Friday, October 8, 2010

ObamaCare Waivers

Ah, ObamaCare - that wonderful Democrat plan Russ Feingold is so proud to have backed, the one Wisconsinites and Americans across the country resoundingly rejected!

The terrible legislation hasn't even kicked in but we're already seeing symptoms from the damage it's done.

McDonald's, 29 other firms get health care coverage waivers

Nearly a million workers won't get a consumer protection in the U.S. health reform law meant to cap insurance costs because the government exempted their employers.

Thirty companies and organizations, including McDonald's (MCD) and Jack in the Box (JACK), won't be required to raise the minimum annual benefit included in low-cost health plans, which are often used to cover part-time or low-wage employees.

The Department of Health and Human Services, which provided a list of exemptions, said it granted waivers in late September so workers with such plans wouldn't lose coverage from employers who might choose instead to drop health insurance altogether.

Without waivers, companies would have had to provide a minimum of $750,000 in coverage next year, increasing to $1.25 million in 2012, $2 million in 2013 and unlimited in 2014.

"The big political issue here is the president promised no one would lose the coverage they've got," says Robert Laszewski, chief executive officer of consulting company Health Policy and Strategy Associates. "Here we are a month before the election, and these companies represent 1 million people who would lose the coverage they've got."

The United Agricultural Benefit Trust, the California-based cooperative that offers coverage to farm workers, was allowed to exempt 17,347 people. San Diego-based Jack in the Box's waiver is for 1,130 workers, while McDonald's asked to excuse 115,000.

The plans will be exempt from rules intended to keep people from having to pay for all their care once they reach a preset coverage cap. McDonald's, which offers the programs as a way to cover part-time employees, told the Obama administration it might re-evaluate the plans unless it got a waiver.

...The biggest single waiver, for 351,000 people, was for the United Federation of Teachers Welfare Fund, a New York union providing coverage for city teachers. The waivers are effective for a year and were granted to insurance plans and companies that showed that employee premiums would rise or that workers would lose coverage without them, Santillo says.



This stinks. In late September, just weeks before the midterm elections, the Obama administration tries to fix its mess of a health care plan with a band-aid for a chosen few.

The Democrat-Union Complex rears it's ugly head again.

Why can't we all get waivers? It's absolutely absurd to suggest that only those employees of these chosen 30 firms are at risk.

What's the deal with anyone losing insurance? The selling point of ObamaCare was that no one would lose their coverage. Guess that turned out to be total crap.

This nightmare (ObamaCare) is what Feingold brags about supporting.

This disaster (ObamaCare) is what Ron Johnson wants to repeal.

Any questions?

1 comment:

Harvey Finkelstein said...

All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.

Welcome to Animal Farm.

BTW - don't miss this...

http://www.courierpostonline.com/article/20101008/NEWS01/10080330/Dems-picked-spoiler-candidate