Thursday, May 17, 2007

Feingold Puts on a Happy Face

Russ Feingold must be dizzy from all the spinning that he's doing.

I get motion sickness just thinking about it.

His proposal to cut funding for the troops was roundly defeated yesterday.

Feingold is calling it a victory.

The lib media, naturally, are eagerly echoing his Pollyanna notions.


Read the spin:

Statement of U.S. Senator Russ Feingold
On the Growing Support for the Feingold-Reid Proposal
May 16, 2007

“Today the Senate took another step toward acknowledging the will of the American people, who want to end this misguided mission in Iraq. A majority of Senate Democrats are on the record clearly stating that the President’s Iraq policy is a failure and that we need to take real action to change course. Keeping 150,000 American troops in the middle of an Iraqi civil war both hurts our national security and impedes the ability to reach a political solution in Iraq. We must continue to ratchet up the pressure on the President and supporters of this irresponsible war to safely redeploy our troops from Iraq so we can refocus on those who attacked us on 9/11.”

Feingold and the media refer to the vote as if it reveals seismic shifts in opinion on the war in Iraq.

More Dems are going on the record in support of Feingold's surrender strategy. So what?

That just means that more Dems are wrong.

I really don't think Feingold reads the news. Does he get briefed on al Qaeda's activities IN Iraq?

It doesn't seem like it.

Feingold vows to keep pushing for American troop withdrawal, something that would ensure a massive humanitarian crisis in Iraq, and would likely spill over its borders to become a regional disaster.

He vows to repeat the mistakes of the disastrous, weak, impotent Jimmy Carter, and the many missteps of incompetent Bill Clinton, the guy who squandered opportunities to get Osama bin Laden.

Besides, what are the specifics of Feingold's plan to "refocus on those who attacked us on 9/11"?

Does he have a plan? Is he talking about al Qaeda?

Who does he think attacked us on 9/11?

Was it the Bush administration?

No comments: