First, about that little bell -- although annoying, it was probably the most exciting part of the debate. It was like a 1940s cartoon sound effect, not very high tech.
I think a few more sound effects could have been added to spark things up. Perhaps different animal sounds could have been used to signal when a candidate's time was up.
The dark horse, single-digits in the polls candidates seemed to have the most fun.
I suppose when you've got nothing, you've got nothing to lose.
COLUMBIA, S.C -- Under pressure from their rivals, the leading Republican presidential contenders defended their conservative credentials Tuesday night on abortion, gun control and tax cuts. "I ultimately do believe in a woman's right of choice, but I think there are ways we can look for ways to reduce abortions," former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani said in the second debate of the campaign.
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney said he had signed legislation banning assault weapons but added that he is a supporter of the rights of gun owners under the Second Amendment.
Arizona Sen. John McCain of Arizona said he would make sure that President Bush's tax cuts are made permanent, even though he voted against them when they were passed in 2001.
He said he did so because they were not accompanied by spending cuts.
All three men sought to stand their ground — and protect their standing in the presidential race — in a 90-minute debate at the University of South Carolina.
In a break from the campaign's first debate, some of the contenders who lag in the polls jabbed sharply at the front-runners.
Asked whether he believes McCain, Romney and Giuliani were soft on immigration, Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado said, "I do."
That wasn't all, he added quickly, saying his rivals had undergone recent conversions on abortion and other issues.
...Former Virginia Gov. Jim Gilmore bore in, as well. "Some of the people on this stage were very liberal in characterizing themselves as conservatives, particularly on the issues of abortion and taxes and health care," he said.
He singled out Giuliani for his position on abortion and said another rival, Mike Huckabee, had raised taxes while serving as governor of Arkansas.
Tommy Thompson seemed so dull and uncomfortable. He doesn't act like the same man that was elected as governor of Wisconsin for four terms. He needs to loosen up. Maybe he was spooked by his performance at the last debate and the controversy over his response to the homosexual issue.
Rather than being presidential candidates themselves, Tancredo, Huckabee, Paul, and Gilmore seemed to be more like disgruntled voters nipping at the ankles of the top three candidates.
I wonder if one of them will be tapped for the second spot on the ticket. Like George H.W. Bush's "voodoo economics" line directed at Ronald Reagan, it's possible that some of their remarks could come back to haunt them.
Although this was an obviously scripted line, I still liked it:
"We've had a Congress that's spent money like John Edwards at a beauty shop," said former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee said, mocking the Democratic presidential hopeful's penchant for $400 haircuts.
It was funny.
I liked Tancredo's "Jack Bauer" line, too. Gilmore's "Rudy McRomney" creation was more odd than funny.
Overall, I don't think Giuliani helped himself on the abortion issue. He still seems to be floundering.
And Romney and McCain were Romney and McCain.
So, who won?
Probably Fred Thompson.
But he needs to get off the bench and play. Thompson's non-running method of running for president is wearing a little thin.
4 comments:
I really don't quite get all the "mysticism" and fascination with Fred Thompson. I guess we conservatives need our "great white hope". I am beginning to tire of the romanticizing and yearning of the "good ol' days" of Reagan Republicanism. We aren't going to find another Reagan. I think we just need to quit looking for him and quit trying so hard to find someone to measure up emerge out of the Reagan shadow.
Perhaps different animal sounds could have been used to signal when a candidate's time was up.
Like an elephant trumpet or donkey hee-haw?
Frankly, if Fred Thompson is serious about being president, it's time for him to get off the sidelines.
He needs to get in the mix with the other candidates.
By sitting out, Thompson is benefiting from the "grass is always greener" phenomenon.
If he's going to be the party's savior, Thompson needs to start showing that he is capable of it.
And yes, I like the elephant and donkey idea.
The donkey would have worked well for Ron Paul after his 9/11 comments and for Rudy after his abortion responses.
Support Duncan Hunter. He is the most Conservative of the candidates. Mark Levin said this:
"I am becoming increasingly impressed with Duncan Hunter. He's poised, has a good grasp of the issues, and is consistent. He's solid on national security, and I like his idea about zero taxes for the manufacturing sector (although I don't believe I share his overall approach to economics). In my own mind, it would be nice if he'd move into the first tier of candidates. Being a member of the House, however, his name identification and public exposure remains limited."
Name identification is the only thing negative about Hunter, but it's a long time before the election. It can be resolved easier than convincing Conservatives that Rudy will ever be pro-Life.
Money is so important in political campaigns.
Guys like Duncan Hunter, qualified but lesser known people, are at such a disadvantage.
But who knows what the political landscape will look like in a year?
There are so many uncertainties. Things can change overnight.
Post a Comment