Friday, May 15, 2015

Russ Feingold 2016: SERIOUSLY?

So yesterday Russ Feingold made it official and announced via a lame YouTube video that he's in the 2016 U.S. Senate race to retake "his" old seat.

And alleged conservatives in Wisconsin spent the day whining about current U.S. Senator from Wisconsin Ron Johnson.

It is maddening.

I want to secede. Not from the U.S. Good grief.

I mean I can't take this crap anymore.

The idiots who claim to care about their alleged beloved country and claim to be conservative and claim to value their liberty are the same jerks who are responsible for all the damage Obama and the Democrats have done.

Had these irresponsible people kept Obama from a second term, something that was within reach, we wouldn't be on the verge of a nuclear Iran.

Run down the list of fresh hells Obama and his crew have delivered, all thanks to the alleged conservatives, both social and fiscal.

You make me sick.

Feingold is getting in because this is a presidential election. He thinks he can ride his way back to the Senate the way the disgraceful Tammy Baldwin got there. He may be right, because so many alleged conservatives are so selfish and so stubborn and so blind.

It's ridiculous to even entertain the notion that Ron Johnson is no better than the radical Leftist Feingold. IT IS ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS.

Has Johnson done all he promised?


Has Johnson been a disappointment in some ways?


BUT, would Russ Feingold have ever challenged Hillary Clinton on Benghazi the way Johnson did?


Feingold in the Senate compared to Johnson? It's a no-brainer.


To illustrate Feingold's extremism, I always bring this out from his days in the U.S. Senate. It deserves another look.

On September 26, 1996, during debate on partial-birth abortion, Feingold revealed just how radically pro-abortion he is.


Sen. Santorum: Will the Senator from Wisconsin yield for a question?

Sen. Feingold: I will.

Sen. Santorum: The Senator from Wisconsin says that this decision should be left up to the mother and the doctor, as if there is absolutely no limit that could be placed on what decision that they make with respect to that. And the Senator from California [Sen. Barbara Boxer] is going up to advise you of what my question is going to be, and I will ask it anyway. And my question is this: that if that baby were delivered breech style and everything was delivered except for the head, and for some reason that that baby's head would slip out -- that the baby was completely delivered -- would it then still be up to the doctor and the mother to decide whether to kill that baby?

Sen. Feingold: I would simply answer your question by saying under the Boxer amendment, the standard of saying it has to be a determination, by a doctor, of health of the mother, is a sufficient standard that would apply to that situation. And that would be an adequate standard.

Sen. Santorum: That doesn't answer the question. Let's assume that this procedure is being performed for the reason that you've stated, and the head is accidentally delivered. Would you allow the doctor to kill the baby?

Sen. Feingold: I am not the person to be answering that question. That is a question that should be answered by a doctor, and by the woman who receives advice from the doctor. And neither I, nor is the Senator from Pennsylvania, truly competent to answer those questions. That is why we should not be making those decisions here on the floor of the Senate.

That exchange is absolutely chilling, so chilling that Feingold had the Congressional Record altered.

Feingold actually refused to say that the life of a baby who survived a late-term abortion should be protected.

That's not just being pro-abortion. That's pro-infanticide.
Maybe you don't give a rat's ass about the sanctity of life. Maybe you're not a social conservative. Whatever.

Feingold's horrific pro-infanticide stance, which is exactly what he displayed, speaks far beyond that issue.

It's about Feingold's JUDGMENT and his CHARACTER.

Protecting innocent human life, the weak and the vulnerable, may not be Wisconsinites' main concern when they cast their votes for the U.S. Senate in 2016; but where Feingold stands on partial-birth abortion matters because it reveals so much about him and his lack of competence to serve, his absolutely terrifying radicalism.

If Feingold doesn't realize that an abortion SURVIVOR has the right to live, if his judgment and his character are that flawed, then he's certainly not fit to serve in the Senate.

If a conservative wants to challenge Johnson for the Republican nomination, fine. I'll take a look. But if the choice is between Feingold and Johnson, there is no question that Johnson should be reelected.

It's so clear.

Feingold is the enemy of conservatism, whether it's social or fiscal or whatever.

Allowing this radical back in the Senate would be an enormous mistake.

I'm so angry with the alleged conservatives allegedly acting on alleged principle, claiming to be so ticked off by Johnson that Feingold is a more appealing option.


Your values are so messed up.

Really, what the hell is wrong with you?

I don't know what to do. What have I been doing? Why have I have been working?

Am I supposed to sit back, collect my Obama phone, and be a slave to the government?

Give me a handout.

Work? Why?

Rugged individualist? Screw it.

When I think of all that American blood that has been shed for freedom and all the alleged conservatives, the people who allegedly know better, willing to participate in the collapse of the greatest country in history, it makes me want to secede - withdraw, break away and not look back.

No comments: