Tuesday, October 9, 2007

IF THIS DOESN'T BOTHER YOU, IT SHOULD

Democrats have been whining about the erosion of civil liberties for over six years now. It began with the 2000 Election fiasco and charges of disenfranchisement.

Even before President George W. Bush was inaugurated, the Left began its "throwing out the Constitution" and "King George" mantras and they have never let up.

Simply put, the Democrats are hypocrites.

From The American Spectator:

The Democrat Party senior leadership is feeling a Rush. Rush Limbaugh, that is. Late last week, DNC Chair Howard Dean, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, his deputy, Sen. Dick Durbin and Senatorial Committee chair, Sen. Chuck Schumer, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi all signed off in some form or another direct mail fundraising plans that will feature Limbaugh for their national party.

"'Don't let Limbaugh smear true patriotism,' that's the theme," says a DNC staffer. "We're not going to let Limbaugh determine what soldiers can talk and what soldiers can not."

Bad grammar and ill-informed opinions aside, the DNC hopes to raise millions of dollars of Limbaugh. "If we can't silence him, we should at least make some money to make his life more miserable in a Democratic-controlled Washington in 2008," says a Senate Democrat leadership aide.

When life gives you lemons, make lemonade.

And I guess when life gives you Limbaugh, make money.

The exploitation and manipulation and distortion of events to give a boost to fundraising is disturbing to be sure, but it isn't nearly as troubling to me as the Stalinist tactics of the Democrats and their war on free speech.

Others on the Democrat side are pushing ahead with other plans. Rep. Henry Waxman has asked his investigative staff to begin compiling reports on Limbaugh, and fellow radio hosts Sean Hannity and Mark Levin based on transcripts from their shows, and to call in Federal Communications Commission chairman Kevin Martin to discuss the so-called "Fairness Doctrine."

"Limbaugh isn't the only one who needs to be made uncomfortable about what he says on the radio," says a House leadership source. "We don't have as big a megaphone as these guys, but this all political, and we'll do what we can to gain the advantage. If we can take them off their game for a while, it will help our folks out there on the campaign trail."

The Democrats are orchestrating an effort to make private citizens "uncomfortable" for expressing their views.

They are calculating and scheming to silence the voices of Americans.

This is an outrage. It strikes at the heart of what America is about, what the Framers envisioned for their new nation.

Talk about an abuse and an attack on civil liberties!

___________________

On a related note--

The story of Graeme Frost.

Who is Graeme Frost?


He gave the Dems' radio address on September 29.

Read on.
Earlier in the week, his younger sister helped congressional Democrats sell expanded funding for the State Children's Health Insurance Program. Yesterday, with the White House threatening again to veto the legislation, it was Graeme Frost's turn to take up the cause.

The 12-year-old Baltimore boy, whose family relied on the government-funded insurance program after he and his sister were severely injured in a 2004 car accident, came to Washington yesterday to record the Democrats' weekly radio address.

"If it weren't for CHIP, I might not be here today," Graeme says in the address, to air today on stations across the country.

Popular with the states, the health insurance program, also known as SCHIP, covers 6.6 million children from modest-income families that are not poor enough to qualify for Medicaid. Congressional Democrats, with substantial Republican support, voted this week to cover 4 million more children, at an additional cost of $35 billion over five years.

President Bush, who says the measure expands the program beyond its original intent, plans to veto the bill. Forty-five House Republicans joined Democrats in the 265-159 vote to approve the expansion. Support fell short of the 290 votes needed to override a veto. The Senate vote was 67-29, with 18 Republicans supporting the bill.

Bush has proposed a $5 billion increase over a five-year period. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi described a "friendly conversation" with Bush yesterday in which she told the president she was praying that he would reconsider his veto. White House press secretary Dana Perino said Bush told Pelosi, "I'm going to veto this bill, and after that, let's see if we can sit down and come to a compromise."

Graeme, a seventh-grader at the Park School, has a message for the president.

"If I could speak to him, I would say, 'You have to sign this bill,'" he told reporters yesterday during his first visit to the Capitol. "I'm guessing he wants this money for Iraq. Our future isn't in Iraq. It's here."

The blond, bespectacled youth rose at 6 a.m. in his family's home in the Butchers Hill neighborhood of Baltimore yesterday for the trip to Washington.

Earlier in the week, two staffers from the office of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid had called to ask Graeme about his health care experience.

Graeme and his 9-year-old sister, Gemma, were passengers in the family SUV in December 2004 when it hit a patch of black ice and slammed into a tree. Both were taken to a hospital with severe brain trauma. Graeme was in a coma for a week and still requires physical therapy.

Bonnie Frost works for a medical publishing firm; her husband, Halsey, is a woodworker. They are raising their four children on combined income of about $45,000 a year. Neither gets health insurance through work.

Pretty dramatic, isn't it?

Enter the New Media, the Internet and talk radio, to relay, as Paul Harvey would say, "the rest of the story."

From NewsBusters:

The media piled on when President Bush used his veto pen on this children's health insurance bill. They tried to drop the absolute moral authority bomb on it big time and paint him as not caring about children. Now it looks like a little backfire is on the horizon.

On September 29th, 12 year old Graeme Frost of Maryland got to do the Democrats’ radio address, in which he told his story of how he and his sister were seriously injured in a car accident, and if it hadn’t been for SCHIP, they wouldn’t be here today. The Baltimore Sun did a story on the family, in which it stated the family couldn’t get health insurance through their work.

...There were many others in the media that swallowed the story whole with its hook. All of them were missing greatly in one major thing, facts.

Freerepublic's icwhatudo, managed to find plenty of missing facts using google:
"First, Mr. Halsey Frost, Graeme’s father, owns his own woodworking design studio, Frostworks, so his claim that he can’t get health insurance through work is shockingly deceptive. He chooses not to get health care for his family. Second, Graeme and his sister Gemma attend the very exclusive Park School, which has a tuition of $20,000 a year, per child. Third, they live in a 3,000+ square foot home in a neighborhood with smaller homes that are selling for at least $400,000. "

How could the Democrats be so careless?

Of all the children, of all the stories-- Why Graeme Frost?

The Dems have completely stepped in it, AGAIN.

Every uninsured kid in America should be as lucky as Graeme Frost.

While I'm sorry that sister Gemma and Graeme have suffered so greatly because of the car accident, it's ridiculous to suggest that it's inappropriate to let the facts be known about their living conditions and quality of life. It's not some kind of smear job.

The parents are clearly making choices that are leaving their family vulnerable. The parents are choosing to be irresponsible.

The Dems really gave President Bush and the Republicans a gift here. It proves Bush's wisdom in vetoing the bill.

The case of the Frost family is precisely why Henry Waxman can't stand talk radio.


This is precisely why we need it.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Can we talk about hypocrisy for a moment - yours, for instance?

On the one hand, you get mad at Democrats who didn't jump on the bandwagon to silence criticism of Gen. Petreus, but then get mad at the Democrats (including some who did condemn MoveOn's ad) for suggesting that Rush Limbaugh be held to the same standard when he criticizes real American soldiers who have volunteered to put their lives on the line for this country and have actually had the gall to question the wisdom of the President's policies.

Anyone who serves in this nation's armed forces deserves the utmost respect and admiration, whether they agree with your politics or not. A lot of soldiers support the war, but I suspect some do not, and if they choose to voice that opinion, then we should all respect that, since that is precisely that what they are fighting for in the first place - the freedom to speak, and worship and assemble - the freedoms guaranteed to us all by the Constitution of the United States - freedoms a lot of people suddenly seem all to willing to give up since 19 nut-jobs attacked us one morning 6 years ago.

Anyone who questions the patriotism of a soldier who served on the ground in Iraq or Afghanistan should be condemned, regardless of which side of the aisle they sit on, because nobody is more patriotic than those willing to serve.

Anonymous said...

Before you go and join in the fun of attacking a 12 year old boy, you should double check some of the relevant facts:

Graeme and his sister Gemma attend the very exclusive Park School, which has a tuition of $20,000 a year, per child

They attend these schools on scholarships - in other words, they don't pay that outrageous tuition.

They live in a 3,000+ square foot home in a neighborhood with smaller homes that are selling for at least $400,000

They bought the house 16 years ago for $55,000. The current value of other houses in the neighborhood does not mean they have that kind of money.

I live in Michigan, and our economy has been devastated by the hammering the US auto industry is taking. The Big Three shell out big bucks covering health care for their current workers and retirees, but their German and Japanese competitors don't have to. For me, health care isn't about handing out welfare or socialized medicine, it is about competing on a level playing field against foreign companies that don't have to cover the costs of benefits for their workers. We need to do something to bring the sky high cost of health care down and do something to make sure the 30-40 million uninsured have some form of basic coverage. Maybe a national plan like Mitt Romney put in place in Massachusetts and that Arnold S. has been talking about in California of requiring everyone to have insurance would work. I don't know the answer, but we need to do something before health care costs crush more of our industries.

Anonymous said...

On the Frost family, perhaps you should read another perspective:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/12/opinion/12krugman.html?ex=1349928000&en=57a21aca431ed598&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink

Mary said...

I'm not having "fun" attacking Graeme Frost.

I'm holding his parents accountable for their poor choices and irresponsibility.

I'm calling out the Dems.

Good grief.

Mary said...

To "anonymous, 7:45 PM, October 11, 2007"--

This is so frustrating.

1. I didn't "get mad at Democrats who didn't jump on the bandwagon to silence criticism of Gen. Petreus [sic]." I never said that MoveOn should have been silenced for its GENERAL BETRAY US ad. I think it was disgraceful that some Dems refused to honor the service of General Petraeus and condemn the group's despicable smear tactics of an American hero.

2. Limbaugh did NOT berate the troops.

3. "19 nut-jobs attacked us one morning 6 years ago." -- You sound like Ron Paul.

Anonymous said...

To "Mary", 11:42 AM, October 12, 2007.

Yeah, it's frustrating all right. It's frustrating when someone simply quotes the lies of the right-wing war machine, and is called out on the true facts that completely debunk them (one not noted here but that was in Krugman's Times piece and many other reputable outlets, was that Mr. Frost's "woodworking business" was dissolved in 1999).

The response of this person playing party to further publishing and perpetrating these lies? She defends herself (not the facts), Rush Limbuagh (who in fact did berate the troops), and insults the person making the comment (although not everyone be told they sound like Ron Paul would take be insulted, the intent is clear).

Typical of the Right (as is evidenced by the subject of this post - the attack on a 12-year old boy and his family): Ad hominem attacks. Given complete bankruptcy of ideas and ethics, they attack people, not ideas.

Neat debating tactic really. It was perfected by Joseph Goebbels..

Mary said...

Now I'm not frustrated.

I'm bored.

Anonymous said...

i think this hole shooting was really stupid it shouldent of happened and no matter what happens from here on out we the class of 2007 love jordane murray and we send out our love and respect