Showing posts with label David Axelrod. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Axelrod. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 15, 2026

Myopic Pope Leo

Pope Leo should stop listening to David Axelrod.

Thursday, April 9, 2026

Pope Leo XIV Meets With David Axelrod

I hope they were talking about saving David Axelrod's soul and not scheming about Leftist politics.

Saturday, July 6, 2024

David Axelrod: Biden's ABC Interview 'Sad'

Selfish, power-hungry, cruel Jill Biden should end this now. Since she won't, Democrats in the House and Senate must.

Sunday, November 5, 2023

David Axelrod Pushes Biden to Drop Out of 2024 Race

Democrats are in disarray.

Saturday, December 17, 2016

Obama: 'Most Catholic of Presidents'



This is crazy.

Any media outlet reporting that Obama is, in fact, the "most Catholic of presidents" is dealing in FAKE NEWS.

From CNSNews:
On the December 15 edition of the "Axe Files" podcast, White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough told David Axelrod the following about President Barack Obama. "I think this is the—our most Catholic of presidents. And I mean that by capital C Catholic, in what I see and what he does every day. It's not to say that he's—does everything entirely consistent with Catholic teaching. That's not the idea."

We'll, yes that is the idea. When someone says that Obama is "our most Catholic of presidents," surely the record should speak for itself. Here are some of Obama's views and policies that McDonough needs to explain.
CNSNews provides a long list of items showing that Obama isn't remotely the "most Catholic of presidents," not even close.

Some examples:
--Before he was elected in 2008, he said he would sign a bill, the Freedom of Choice Act, that would have forced Catholic hospitals to perform abortions.

--One of the first executive orders Obama signed after being sworn in on January 20, 2009 was to overturn the Mexico City Policy that denied federal funding of private organizations that perform and promote abortions abroad.

--On January 29, 2009, Obama said he looked forward to restoring U.S. aid to the U.N. Population Fund that pays for abortion.

--Obama supports partial-birth abortion, the procedure where a baby who is 80 percent born has his head pierced with a scissors.

--In 2008, Obama said the biggest mistake he ever made was to side with the parents of Terry Schiavo: they petitioned a federal court to allow their daughter food and medicine needed to live. Obama reversed himself, thus siding with those who said, just "let her die."

--When Obama spoke at Georgetown University in April 2009, his staff insisted that all religious symbols in the room where he was to speak had to be covered with a drape.

--Obama fought U.S. bishops for years—and is doing so now—trying to force Catholic non-profits to pay for abortion-inducing drugs, contraception, and sterilization in their healthcare plans.
Bill Donohue asks: "If Obama is the 'most Catholic of presidents,' then why has he spent the last eight years sticking it to Catholics and the Catholic Church?"

Obama is not the most Catholic of presidents.



Sunday, November 14, 2010

David Axelrod, Obama, and Tax Cuts

Last week, David Axelrod told Sam Stein of the Huffington Post that Obama was going to back down on the Bush tax cuts.

President Barack Obama's top adviser suggested to The Huffington Post late Wednesday that the administration is ready to accept an across-the-board, temporary continuation of steep Bush-era tax cuts, including those for the wealthiest taxpayers.

That appears to be the only way, said David Axelrod, that middle-class taxpayers can keep their tax cuts, given the legislative and political realities facing Obama in the aftermath of last week's electoral defeat.

"We have to deal with the world as we find it," Axelrod said during an unusually candid and reflective 90-minute interview in his office, steps away from the Oval Office. "The world of what it takes to get this done."

"There are concerns," he added, that Congress will continue to kick the can down the road in the future by passing temporary extensions for the wealthy time and time again. "But I don't want to trade away security for the middle class in order to make that point."

It has been widely assumed that the president would have to accept an across-the-board deal of some kind, but Axelrod's remarks were the first public confirmation of that fact -- and by a figure regarded as closer to Obama than any other White House staffer.

Axelrod, on FOX News Sunday this morning, went wobbly on his previous statements.
[C]ontra what he told our Sam Stein, Axelrod says that Obama's position has not changed on tax cuts, he rules out a permanent extension of ALL the tax cuts. Just an extension of the "middle class" tax cuts. We don't have the money to spend on "millionaires and billionaires," he says. But what about a TEMPORARY extension of those upper level tax cuts? Axelrod says he "won't negotiate" that on the air. (He also won't answer that question...so, I guess the White House is open to it?)

Wallace goes fishing, and gets Axelrod to say that middle class tax cuts should continue, but we cannot "afford to permanently extend the tax cuts" on those upper income earners.

Let me translate from the original bullshit: The White House would LIKE to keep the "middle class tax cuts" and end "permanently" the tax cuts on the rich. But they'd probably compromise on a "temporary" extension of the latter. They have no leverage, though, AT ALL, because they gave all that up by punting before the election. So, they'll be forced to accept a "permanent" extension of all. And the policy people will say, "Veto that sucker" and the political people will sigh and say, "Sign that please." And who wins those fights?

Of course, the folks at the Huffington Post have an Axe to grind, given Axelrod's exploitation of the outlet for the White House's trial balloon.

Axelrod also was on Meet the Press today talking taxes.

From Reuters:

President Barack Obama will not go along with a permanent extension of tax cuts for the wealthiest, presidential adviser David Axelrod said on Sunday, without closing the door to a temporary continuation.

"There's no bend on the permanent extension of tax cuts" for the wealthiest, a Republican proposal that Obama has long opposed, Axelrod said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

He did not respond directly when asked whether Obama would agree to tax legislation that couples a temporary extension for top earners with making permanent the current breaks for the middle-class.

"We are looking forward to sitting down with (congressional) leaders," Axelrod said. Obama has invited a bipartisan group of congressional leaders to dinner at the White House this week.

Forget the class warfare. Raising taxes is no way to stimulate the economy.

Obama is so busy playing politics that he's failing miserably as an effective executive.

Thursday, August 20, 2009

AKPD, GMMB, David Axelrod -- OBAMA CORRUPTION

The corruption that is permeating the Obama administration's health care push is being addressed by the lib media now.

It involves secret deals with Big Pharma and the questionable dealings of David Axelrod with AKPD and GMMB.

Firms with Obama ties profit from health push

President Barack Obama's push for a national health care overhaul is providing a financial windfall in the election offseason to Democratic consulting firms that are closely connected to the president and two top advisers.

Coalitions of interest groups running at least $24 million in pro-overhaul ads hired GMMB, which worked for Obama's 2008 campaign and whose partners include a top Obama campaign strategist. They also hired AKPD Message and Media, which was founded by David Axelrod, a top adviser to Obama's campaign and now to the White House. AKPD did work for Obama's campaign, and Axelrod's son Michael and Obama's campaign manager David Plouffe work there.

The firms were hired by Americans for Stable Quality Care and its predecessor, Healthy Economy Now. Each was formed by a coalition of interests with big stakes in health care policy, including the drug maker lobby PhRMA, the American Medical Association, the Service Employees International Union and Families USA, which calls itself "The Voice for Health Care Consumers."

Their ads press for changes in health care policy. Healthy Economy Now made one of the same arguments that Obama does: that health care costs are delaying the country's economic recovery and that changes are needed if the economy is to rebound.

There is no evidence that Axelrod directly profited from the group's ads. Axelrod took steps to separate himself from AKPD when he joined Obama's White House. AKPD owes him $2 million from his stock sale and will make preset payments over four years, starting with $350,000 on Dec. 31, according to Axelrod's personal financial disclosure report.

A larger issue is a network of relationships and overlapping interests that resembles some seen in past administrations and could prove a problem as Obama tries to win the public over on health care and fulfill his promise to change the way Washington works, said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, a government watchdog group.

"Even if these are obvious bedfellows and kind of standard PR maneuvers, it still stands to undercut Obama's credibility," Krumholz said. "The potential takeaway from the public is 'friends in cahoots to engineer a grass roots result.'"

These revelations come at a terrible time for Obama, when citizens are becoming more informed on ObamaCare and are, of course, rejecting it.

In addition to the policy objections that many Americans have about government-run health care, we now have corruption issues in the White House.

All the "hope and change" rhetoric that Obama used to sway Americans to elect him seems very, very empty now.

Obama isn't looking like a transcendent, new breed of politician.

He's looking like a terrible disappointment.

The opposition Obama faces from the American people on his health care scheme is part of our democratic process. People have policy disagreements. Debate is to be expected in a free society.

What's really bad for Obama is the corruption that's bubbling to the surface. That's inexcusable.

It provides another reason for Americans to be extremely wary of Obama, his administration and the Democrats.

They have shown they can't be trusted. Their word is not good.

It's been a long, LONG seven months of Obama.


Wednesday, August 19, 2009

David Axelrod and AKPD

Obama promised he would change Washington.

I guess it's true that the more things change, the more they stay same.

Obama vowed to run an ethical White House.

Enter David Axelrod...

From Rick Moran, American Thinker:

David Axelrod, who is fond of calling the town hall protestors astroturf mobs, appears to have a few conflict of interests with the health care reform proposals being put forward by his boss, President Obama.

Axelrod headed up AKPD Message and Media - a firm that the Obama presidential campaign paid more than $340 million to place ads for the candidate. He resigned on December 31 to join the administration, and the firm is now run by his son.

The problem is, he is still owed money by the firm. And wouldn't you like to know where that money is coming from?

How about from a coalition of businesses calling themselves "Healthy Economy Now (HEN)" connected to the health care debate?

Moran cites an article by Timothy J. Burger, Bloomberg:
HEN’s other members, according to its Web site, are the AARP, the biggest advocacy organization for retirees; the Advanced Medical Technology Association; the Business Roundtable; Families USA; the Service Employees International Union, all based in Washington, and the American Medical Association based in Chicago. PhRMA represents 28 drugmakers, including New York-based Pfizer Inc. and London-based GlaxoSmithKline Plc.

That's an interesting group, isn't it?

From Politico:

Republicans are aggressively seeking to capitalize on the AKPD connection, and the House Republican Conference distributed a one-page talking points memo Tuesday asserting the White House-PhRMA deal raises “serious questions as to whether the drug lobby is helping to bankroll a multimillion dollar severance package for one of the President’s senior advisers.”

The memo points out that the drug industry will profit handsomely from the deal and asks whether Axelrod “recused himself from the PhRMA ‘deal,’ or will he work to defend an agreement with an industry that is directly funding his son’s work, and indirectly funding his own $2 million severance package?”

Republicans may be "aggressively seeking to capitalize on the AKPD connection" to score political points. I understand that.

But isn't it a legitimate issue?

What really bothers me is the hypocrisy of Obama and his buddies, the holier-than-thou crap.

The Culture of Corruption is thriving at the White House.

Hope. Change. BS.

Friday, August 14, 2009

Major Garrett and Robert Gibbs: David Axelrod Health Care E-Mail

The White House is on defense in the health care debate.

As more people learn about the proposed goverment-run health care bill, more people oppose it.

In a desperate attempt to fight back, David Axelrod, senior adviser to Obama, penned an e-mail that the White House hopes will go viral.


From USA Today:

The White House is now hoping that a viral chain letter will help revive prospects for a health care overhaul.

Officials are forwarding an e-mail authored by top Obama adviser David Axelrod and urging recipients to pass it along. The missive includes a handy list of "8 ways (health care) reform provides security and stability to those with or without coverage, 8 common myths about reform and 8 reasons we need health insurance reform now."

...The e-mail also provides a link to the White House website "Health Insurance Reform Reality Check."

..."Across the country we are seeing vigorous debate about health insurance reform," Axelrod writes. "Unfortunately, some of the old tactics we know so well are back -- even the viral emails that fly unchecked and under the radar, spreading all sorts of lies and distortions."

He adds: "Right now, someone you know probably has a question about reform that could be answered by what's below. So what are you waiting for? Forward this email."

That's typical stuff.

What's not typical is that the e-mail has ended up in the inboxes of people who never asked to receive mailings from the White House.

There's something fishy about that.

How did the White House get the addresses?

Major Garrett tangled with White House press secretary Robert Gibbs about the unsolicited e-mails Americans are receiving.


Transcript, Press Briefing, August 13, 2009
Q Speaking of the e-mail, how was the list for who would receive it determined?

MR. GIBBS: I believe it's for people that have signed up to receive e-mail updates from the White House.

Q The reason I ask is I have received e-mails from people who did not, in any way, shape, or form, seek any communication from the White House, who have never registered on OFA, who have never registered on a campaign Web site --

MR. GIBBS: Well, hold on, let's --

Q Let me finish my question, let me finish my question.

MR. GIBBS: No, no, no, but let's be clear, because --

Q Let me finish my question.

MR. GIBBS: No, no, no, but let's be clear before you -- I'm going to give you a chance to finish your question. You've done this a couple of times, Major, and I just want to be very clear, okay. OFA -- no, no, no, no, don't look funny. OFA, whether Obama for America or Organizing for America has nothing to do with, never has had anything to do with what -- if you sign up for, through whitehouse.gov, to receive e-mails, so let's just -- the reason I interrupted you is because I want you to rephrase your question that doesn't continue to assume that --

Q Well, all I'm trying to get at is --

MR. GIBBS: -- somebody is violating the law and mixing up political --

Q -- I receive e-mails from people who have never, ever signed up for anything related to this White House, Senator Obama as a candidate, Senator Obama as anything, and have received e-mails from David Axelrod. How could that be?

MR. GIBBS: I'd have to look at who you said got the e-mail.

Q I mean, do you seek other pieces of information identifying who might be curious about health care outside of people who have asked for e-mails?

MR. GIBBS: I'm sorry, say that again.

Q Do you in any way seek databases or information about people who might be interested in health care?

MR. GIBBS: I will certainly check. I will certainly check. I am not under that impression. But again --

Q I mean, folks have emailed me -- I just want to know -- would like to know how they get an e-mail from the White House when they have never asked for one.

MR. GIBBS: I'd be interested to see who you got that e-mail from and whether or not they're on the list. I don't --

Q May I follow up politely on one of Major Garrett's --

MR. GIBBS: Well, let me -- let me finish needling Major.

Q -- this row, please.

MR. GIBBS: Again, I just want to be -- but I just want to be very --

Q So what you're telling me is I need to give you these people's e-mails so you can check them on a list? I'm just asking.

MR. GIBBS: Well, you're asking me if they're on a list.

Q No, they're telling me --

MR. GIBBS: If you can figure out a different way of checking without asking me to double-check the name, I'm happy to --

Q Perhaps I'm not phrasing this correctly. They're telling me they're not -- they can't be on a list because they never asked for an e-mail from the White House.

MR. GIBBS: Right, but what I'm saying is I don't -- I'd have to look and see --

Q So there's no -- you don't have an explanation for how someone who never signed up and never asked for anything from the White House would get an e-mail from David Axelrod?

MR. GIBBS: Well, I hesitate to give you an answer, because you might impugn the motives of the answer.

Q Why would you say that?

MR. GIBBS: Because of the way you phrased your follow-up. I'd have to look at what you got, Major. I don't -- I appreciate the fact that I have omnipotent clarity as to what you've received in your e-mail box today.

Q You don't have to have omnipotent clarity. You don't have to impugn anything. I'm telling you what I got -- e-mails from people who said they never asked anything from the White House --

MR. GIBBS: And I'm simply saying --

Q -- and yet they received something.

MR. GIBBS: We can -- let me go to someplace else that might be constructive.

Very fishy indeed.

Garrett discussed the issue with Greta Van Susteren.

Video, from Breitbart.



MAJOR GARRETT: I have offered to give to Robert Gibbs and the White House some of the e-mails from people who've said they never asked for anything from the White House, never subscribed, never signed up. None of these e-mails that they have identified to me were forwarded to them.

I know many... I've gotten a lot of e-mails from people who think I'm a complete Internet idiot. 'Of course these were forwarded.' No, what I'm saying is these people contacted me because they were not forwarded. They received them directly from the White House.

All right. I've offered to give those to the White House to find out the answers to the questions I posed today.

At this hour, Greta, and I hope the situation changes, I've heard nothing back from Robert Gibbs. And I'm not alleging anything nefarious. I'm just trying to find out an answer to what is basically a simple question. If you've never asked the White House for anything about health care or any other subject...

GRETA VAN SUSTEREN: Where did they get your name?

GARRETT: How did they receive an e-mail? That's all I'm asking.

...

GARRETT: This may have to go to a Freedom of Information request. I don't know. All I know is... and Robert Gibbs, after the briefing, he and I had what I would describe as a spirited conversation.

He said, 'You should take what I say at the podium truthfully.'

I do. I always have.

He said to me at the podium, 'Provide the e-mails.'

I'm prepared to do that. I'm more than happy to discuss this anytime, anyplace.

Very strange.

The Obama administration so often acts as if it has something to hide.

Obama hasn't just broken his campaign promise of transparency. He's shattered it. He's pulverized it.

_________________

UPDATE, August 14, 2009: Major Garrett still has heard nothing from Robert Gibbs.