Hillary Did It

Yes, she did. https://t.co/WfedCDTfgL

— Byron York (@ByronYork) May 24, 2022

If Hillary Clinton and her accomplices aren't held accountable and punished for their crimes and abuse of power, there is no justice in the United States.

Hillary Clinton - Dirtiest Politician

Jesse Watters just ENDED Hillary Clinton Crime family after she gets EXPOSED for approving Russia Hoax LIE: “Has there EVER been a dirtier politician than Hillary Clinton?!” pic.twitter.com/e32xkbmGuV

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) May 23, 2022

New York Times - Hillary Clinton and Robby Mook

Wild. The NYT didn’t cover Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager testifying under oath that she gave the go ahead to leak false allegations of Russia collusion about the Trump campaign. https://t.co/cdd9c77mUq

— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) May 21, 2022

Inexcusable.

The New York Times is following its disgraceful history of ignoring and covering up huge stories.

Robby Mook: Hillary Knew

Robby Mook, the Clinton Campaign Manager in 2016 said in court Friday that Hillary Clinton herself approved the idea of giving the Alfa Bank story to a reporter. “We told her we have this and we want to share it with a reporter. She agreed to that.”
@BrookeSingman @davidspunt

— Jake Gibson (@JakeBGibson) May 20, 2022

Mook reviews and reads this Tweet to the jury. It is now evidence in the trial. https://t.co/QTTusBKedU

— Adam Goldman (@adamgoldmanNYT) May 20, 2022

Hillary Clinton approved an effort to leak allegations that Donald Trump was colluding with Russia via Alfa Bank, according to her 2016 presidential campaign manager, Robby Mook, who testified Friday in federal court in Washington, DC.

https://t.co/9gsdezjYWc

— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) May 20, 2022

🚨 🚨🚨BOMBSHELL: Hillary personally approved dissemination of Trump-Russia Hoax to the media, Clinton campaign manager testifies to John Durham pic.twitter.com/37Gs8IHE2A

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) May 20, 2022

What Hillary Clinton, Obama, the entire Democrat Cabal, and the Swamp dwellers did to Donald Trump is the biggest political scandal in American history, bar none.

Bret Stephens Backlash

New York Times readers are happy with new columnist Bret Stephens.

The backlash over his first column, "Climate of Complete Certainty," verifies his point.

He begins with this:

When someone is honestly 55 percent right, that’s very good and there’s no use wrangling. And if someone is 60 percent right, it’s wonderful, it’s great luck, and let him thank God.

But what’s to be said about 75 percent right? Wise people say this is suspicious. Well, and what about 100 percent right? Whoever says he’s 100 percent right is a fanatic, a thug, and the worst kind of rascal.

— An old Jew of Galicia

Stephens discusses Hillary Clinton's failed 2016 presidential campaign and climate change to illustrate the danger of assuming one is right, without question.

Stephens writes:

In the final stretch of last year’s presidential race, Hillary Clinton and her team thought they were, if not 100 percent right, then very close.

Right on the merits. Confident in their methods. Sure of their chances. When Bill Clinton suggested to his wife’s advisers that, considering Brexit, they might be underestimating the strength of the populist tide, the campaign manager, Robby Mook, had a bulletproof answer: The data run counter to your anecdotes.

That detail comes from “Shattered,” Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes’s compulsively readable account of Clinton’s 2016 train wreck. Mook belonged to a new breed of political technologists with little time for retail campaigning and limitless faith in the power of models and algorithms to minimize uncertainty and all but predict the future.

“Mook and his ‘Moneyball’ approach to politics rankled the old order of political operatives and consultants because it made some of their work obsolete,” Allen and Parnes write about the campaign’s final days. “The memo that one Hillary adviser had sent months earlier warning that they should add three or four points to Trump’s poll position was a distant memory.”

There’s a lesson here. We live in a world in which data convey authority. But authority has a way of descending to certitude, and certitude begets hubris.

...Claiming total certainty about the science traduces the spirit of science and creates openings for doubt whenever a climate claim proves wrong. Demanding abrupt and expensive changes in public policy raises fair questions about ideological intentions. Censoriously asserting one’s moral superiority and treating skeptics as imbeciles and deplorables wins few converts.

None of this is to deny climate change or the possible severity of its consequences. But ordinary citizens also have a right to be skeptical of an overweening scientism. They know — as all environmentalists should — that history is littered with the human wreckage of scientific errors married to political power.

I’ve taken the epigraph for this column from the Polish poet Czeslaw Milosz, who knew something about the evils of certitude. Perhaps if there had been less certitude and more second-guessing in Clinton’s campaign, she’d be president. Perhaps if there were less certitude about our climate future, more Americans would be interested in having a reasoned conversation about it.

The reaction from Leftists is one you'd expect if Stephens had advocated the clubbing to death of baby seals.

Their unhinged response to his column confirms his warning regarding having a closed mind and blinding oneself with certitude.

"Whoever says he’s 100 percent right is a fanatic, a thug, and the worst kind of rascal."

True.

State Emails on Weiner Laptop

When will Democrats and Never Trump people quit repeating the same stale talking points and finally admit that Hillary Clinton is too flawed to be president?

What will be the breaking point? When will the Democrats turn their backs on her?

When will they say the many Clinton scandals and Hillary's obstruction and her lies and her destruction of emails under subpoena are too much to ignore? When will they acknowledge that she poses a danger to our country?

And when will they hold Obama accountable for lying about his knowledge of Hillary's private server? He communicated with Hillary via a server that was not secure and he knew it. Obama is involved, too.

From CBS News:

The FBI has found emails related to Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state on the laptop belonging to the estranged husband of Huma Abedin, Anthony Weiner, according to a U.S. official.

These emails, CBS News’ Andres Triay reports, are not duplicates of emails found on Secretary Clinton’s private server. At this point, however, it remains to be seen whether these emails are significant to the FBI’s investigation into Clinton. It is also not known how many relevant emails there are.

In a letter to Congress last Friday, FBI Director James Comey indicated that the agency was taking steps to review newly discovered emails relating to Clinton’s private email server. Those emails came from the laptop of Weiner, a former New York congressman. Abedin reportedly said she had no knowledge of the existence of any of her emails on Weiner’s laptop. On Monday, CBS News reported that the FBI had obtained a warrant for the emails.

We can thank Carlos Danger for engaging in perverted, possibly criminal, behavior. His sick proclivities are responsible for bringing the evidence of Clinton's behavior to light, as well as leading to evidence exposing the recklessness and corruption of Clinton's inner circle.

Burying bad news with worse news: Clinton manager Robby Mook planned to bury emails with Keystone Pipeline https://t.co/HPHammKFeU pic.twitter.com/oSk12ge6qL

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) November 4, 2016

Robby Mook, Clinton Campaign Manager

In Nevada, Clinton’s campaign manager faces his biggest test