Saturday, January 26, 2013

Obama: Recess Appointments Unconstitutional

Once upon a time, the United States of America had three branches of government.

The self-proclaimed king named Obama, leader of a cult, decided to ignore the separation of powers.

In an attempt to rein in this arrogant man, the judicial branch declared his behavior in violation of the Constitution.

That's big stuff.

If President George W. Bush had done what King Obama did, something no American president has ever done before, declaring the Senate to be in recess, the Leftists would be all over it.

From the Washington Times:

In a case freighted with major constitutional implications, a federal appeals court on Friday overturned President Obama’s controversial recess appointments from last year, ruling he abused his powers and acted when the Senate was not actually in a recess.

The three-judge panel’s ruling is a major blow to Mr. Obama. The judges ruled that the appointments he made to the National Labor Relations Board are illegal, and hence the five-person board did not have a quorum to operate.

But the ruling has even broader constitutional significance, with the judges arguing that the president’s recess appointment powers don’t apply to “intra-session” appointments — those made when Congress has left town for a few days or weeks. They said Mr. Obama erred when he said he could claim the power to determine when he could make appointments.

“Allowing the president to define the scope of his own appointments power would eviscerate the Constitution’s separation of powers,” the judges said in their opinion.

The judges said presidents’ recess powers only apply after Congress has adjourned a session permanently, which in modern times usually means only at the end of a year. If the ruling withstands Supreme Court scrutiny, it would dramatically constrain presidents in the future.

And the court ruled that the only vacancies that the president can use his powers on are ones that arise when the Senate is in one of those end-of-session breaks. That would all but eliminate the list of positions the president could fill with his recess powers.

...Noel Francisco, a lawyer at Jones Day who argued the case for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the company that challenged the NLRB appointments, said the court had returned to the Constitution’s intent, which was to make the recess appointment an emergency power for use only when Congress was not available.

“Issues like this — it’s not about protecting the Congress from the president and the president from Congress,” Mr. Francisco said. “The Constitution draws these lines ultimately to limit the government to protect the people.”
Will the U.S. Supreme Court allow the ruling to stand?

Perhaps, if Chief Justice John Roberts can figure out a way to define it as a tax.

Whatever, King Obama pushed it too far when he declared the Senate to be in recess.

Bottom line: If the Constitution is still the law of the land, if King Obama is bound by any limits of law, he abused his authority.


Related documents, via Mark Levin:
Landmark Legal Foundation

Landmark Legal Foundation
Landmark's filing in NLRB case (prior to oral argument-PDF)

US Court Of Appeals
The Court's official decision striking down Obama's unconstitutional appointments (PDF)

No comments: