Supreme Court Rules Ballroom Construction Can Continue

BOOM! The Supreme Court just told the historic-preservation lawyers to get out of the way.

Five to four. Construction continues. Crews are already on 20-hour days.

This was not a love letter to the ballroom. The Court said the National Trust likely has no standing to sue.
They… pic.twitter.com/zrjvmk1HhC

— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) August 31, 2026

John Robert is a terrible Chief Justice.

Chip Roy: Pause All Immigration

Rep. Roy: "Today the Supreme Court manufactured out of thin air a complete abomination of a ruling by the Chief Justice suggesting that you can simply become a citizen from being born on dirt, thereby validating the abhorrent practice of baby factories.

This leaves us no choice… pic.twitter.com/uIQVS8tJsk

— Rep. Chip Roy Press Office (@RepChipRoy) June 30, 2026

It would be easier to pause all immigration than amend the Constitution.

Clarence Thomas Dissent and John Roberts Opinion

I just finished reading Clarence Thomas's dissent. I encourage you to do the same. If you take the time to read Roberts's opinion and compare it to Thomas's dissent, Thomas completely outclasses Roberts. His is a step-by-step history and constitutional lessen that brilliantly…

— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) June 30, 2026

John Roberts is a terrible chief justice.

Ways to Deal With SCOTUS Birthright Citizenship Ruling

For decades after the 14th Amendment was ratified, it was understood that American Indians born in America were not American citizens. It took an act of Congress to make them citizens.

The Roberts/Barrett take on the 14th is entirely inconsistent with actual history, language,…

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) June 30, 2026

Several ways forward here given the choice of Roberts/Barrett to nullify the 14th Amendment and extra-constitutionally replace it with their own language:

1) Nullification. States issue birth certificates, and they can just stop issuing them to non-citizens. Roberts/Barrett can…

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) June 30, 2026

Interesting suggestions.

Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship

Justice Alito is FUMING. In a blistering dissent, he warns the Court's new ruling could hand U.S. citizenship to the child of an enemy nation -- someone "inculcated with hatred of this country" who can travel the world on an American passport and cannot be stripped of citizenship… pic.twitter.com/qANRAIRk59

— Sean Hannity 🇺🇸 (@seanhannity) June 30, 2026

Historic mistake by the Supreme Court.

Once again, John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett join the crazed Leftist activists Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Brett Kavanaugh also joined to strike down President Trump's executive order, "but dissented in part, saying Trump violated federal law, not the Constitution. Kavanaugh's opinion lays the groundwork for Congress to create birthright exceptions for the children of immigrants by changing the law."

NEW: Justice Clarence Thomas issues a scathing 91-page dissenting opinion after the Supreme Court struck down President Trump's birthright citizenship order.

"The Court today takes the extraordinary step of holding facially unconstitutional the President's Order excluding from… pic.twitter.com/cpaF73r3Gj

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) June 30, 2026

Supreme Court Rules FOR Mail-In Vote Fraud

BREAKING: The Supreme Court rejects a Republican-led challenge to counting some mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day.

In a 5-4 decision, the Court ruled that states can continue counting ballots received after Election Day if state law allows it and the ballots meet… pic.twitter.com/PBQxfcriWV

— Fox News (@FoxNews) June 29, 2026

Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts should be ashamed of themselves.

A Third Major Supreme Court Leak

OUTRAGE: Americans are DEMANDING answers after the The New York Times obtained and published “secret” internal memos from the U.S. Supreme Court — marking the third MAJOR leak from the high court in the last four years.

Kerri Urbahn: “Which is really unheard of from the U.S.… pic.twitter.com/g3LO1MI9xG

— RedWave Press (@RedWavePress) April 20, 2026

KERRI URBAHN: I think these leaks tend to go in one direction, and it is to undercut what the conservative wing of the Supreme Court is doing or in the process of doing.

Democrats/Leftists are ruthless.

Chief Justice John Roberts must act.

Trump Not Happy With Gorsuch, Barrett, and Roberts

pic.twitter.com/fSxgGDjTCL

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) February 21, 2026

pic.twitter.com/sYhy35n2hY

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) February 21, 2026

John Roberts Is a Disgrace

John Roberts sat around and did nothing while U.S. citizens were thrown in solitary confinement without a trial for years, but when a foreign terrorist illegal was deported, Roberts suddenly became very concerned with due process.

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) April 22, 2025

For First Time In History, Supreme Court Has 5 Female Justices https://t.co/T9n5ZWttOZ pic.twitter.com/Heo6CrZ3zc

— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) April 22, 2025

From the Babylon Bee:

"It's humbling and exciting to be a part of this group," Chief Justice Roberts said in a statement. "While the court has been graced by several strong women over the years, this is the first time there have been five of us sitting on the court at the same time. Having a female majority on the Supreme Court is an amazing accomplishment. We did it, ladies!"

Historians agreed that the female majority was a true milestone for the court, opening the door for many landmark decisions. "It will be interesting to see where this leads the country," said Professor Harold Benson, who has studied both the Supreme Court and women for many years. "We've heard rumors that the court may rule in favor of the death penalty in cases where toilet seats are left up. The male justices on the court simply won't have enough votes to strike it down."

At publishing time, in a long-awaited Supreme Court ruling, despite insiders believing them to be mad about something, the five female justices issued a joint opinion that simply read, "It's fine."

The Amy Coney Barrett Problem

Barrett, again. I’ve had her pegged for some time now. Awful.https://t.co/nbe3ZlQuVM

— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) April 8, 2025

Thanks to Barrett and Roberts, the Supreme Court is in Leftist hands. Roberts is unreliable and unpredictable. Barrett has completely jumped ship and tossed out the Constitution.

John Roberts Blocks Rogue Judge's Order to Return Kilmer Abrego Garcia to U.S.

If Chief Justice John Roberts won't rein in these activist judges sabotaging President Trump's Article II powers, Congress will.

Judicial sabotage is leading us into a constitutional crisis.

It's always great joining @megynkelly pic.twitter.com/XPnTUs7sh5

— 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 (@mrddmia) April 7, 2025

BREAKING: SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts has temporarily blocked the district court’s order that Salvadoran National Kilmer Abrego Garcia be returned to the U-S by midnight tonight.
He ordered Abrego Garcia’s lawyers to respond by Tuesday at 5pm ET. pic.twitter.com/NSM03mo52d

— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) April 7, 2025

I'm surprised that John Roberts actually decided to do his job. Very unusual.

Mark Levin and Judicial Branch Tyranny

You’re wrong, Hugh.

You’re too quick to defend the ruling class. Of course, you’re not alone. Defend the Constitution instead.

It’s the job of the Chief Justice of the United States, that’s his title, to do his job. To uphold his oath to the Constitution. Radical district… https://t.co/sJZ0gF6DcK

— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) March 19, 2025

Must read:

It’s the job of the Chief Justice of the United States, that’s his title, to do his job. To uphold his oath to the Constitution. Radical district court judges intentionally cherry-picked by Democrat and leftwing petitioners (they know the politics of most of these judges as we do) are systematically attacking the constitutional power of the executive branch with nationwide orders, radical political and policy rulings, and picking to pieces the authority granted a president. Silence is exactly the wrong response. Indeed, they’re to be condemned.

Separation of powers is the heart of our system. Look at the Constitution’s structure. Read the Federalist Papers. Read Locke and Montesquieu. And more. You might want to educate yourself about a judiciary run amok in Israel today. Not enough people spoke out when they could. And the elected parts of their government acquiesced. Judicial autocracy there is now said to be a democracy. In fact, you might want to check out George Orwell’s writings while you’re at it.

Roberts failed to curb this a few weeks ago. He could’ve stopped it before it got out of control. He did the opposite. He gave it his rubber stamp. His comment on the elected branches considering impeachment was way out of bounds (impeachment won’t work by the way; eliminating or defunding certain courts would be better). He should still act to end this rather than lecture elected representatives. He can still actually do something about it. Judges aren’t supposed to pontificate about matters not before them. If he’s going to pontificate then do so in a format where he can be questioned or challenged.

That said, it’s our civic duty as citizens, for whom this republic exists, to denounce all forms of tyranny by any branch usurping the Constitution. That’s our primary power. Free speech. To alert our fellow citizens to the threat. To make our views known. Moreover, the elected branches are not only expected to push back but have a duty to do so. It is not the role of we, the people, or our representatives to watch in dumbfounded silence as unelected judges usurp our authority and a foundational principle of our Constitution at the behest of partisan litigants. This is a republic, after all. Our allegiance is not to the ruling class and those who abuse their power. And we don’t need to wait for a higher court to rule to make our revulsion known. We’re not mere observers of this government, we are the reason for this government and participants in it. The litigants and their judges do not stand above us. Nor are they immune from our condemnation, especially given their motives and conduct.

There’s not a single framer or ratifier who would recognize the legitimacy of what these congressionally created lower courts are doing. Not one. And they’d likely be condemning it loudly as constitutionalists are around the country. I’ve no doubt Chief Justice Rehnquist would be acting quite differently than Roberts. The four associate justices led by Sam Alito made clear they were ready to act and were stunned by the Court’s majority, led by Roberts. On what side does any rational person think Rehnquist would’ve fallen? The best Roberts could do was issue essentially a one-sentence order denying the president’s appeal, supporting one of the rogue lower court judges who demanded the president fund foreign adventures, without any explanation to the president or the public — an outrageous snub against the public considering the magnitude of what’s taking place under Roberts’s watch and before our eyes. He doesn’t believe he even owes us an explanation. Perhaps he’ll correct course but damage is being done to the Constitution and the judiciary’s credibility now, which will be harder to fix as time goes on. And if he finally does act, it won’t be due to your thin defense of him, Hugh, but because of those who spoke up and patriotically challenged this growing tyranny.

You’re dead wrong, Hugh. The job of the Chief Justice of the United States is to uphold the Constitution, not defend every judge and employee of the judiciary, any more than it’s the job of the president to defend every employee of the executive branch or Congress to defend any employee of the legislative branch. Wake up, my friend.

John Roberts' legacy as Chief Justice is in ruins.

Chief Justice John Roberts Gets Weird, Makes Statement on Impeachment

For more than two centuries, the question of whether to impeach judges has been left solely to the elected representatives of the American people. John Roberts has no say in the matter, regardless of how much he wishes otherwise. Our Constitution gives John Roberts no power… pic.twitter.com/3mzWlCX1z0

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) March 18, 2025

The Supreme Court press office is still refusing to make John Roberts’ statement about Trump available to the media writ large or the general public.

The deliberate lack of transparency here is extremely troubling. pic.twitter.com/485yQctckE

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) March 18, 2025

PRESIDENT TRUMP RESPONDS TO JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS: IT’S A PRESIDENTIAL JOB TO REMOVE DANGEROUS ILLEGAL ALIENS FROM OUR COUNTRY, THAT’S NOT FOR A LOCAL JUDGE TO BE MAKING THAT DETERMINATION pic.twitter.com/qfSPTomvZR

— TheBlaze (@theblaze) March 18, 2025

John Roberts remained silent when Biden flat-out ignored the Supreme Court's ruling on the Biden student loan bailout. He was silent when the Justice Department acted as an arm of the Democrat Party. Now, he chooses to speak out against the impeachment of a rogue federal judge.

John Roberts is a Leftist. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States is a Leftist.

The Oath and the Bible

...It is wishful thinking for some and angst for others that the Bible-lite oath might not satisfy the standard under Article II. It is time to move on to other more important things to worry about . . . like who will be the next coach for the Chicago Bears.

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) January 20, 2025

Yes, it counts.

President Donald J. Trump

The 60th Presidential Inauguration Ceremony https://t.co/kTB4w2VCdI

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 20, 2025

TRUMP TAKES THE OATH!

Ladies and gentlemen, it's official. pic.twitter.com/bd99voLq1r

— Russell Brand (@rustyrockets) January 20, 2025

John Roberts jumped the gun, starting the oath before Melania, holding the Bibles, and other family members were positioned alongside the president. They had to race to reach him in time.

It's not as if this is the first time Roberts has administered the presidential oath of office.

It doesn't matter. All that matters is that Donald Trump is now the 47th president of the United States.

Trump Sentenced

ALAN DERSHOWITZ:

"He will appeal to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court will take the case. Once the case is taken on the merits, I think it will be reversed."

"I'll never call Donald Trump a convicted felon. He is a convicted innocent man. A convictively framed-up man." pic.twitter.com/7581fIDU00

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) January 10, 2025

I don't trust the Supreme Court to do the right thing.

Shame on Justices Roberts and Barretthttps://t.co/lNjriLTYHE

— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) January 10, 2025

It's a shame that John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett have lost their minds.

President Trump has sacrificed so much for our country. He's been abused like no other president, yet he keeps fighting to restore America's greatness. He keeps fighting for the forgotten men and women of America.

His "convicted felon" status serves as a reminder of what a true patriot he is.

Supreme Court Rules Feds Can Remove Texas Border Barriers

🚨 #BREAKING: The US Supreme Court has ruled on a 5-4 vote that the federal government can REMOVE Texas’s border barriers, such as razor wire

The barriers erected by Texas were actually WORKING, which is why the Biden admin was so hellbent on destroying them.

THIS IS INSANE. pic.twitter.com/lbqhlQt7oC

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) January 22, 2024

Holy shît

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court just ruled that Biden can remove razor wires installed by Texas on the border.

The 3 liberals on the court were joined by Justices Roberts and Barrett.

The Biden administration will likely seize Shelby Park from Texas and remove… pic.twitter.com/BHYuIkTghu

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) January 22, 2024

I hope Greg Abbott ignores the ruling just like Biden is ignoring our laws by permitting a wide open border.

Biden and the Democrats are destroying the country. Uniparty members are destroying the country.

VOTE FOR REGIME CHANGE 2024.

And don't tell me this is a conservative court.

Nancy Pelosi: POTUS Can't Cancel Student Loan Debt

Justice Roberts cited Nancy Pelosi in the majority opinion when she said Biden doesn't have the power to cancel student debt.

Thanks Nancy! pic.twitter.com/w1zYPTm6Ul

— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) June 30, 2023

True.

Dobbs Leak Report

The Supreme Court's report indicates that they cannot isolate the culprit among the over 80 possible suspects for the Dobbs leak. It is an admission that is almost as chilling as the leak itself...

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) January 19, 2023

...What is clear is that any hope for a deterrent on such unethical conduct has been dramatically reduced. Thus far, the culprit succeeded in not just leaking the opinion but evading detection...

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) January 19, 2023

...In this age of rage, this danger will only grow. Someone felt that they had license to leak. Some others may now feel that they have the impunity to do so. https://t.co/2rggctrUQm

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) January 19, 2023

Disgraceful. John Roberts is destroying the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court Temporarily Halts End of Title 42

🚨BREAKING: The Supreme Court just halted the lower court decision to end Title 42. pic.twitter.com/uQhuY4G1eH

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) December 19, 2022

BREAKING: Chief Justice John Roberts puts a temporary hold on the district judge’s order to end Trump-era policy Title 42. pic.twitter.com/yfhDIZEpCA

— The Gateway Pundit (@gatewaypundit) December 19, 2022

Considering 5 MILLION illegal crossings have occurred with Title 42 in place, lifting it would hardly signal the beginning of a crisis.

It began with the installation of Biden as president.