Hong's Loss - Fraud?

This is nuts. He’s arguing with no evidence that Francesca Hong lost due to fraud. This kind of nonsense is destroying the Republican Party with independents. Don’t say something you can’t prove.

Hong lost because old boomers turned out at a MUCH higher rate than young people -… https://t.co/rBWaDo4oWi

— Wisconsin Right Now (@wisconsin_now) August 13, 2026

Is there proof that Francesca Hong lost and David Crowley won due to fraud? Should voters assume that fraud was employed to deliver a victory to Crowley?

No.

However, when USB sticks with election results go missing or need to be reloaded, there is doubt regarding the integrity of the results.

Why should we trust election "officials"? If the last ten years have taught us anything, it's that people in positions of authority will lie and cheat. The evidence of that is overwhelming. It would be irresponsible to simply accept that "officials" are doing the right thing.

When it comes to our elections, it is unacceptable to have alleged "human error" and late counting. That sows doubt. Given this sloppiness, questioning the results is legitimate.

Suggesting the possibility of the presence of fraud isn't an excuse or an easy way to explain a loss. It's understandable when the election process doesn't go smoothly, especially when the race is incredibly tight.