Thursday, February 19, 2009

Cartoon Protest, Boycott NY Post

UPDATE, February 24, 2009: STATEMENT FROM RUPERT MURDOCH

As the Chairman of the New York Post, I am ultimately responsible for what is printed in its pages. The buck stops with me.

Last week, we made a mistake. We ran a cartoon that offended many people. Today I want to personally apologize to any reader who felt offended, and even insulted.

Over the past couple of days, I have spoken to a number of people and I now better understand the hurt this cartoon has caused. At the same time, I have had conversations with Post editors about the situation and I can assure you - without a doubt - that the only intent of that cartoon was to mock a badly written piece of legislation. It was not meant to be racist, but unfortunately, it was interpreted by many as such.

We all hold the readers of the New York Post in high regard and I promise you that we will seek to be more attuned to the sensitivities of our community.

_______________

UPDATE, February 20, 2009: THAT CARTOON

From the New York Post:

Wednesday's Page Six cartoon - caricaturing Monday's police shooting of a chimpanzee in Connecticut - has created considerable controversy.

It shows two police officers standing over the chimp's body: "They'll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill," one officer says.

It was meant to mock an ineptly written federal stimulus bill.

Period.

But it has been taken as something else - as a depiction of President Obama, as a thinly veiled expression of racism.

This most certainly was not its intent; to those who were offended by the image, we apologize.

However, there are some in the media and in public life who have had differences with The Post in the past - and they see the incident as an opportunity for payback.

To them, no apology is due.

Sometimes a cartoon is just a cartoon - even as the opportunists seek to make it something else.

Al Sharpton responded:
Sharpton, who plans another rally for Friday, released a statement, saying he's not satisfied with simply an apology.

"The New York Post statement will be discussed by all of the leadership of the various groups that have mobilized and we will respond to it at the rally at 5 p.m. tomorrow outside of the New York Post.

"At this point there will be no cancellation of the rally and though we think it is the right thing for them to apologize to those they offended, they seem to want to want to blame the offense on those of whom raised the issue, rather than take responsibility for what they did.

"However, rather than engage as they are in name calling back and forth, we will make a collective decision on how to proceed. All of us can only wish the New York Post had taken a more mature position when the issue was first raised rather than belatedly come with a conditional statement after people began mobilizing and preparing to challenge the waiver of News Corp in the City where they own several television stations and newspapers."

The Post nailed it.
[T]here are some in the media and in public life who have had differences with The Post in the past - and they see the incident as an opportunity for payback.

To them, no apology is due.

Sometimes a cartoon is just a cartoon - even as the opportunists seek to make it something else.

_______________

This reminds me of the Muslim cartoon controversy of 2006.

These cartoons sparked outrage. Muslims around the world reacted with protests, boycotts, riots, violence, and murder. Remember?

Granted, the protesters targeting the New York Post aren't that crazed. Al Sharpton and his followers gathered peacefully today. No violence. No embassies burned. No deaths.

The similarity lies in the fact that the protest is an overreaction and thoroughly misguided.

Video.




Many black leaders and hundreds of people took part in the protest to cry "racism." Stunning.

From Newsday:

Protesters shouting, "Yes we can, shut it down" picketed outside the News Corp. building in midtown Thursday, a day after the company's New York Post newspaper ran a cartoon that they said depicted President Barack Obama as a chimpanzee shot and killed by police officers.

Led by the Rev. Al Sharpton, protesters marched in a loop inside police barricades on 6th Avenue, between 46th and 47th Street, and called for a boycott of the New York Post.

"Go to your newsstand and say, 'Do not sell it in our community,' " Sharpton said to protesters that police estimated to be 500.

One protester was Ashley Ames, 25, who is white. She said the Post is trying to set a racist agenda at a time when the country is trying to move beyond racial conflict. "They take us back," Ames said.

It's not surprising that Al Sharpton created a controversy. That's what he does.

It is disturbing that so many people, reasonable people, are buying what Sharpton is selling.

The cartoon does not depict Barack Obama as a chimp, plain and simple.

There's nothing racist about it.

As New York Post Editor in Chief Col Allan explained yesterday, "The cartoon is a clear parody of a current news event, to wit the shooting of a violent chimpanzee in Connecticut. It broadly mocks Washington's efforts to revive the economy."

Nothing more needs to be said by the Post. There's no offense here.

Obama did not write the stimulus bill. How could it be construed that the chimp is supposed to be Obama?

If there's anything offensive about it, it's that cartoonist Sean Delonas connects the case of Travis the chimp nearly mauling Charla Nash to death with the stimulus bill. That could be considered bad taste and inappropriate, given her condition.

What's particularly troubling about this is that racism does exist in this country. The protesters should choose their battles wisely and target real cases of racist behavior rather than phantoms.

All this sound and fury, signifying nothing.

______________

Newsday photo gallery of the protest.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

But it's okay to portray Palin as a pig with lipstick...

Where was all this outrage over Obama's comparison?

Love your blog, Mary!

Anonymous said...

Susan (rainy), you ask where was the outrage over the pig with lipstick comment. No one called for Palin to be shot. The cartoonist allegedy was not referring to Obama but to "Washington". Well, people make up Washington, so if not Obama, the cartoonist was still calling for some human being(s) to be shot.

Anonymous said...

It is incorrect to compare Obama to a chimpanzee. He's more like a baboon.

Hey, for eight years to left called Bush things like "Chimpy BusHitler." Well, they can dish it out but apparently they can't take it. Too bad, 'cause they're gonna have to take it! LOL

--chicopanther

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
It is incorrect to compare Obama to a chimpanzee. He's more like a baboon.

IN RESPOND TO THE ABOVE COMMENT:

With a comment like that it no wonder you went Anonymous....Why isn't there a vaccine for ignorance? A lot of it (IGNORANCE) can be avoided before one knows how to talk, write or post, if only they would come up with a vaccine to administered at birth...SMH

"That all are equal, all are free and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness."
President Barack Hussein Obama

Mary said...

It would have been horrible if a cartoonist depicted Obama as an ape.

The thing is he didn't.

Anonymous said...

Black people has historically been depicted as apes/monkeys. A real historian cannot deny this fact. We need to have zero tolerance for hate if we want to move forward as a united strong country. Any public statement of any leader being harmed/shoted should be considered a threat under our law. This cartoon was clearly suggesting the harm of the leader of this country and the writer/editor should be fired and prosecuted under the law.

Mary said...

Dana, I am aware of the slur and the history. And as I said, it would be a horrible, terribly degrading, racist thing to depict Obama as an ape.

That's just flat-out not what was done in the cartoon.

I respect the fact that you don't see it that way. And I understand that you respond to the cartoon on a very personal level because of your past experience.

We all carry around stuff from our pasts. Things trigger reminders of painful experiences. That's legitimate.

However, what's not fair is to claim that someone is using a racial slur when they aren't.

The Post has clarified that. It's not right to misconstrue the meaning or intent of the cartoon. It's unjust.

Look at this case. It's wrong to demonize the cartoonist and The Post over this. They shouldn't be held accountable for the sins of others.