didn’t possess WMD at that time, or wasn’t an imminent threat to American security and sovereignty, why would he be offering a plan that would involve up to 500,000 American soldiers to overthrow the dictator? Moreover, if all this plan needed to succeed was "the popular will to take decisive military action," why would Zinni be opposed to a war that was initially waged with huge public support that was lacking when he offered his own overthrow plan three years earlier?

Sheppard asks, "[W]hy hasn’t one major media outlet uncovered this October 2, 2000 story, revealed its existence to the public, and asked Gen. Zinni why he felt so strongly about overthrowing Saddam in 2000, but thinks it was a mistake to do it in 2003?"

It's a legitimate question, and it perfectly illustrates the media's slant.

Another point that the lib media fail to raise is that there are some 8,000 active duty and retired generals. A total of seven have come out against Rumsfeld.

Not exactly a groundswell of opposition, is it?

Nonetheless, the media keep pushing the significance of the retired generals' mutiny.

Bud Hiller's take on Zinni's embarrassing lack of credibility is worth reading, if you want a sip of truth with that gulp of propaganda being served up by the lib media.

Hiller writes:


Zinni, who now complains that President Bush cherry-picked pre-war Iraq weapons intelligence and misled the country into going to war, warned six years ago that Saddam Hussein's WMD program was the biggest threat to U.S. interests in the Middle East.

"Iraq remains the most significant near-term threat to U.S. interests in the Arabian Gulf region," Zinni told Congress on March 15, 2000.

"Despite claims that WMD efforts have ceased," the general-turned-war-critic said, "Iraq probably is continuing clandestine nuclear research, retains stocks of chemical and biological munitions, and is concealing extended-range Scud missiles, possibly equipped with CBW \[chem-bio-weapons\] payloads."

Then, Hiller offers a taste of the side of Zinni that the lib media have been drooling over.
"What bothered me," Zinni told TV host Tim Russert, was that "I was hearing a depiction of the intelligence that didn't fit what I knew. There was no solid proof, that I ever saw, that Saddam had WMD.

"Now, I'd be the first to say we had to assume he had WMD left over that wasn't accounted for: artillery rounds, chemical rounds, a Scud missile or two. But these things, over time, degrade. These things did not present operational or strategic level threats at best."

In 2000, Zinni said, "Even if Baghdad reversed its course and surrendered all WMD capabilities, it retains the scientific, technical, and industrial infrastructure to replace agents and munitions within weeks or months."

Since Russert has been on an
anti-Rumsfeld crusade for years, I guess that's why he didn't dig up Zinni's past statements to challenge him on that dramatic about face.

It's this sort of stuff that reinforces the notion of how thoroughly invested the mainstream media are in assaulting President Bush and the Administration.

I think the "Rage against Rummy" army is due to retreat.