Wednesday, August 6, 2008

Hiroshima: 63 Year Later

On August 6, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. It was the beginning of the end of World War II.

It was a pivotal event. Truly, the world changed in an instant.

HIROSHIMA, Japan (AFP) -- The mayor of Hiroshima on Wednesday urged the next US president to work to abolish atomic weapons as the city marked the 63rd anniversary of the world's first nuclear attack.

Some 45,000 people, including Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda, gathered at a memorial to the dead within sight of the A-bomb dome, a former exhibition hall burned to a skeleton by the bomb's incinerating heat.

They stood up and offered silent prayers at 8:15 am, the exact moment in 1945 when a single US bomb instantly killed more than 140,000 people and fatally injured tens of thousands of others with radiation or horrific burns.

Delivering a speech at the memorial, Hiroshima mayor Tadatoshi Akiba noted the United States was one of only three countries which oppose a UN resolution submitted by Japan calling for the abolition of nuclear arms.

"We can only hope that the president of the United States elected this November will listen conscientiously to the majority, for whom the top priority is human survival," he said.

...A Chinese representative, a diplomat, attended the annual ceremony for the first time in a move welcomed by the city, which each year invites representatives of the world's eight declared nuclear powers to the event.

Previously India, Pakistan and Russia were the only nuclear powers that had sent representatives to the ceremony. The other declared nuclear states -- Britain, France, North Korea and the United States -- have never come.

This year a Chinese representative attended the ceremony for the first time. That was probably part of its Olympic makeover, coming-out effort.

Note that the U.S. has never sent a representative. That means that Bill Clinton blew off the event.

The Democrats and Barack Obama can't spin this as another instance of cowboy President Bush's bad relations with the world.

It does bug me that for the second year in a row, Akiba has used the ceremony as an opportunity to take swipes at the U.S., singling out America for condemnation, talking about his hopes for the "next U.S. president" to eliminate atomic weapons.

Why not target Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his threats to wipe Israel off the map? Why not chastise Iran for its defiance of the global community?

Surely, Iran poses more of a threat to peace than the U.S.

I'm not going to debate whether or not President Truman (D) made the right decision by giving the order to drop the bomb.

He did it and he ended the most horrific war in human history.

Starting at 8:15 AM on August 6, 1945, the threat of nuclear annihilation became real. It exists and always will.

63 years and counting....


_____________________

Last Saturday, the 63rd anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima was marked in Sydney, Australia.

An anti-nuclear demonstration took place, including a sign saying "No U.S./Israel Attack On Iran!"


Note the anti-U.S./ anti-Israel sentiment allegedly in the name of peace.


What about Iran's "militarism"?

Has Israel repeatedly threatened to wipe Iran off the map? Does Israel repeatedly state that Iran's destruction is at hand? No and no.

I haven't heard the U.S. threaten to decimate Iran or any other country.

So often, peace activists reveal that they aren't truly working for peace as much as they're protesting the U.S.

5 comments:

Dakotaboy said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Mary said...

I wrote: "I'm not going to debate whether or not President Truman (D) made the right decision by giving the order to drop the bomb."

Enough said.

The WordSmith from Nantucket said...

You might want to study your history before you say Truman Ended the war.

That's mighty arrogant of you, since there is no consensus regarding what could have happened had the bombs not been dropped.

My turn at presumptive arrogance: Good article for you.

What about Dresden? Recent estimates places the number around 40,000 killed; but the number used to be placed as high as 250,000- more than Hiroshima.

I am forever thankful for the sacrifice of our troops on the battlefield of WW2. But I will never support what happened in those two cities.


So....what? You think a land invasion would have spared more lives and shortened the length of the war? Way to support the troops on the battlefield and encourage their sacrifice!

Anonymous said...

"That's mighty arrogant of you, since there is no consensus regarding what could have happened had the bombs not been dropped."

Of course there is no consensus. I am not denying that at all. Nor am I not denying the influence the bomb had. But to say something political and catch all such as "Truman ended the war" is is distorting the truth.

My point is/was that they were civilians. My point is that we lowered ourselves to a place in war that should not have been. We took the war off the battlefield and slaughtered women and children & non enlisted men. We aren't terrorist who don't distinguish between combatants & non-combatants.

And I don't think our political leaders should ever ask our Servicemen & women to cross that line.

40,000 Dresdeners, 250,000 Japanese, 6 Million Jews; none to me is more or less evil. 2,000 American civilians is enough to be wrong. 3 Iraqi Civilians is enough to be wrong. Wordsmith, I cannot so easily blend the lines between those who enlist to serve & protect us and those of us who are civilians.

War, instead of increasingly bringing peace to civilians, has continued to take a larger and increasing ratio of Civilian casualties.

Wordsmith, You sound just like Stalin when he quoted Remarque saying, "the death of one man is a tragedy, the death of millions is a statistic"

Wordsmith, my dad was shot as a Marine in Vietnam, my best friend served in Korea and died stateside as a result of service in the Army, I have numerous friends in IRAQ. Don't take a cheap insult at me saying I hope the troops die. Everyone I know in the service is willing to make that sacrifice if need be for the future generations of our country.

Anonymous said...

Also,

Thank you for the article. It was very good. And very informative.

Best Regards.