Obama has made it official.
He could not have been more clear.
Obama told ABC's Jake Tapper, in an interview airing on Tuesday's Nightline, that he is on the side of the loons of the Occupy Wall Street movement.
Does that mean he accepts their sickening and pervasive anti-Semitism? Does he accept their calls for violence? Does he agree with their desire to have sex with animals? Does Obama have a problem with the rape? What about the theft?
In short, Obama said he embraces the Occupy Wall Street protesters, but he didn't comment on all their filth, foulness, crime, and lunacy. It's irresponsible of him to ignore the reality of the various "occupations" and remain silent. I find it repugnant.
Obama also made the absolutely absurd statement that the Occupy Wall Street Leftists/anarchists are similar to the Tea Party activists.
That's insane, truly insane.
Obama is either intentionally trying to deceive the American public, flat-out lying, or he is utterly clueless about the Occupy Wall Street protesters and the Tea Party activists.
Obama's remarks are disgraceful. His comments are as offensive as the disgusting demands and anti-Semitism of the Occupy anarchists.
Obama has made his bed.
I'm beginning to think he really doesn't want a second term.
Seriously.
Video.
Transcript
OBAMA: What I've said is that I understand the frustrations that are being expressed in those protests.
Uh, in some ways, they're not that different, uh, from some of the protests, uh, that we saw, uh, coming from the Tea Party, uh, you know, both on the left and the right. I think people feel, uh, separated from their government. They feel that their institutions aren't looking out for them.
Uh, and, uh, you know, the most important thing we can do right now is those of us in leadership letting people know that, uh, we understand their struggles, that we are on their side, and that we wanna set up a system in which hard work, responsibility, doin' what you're supposed to do, is rewarded. And that people who are irresponsible, who are reckless, uh, who, uh, don't, uh, feel a sense of obligation, uh, to their communities and, and to their companies and to their workers, uh, those folks aren't rewarded.
And, you know, I think that we're at the critical moment in this country where if, if we can regain some of the values that helped build this country that people, I think, long for, uh, where they feel that, uh, everybody gets a fair shake but we're also askin' a fair share from everybody, if we can go back to that then I think a lot of, uh, that anger and that frustration dissipates.
The anarchists that Obama is aligning with don't want to work hard. They don't want to be responsible.
The Occupy Wall Street protesters, with the masks and their faces hidden by bandannas, have nothing in common with the values of the people who built this country.
There is video clip after video clip of the protesters displaying their lunacy and extremism and radicalism.
For Obama to embrace those protesters is to position himself on the most radical fringes.
Is that really where he wants to be?
2 comments:
Wait. Which is it? Anarchists or Socialists? You can't really have it both ways as they are diametrically opposed.
I didn't use the word "socialist" in my post.
Post a Comment