The Milwaukee Art Museum has acquired and plans to put on permanent display a picture of Pope Benedict XVI made of condoms.
From the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:
"Eggs Benedict" will be on display in the museum's permanent collection galleries.
Niki Johnson's portrait of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI, fashioned from 17,000 colorful condoms, made news-of-the-weird headlines in countries around the globe two years ago.
Now, that artwork is getting a serious nod. It has been acquired by the Milwaukee Art Museum, where it will be displayed when the museum reopens its permanent collection galleries, which are closed for renovation and a top-to-bottom reorganization.
Johnson's artwork, called "Eggs Benedict," was inspired by the former pope's 2009 comments about condoms while in Africa. He suggested condom use could increase the spread of AIDS.
"Particularly when you see it from the back, it kind of makes you realize what a crazy medium it is, but also just how artists mix color," said Brady Roberts, the museum's chief curator.
"You can do that with paint or you can do it with condoms," he said. "She's figured it out, and that's what she is so good at, creating images and sculptures with these everyday objects."
While there are many artworks in MAM's collection that are internationally known, Johnson's is the first to have achieved "global fame via the Internet," Roberts said.
I suppose it will be right next to the portrait of the "Prophet Muhammad," a mosaic made of little images of beheaded infidels.
No images of Muhammad in the museum's collection?
Sorry, my mistake.
Here's a post on "Eggs Benedict," from March 21, 2013:
Do you think this is a nice portrait of Pope Benedict XVI?Johnson makes a lame portrait. Fine. That's her right.
Would you judge it differently if you knew the "artist" made it with condoms?
The work is titled Eggs Benedict.
Not very respectful, is it?
The artist, Niki Johnson, is not praising Pope Benedict. She's condemning and mocking him.
From the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, once again a step behind and slow in its reporting:
A Milwaukee artist is drawing national attention, some of it negative, for one of her creations: a portrait of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI constructed out of 17,000 colorful condoms.Note to the JS: It's ridiculous to suggest that Johnson's commentary is at all in sync with Catholic teaching.
The piece by Milwaukee Institute of Art and Design instructor Niki Johnson, a kind of latch hook portrait, is a commentary on the artist's views on sex and Benedict's statements on condoms -- including the now famous 2009 quote while on a trip in Africa stating that condoms increase the spread of AIDS.
Local church officials did not immediately return telephone calls seeking comment. But it's been featured on the Huffington Post news website and described as "disgusting" by MediaBusters, a conservative website.
Ironically, Johnson's commentary on her blog is in some ways in sync with Catholic teaching. She says, in part: "Healthy sexual choices are at the root of creating a healthy nation." However, they clearly differ on what constitutes "healthy."
The church holds holds that sex is a gift to be expressed only between a man and a woman in the confines of marriage. Johnson, who lives in Shorewood, says: "Love in all of its colors, partners and kinky curiosities is to be enjoyed by those who are in it."
Read Johnson's post about her portrait.
Eggs Benedict exists because I believe it is my responsibility as an able bodied person living in our current cultural climate to incite further discussion about the direction our leaders point us in. As an artist, my thoughts manifest in my artwork best. It’s a pretty simple relationship. During the production of this piece I made many intentional choices; from selecting a cheerful moment from the Pope’s earlier years to reproduce, to going with a festive color palette, to putting great care into the making of the portrait to ensure that both the subject matter and the materials were on some level being celebrated in the midst of the questions that their combination raises. I made these choices because it is important to me that this piece opens more doors than it closes, by remaining both glorious and irreverent at the same time, if that’s possible. Like other portraits I have made, I see Eggs Benedict conceptually existing in a grey space between the black/white nature of political statements- creating room for a nuanced experience that has an added degree of complexity.There's nothing nuanced or complex about this work.
Johnson expresses her disdain for Pope Benedict, something she has the right to do.
But let's be honest. Johnson isn't opening any doors to discussion. Her portrait is not operating in a "grey space." It's perfectly black and white.
Personally, I don't find Johnson's portrait to be nearly as offensive to me as a Catholic as Piss Christ, Andres Serrano's photograph of a crucifix submerged in his own urine. Adding insult to injury was the fact that the National Endowment for the Arts was supporting Serrano's "art," that tax dollars had gone to the creator of Piss Christ.
The offensive "art" was defended by liberals. It was deemed artistic expression, not desecration. Although it caused some uproar and offended some Christians in the U.S. in the late 1980s, there were no riots. The taxpayer funds supporting it irritated many; but there were no fires, no calls for beheadings.
Like Serrano, I think Johnson wanted attention. She got it. She knew the way to get noticed would be to mock the Pope.
To some, she's a hero. To others, she's intolerant and hateful.
Bottom line: The Constitution doesn't protect us from being offended. It protects freedom of expression.
Having it on permanent display at the Milwaukee Art Museum?
I don't think that's a good idea. The purpose is to offend.
Get a portrait of Muhammad up there and then I'd understand the offensive Pope Benedict portrait's place in a permanent gallery. Have a gallery focusing on attacks on religion and faith. Be inclusive, not just targeting Christians.
The Milwaukee Art Museum must acquire some more offensive religious pieces, from all faiths.
I'd be OK with that. I don't like the fact that just Catholics can be mocked by the museum with impunity. Spread the hate around.