Showing posts with label Andrew Breitbart. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Andrew Breitbart. Show all posts

Sunday, March 1, 2026

Andrew Breitbart - February 1, 1969 - March 1, 2012

Andrew Breitbart discusses his own legacy.

"Everything has changed, everything has changed in the last few years. Conservatives used to take it and we're not taking it anymore."

--ANDREW BREITBART

Saturday, March 1, 2025

Andrew Breitbart - February 1, 1969 - March 1, 2012

Andrew Breitbart discusses his own legacy.

"Everything has changed, everything has changed in the last few years. Conservatives used to take it and we're not taking it anymore."

--ANDREW BREITBART

Friday, February 21, 2025

Andrew Breitbart and CPAC

From Breitbart:

Speaking with White House Deputy Chief of Staff James Blair on stage at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center, Boyle gave a shout-out to the late founder of Breitbart News after mentioning some of President Donald Trump’s accomplishments since he reentered office.

“I think I saw somebody say that there are more executive orders we’ve seen President Trump sign than there are prime time viewers on CNN, right? But the level of action is just incredible… It’s rapid-fire, lots of different action out there,” Boyle said.

“I’ll tell you the person that I think would really — and I know a little bit of something about this, because I work for Breitbart — that I think would be absolutely loving this, is the one and only Andrew Breitbart,” he continued. “At CPAC, of course, we got to give Andrew Breitbart a shout-out — because Andrew Breitbart was CPAC,” he added, to an applauding crowd.
"Andrew Breitbart was CPAC."

Friday, March 1, 2024

Andrew Breitbart - February 1, 1969 - March 1, 2012

Andrew Breitbart discusses his own legacy.

"Everything has changed, everything has changed in the last few years. Conservatives used to take it and we're not taking it anymore."

--ANDREW BREITBART

Wednesday, March 1, 2023

Andrew Breitbart - February 1, 1969 - March 1, 2012

Andrew Breitbart discusses his own legacy.

"Everything has changed, everything has changed in the last few years. Conservatives used to take it and we're not taking it anymore."

--ANDREW BREITBART

Tuesday, March 1, 2022

Andrew Breitbart - February 1, 1969 - March 1, 2012

Andrew Breitbart discusses his own legacy.

"Everything has changed, everything has changed in the last few years. Conservatives used to take it and we're not taking it anymore."

--ANDREW BREITBART

Monday, March 1, 2021

Andrew Breitbart - February 1, 1969 - March 1, 2012

Andrew Breitbart discusses his own legacy.

"Everything has changed, everything has changed in the last few years. Conservatives used to take it and we're not taking it anymore."

--ANDREW BREITBART

Monday, November 16, 2020

Election 2020 - What Happened

The 2020 presidential election was rigged.

This is no time to go wobbly.

"Everything has changed, everything has changed in the last few years. Conservatives used to take it, and we're not taking it anymore."

--ANDREW BREITBART

Sunday, February 9, 2020

Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Tucker Carlson and the Outrage Machine

On his show Monday, Tucker Carlson responded to the smear campaign against him led by Media Matters.

He didn't issue an apology. Instead, he called out the Democrat/Leftist mob bent on taking out conservatives at FOX News. He said, "We will never bow to the mob. Ever. No matter what.




Carlson's response reminds me of Andrew Breitbart's 2012 CPAC speech.

Breitbart said, "Everything has changed, everything has changed in the last few years. Conservatives used to take it and we're not taking it anymore."


Saturday, September 29, 2018

Leftists: 'Why Are You So Angry?'

Leftists don't understand the anger some Americans feel.



Their intolerance is stunning. They insist that we agree with them, and if we don't, they set out to destroy us. They think they can break us.

I love this:

"Everything has changed, everything has changed in the last few years. Conservatives used to take it and we're not taking it anymore."

--ANDREW BREITBART

Tuesday, January 9, 2018

Steve Bannon Out at Breitbart

Breitbart cuts ties with Steve Bannon.

From FOX News:

Stephen Bannon has stepped down as executive chairman of the pro-Trump, populist website Breitbart News, less than a week after a dramatic falling out with President Trump.

Breitbart announced the news Tuesday afternoon on its website, saying it would work together with Bannon on “a smooth and orderly transition.”

“I’m proud of what the Breitbart team has accomplished in so short a period of time in building out a world-class news platform,” Bannon said in a statement on the site.

“Steve is a valued part of our legacy, and we will always be grateful for his contributions, and what he has helped us to accomplish,” Breitbart CEO Larry Solov said.

...His departure also means Bannon will lose his radio platform.

"Breitbart News has decided to end its relationship with Stephen K. Bannon, therefore he will no longer host on SiriusXM since our programming agreement is with Breitbart News," SiriusXM said in a statement.
Bannon really screwed up.


Monday, November 6, 2017

Anthony Weiner: Prison



Thank you, Andrew!

Monday, March 6, 2017

Greg Gutfeld: Remembering Andrew Breitbart

Marking the fifth anniversary of Andrew Breitbart's death, Greg Gutfeld wrote a piece explaining and honoring his friend.

I keep Andrew's quotation from his CPAC 2012 speech permanently posted on the sidebar of this blog.

"Everything has changed, everything has changed in the last few years. Conservatives used to take it and we're not taking it anymore."
I loved watching him on Red Eye and enjoyed his other appearances. He was a warrior, but he was fun. I just found him so likable.

It bothers me that many on the Left and the Right have turned the name "Breitbart" into a synonym for racism, hate, intolerance, and overall idiocy. They say it with a sneer. They consider "Breitbart" synonymous with crap. It's offensive. In discussions, whenever someone degrades "Breitbart," I always remind them to think about Andrew Breitbart and note that distinction.

Read Gutfeld's piece on Breitbart.

Excerpts:
Say what you will about how A.B. felt about Trump's politics, but Andrew predicted this new kind of Republican. His most famous quote? “Politics is downstream from culture.” Meaning, to win in politics, you have to win the culture. Trump is the first Republican to exemplify this equation. Born and bred in the restless impatience of modern culture and eschewing the stuffy moralism of conservative ideology and the politically correct paralysis of the left, he fulfilled what Andrew saw coming: a path free from the tricks played upon the right for so long. Sure, Trump was rude, offensive and sloppy — but so was America. And like America, he was tired of the PC BS.

Andrew was Trump before Trump. Wherever Andrew spoke, crowds formed. He could talk for hours on just about anything. He fell in love with the masses who were looking for a new direction. Sound familiar?

There are disagreements over where Andrew might have stood on Trump, but I know he would have relished the implosion of pernicious tribal politics. Andrew was a conservative, but he hated litmus tests and ideas tethered to precious books. He just wanted to expose the lie of leftism. Trump wouldn't have found his footing in such ground if Andrew hadn’t begun sowing that turf a decade before.

Where would Andrew stand on the internal conflicts among Republicans over Trump? Would it matter that The Donald was neither ideological nor predictably conservative? Would Andrew be suspicious of Trump’s autocratic outbursts, impulsiveness and disdain for critics? Or would he embrace Trump not just as a natural ally, but as the first real candidate in a post-ideological world? I don't know, but he'd be enjoying every minute of it.

...Before Andrew, the right settled for being out of step and outraged. We were offended by a changing culture instead of figuring out how to own it, and we took on the demeanor of the picked-upon nerd, screaming "it's not fair" to the liberal media that constantly degraded conservatives.

Andrew changed that. His goal wasn't simply to make conservatism cool (trying to do that, in itself, is not cool), but to expose how uncool the other side was.

...So, what about now … 2017, the era of Trump? I think Andrew would have found him vastly entertaining, while being cognizant of his impulsiveness. He would struggle with Trump the way so many of us have. But, ultimately, he would see Trump as darkly humorous, important and preferable to the Democratic alternative. At least Trump is real, and more vital. At least Trump has finally opened the door to fight back against those who, for decades, reveled in attacking us.

...The beauty of 2016 is that nothing that used to work for the left works anymore. It's done. The name-calling, the smearing — now, our collective response to such attacks, borrowed from Andrew's own arsenal of rebuttals, is, "So?"
Yes.

Thank you, Greg Gutfeld.



I understand why Greg comes to the conclusions he does regarding Andrew's probable view of politics today because Andrew said it himself on February 10, 2012.


ANDREW BREITBART: You want a unity speech? I'll give you a unity speech. I don't care who our candidate is, and I haven't since the beginning of this. I haven't.

Ask not what the candidate can do for you, ask what you can do for the candidate. And that's what the Tea Party is. We are there to confront them on behalf of our candidate.

I will march behind whoever our candidate is because if we don't we lose.

There are two paths, there are two paths. One is America, and the other one is Occupy. One is America, the other one is Occupy. And I don't care, along the way, along the way, along the way - and I'm not a candidate, I'm never going to be a candidate. I'm just a goofball from Los Angeles who wears goofy shoes; promised people I would shave, didn't; promised to take a shower, I got too caught up talking to everybody.

And here I am, kind of a mess, but kind of excited to be here, because over the last three years I've realized that the Republican Party and the Conservative movement is not what ABC and CBS puts on the screen. They try to portray you in the worst possible light.

And when I walk through CPAC, or a I travel the United States to meet people in the Tea Party who care, black, white, gay, and straight, anyone that's willing to stand next to me to fight the progressive Left, I will be in that bunker. And if you're not in that bunker because you're not satisfied with this candidate, more than shame on you. You're on the other side.

Breitbart rallied people to take on the progressive Left. He urged people not to accept the Leftist media calling them racist and degrading them. He demanded the Leftist media be held accountable. He promised to do it and encouraged everyone to do it.

ANDREW BREITBART: We're watching you to play the race card, MSNBC...call everyone who's Caucasian a racist.... No more. 'He's a racist.' That's a dog whistle.... No more.

We're going to go after you. I bought a dog whistle. I bought a dog whistle factory and I'm giving you dog whistles. And we're going to listen to every word that comes out of your mouth, and we're going to hold you to the same standard that you hold us, which is an impossible one. And you're going to have a hell of a time in 2012 because America has finally awakened to your Saul Alinsky bullshit tactics. And we're coming to get you.

"Everything has changed, everything has changed in the last few years. Conservatives used to take it and we're not taking it anymore."


Thank you, thank you, Andrew Breitbart.

Monday, August 8, 2016

Charlie Sykes: False Statement About Breitbart

Time to fact check Charlie Sykes.

Yes, we know that Sykes and his Right Wisconsin minions are on a Never Trump (AKA Always Hillary) mission.

I tuned in to Sykes' radio program this morning to hear his interview with Mike Pence. After, Sykes discussed Paul Ryan's primary race with Paul Nehlen. In the process, he bashed Drudge, Breitbart, Sarah Palin, Ann Coulter, Laura Ingraham, and others.

First, I wholeheartedly support Paul Ryan and will be happy when he wins tomorrow as he undoubtedly will.

Now, back to Sykes and his flat-out false statement about Breitbart.

Sykes was whining about figures in the national conservative media, including Breitbart.

Sykes said that they don't understand Wisconsin, that they "had absolutely zip to do with the Republican revolution in Wisconsin." He said they were "absolutely nowhere during the recall elections." He said they "never lifted a finger for Scott Walker."

That is BS.

Andrew Breitbart most definitely covered the struggle in Wisconsin in 2011. He came to Madison and spoke at rallies and did exposés on the Leftist protesters. Sarah Palin came to Madison in 2011. Certainly, Drudge posted links to stories about the war on Scott Walker.

From a previous post:

Here in Wisconsin, we all remember the insanity of early 2011. Breitbart was here, helping us fight to save our state.

When doctors in Madison were handing out fraudulent medical excuses to teachers and others skipping work to protest Gov. Scott Walker's reforms, Breitbart was there. He had no problem being diagnosed with "Walker pneumonia."

Here's video:




Here's Breitbart at a Tea Party rally in Madison, February 19, 2011:



He was passionate. He was fully committed to the cause. His enthusiasm and tenacity was inspiring. He was funny.

Here's video of Breitbart's remarks while introducing Sarah Palin at a Tea Party rally in Madison, April 16, 2011:




He was not afraid to call out the divisive, pro-union protesters there on the periphery of the gathering as lying, rude, disrespectful people. Breitbart told them to "go to hell." He defended the courageous Sarah Palin for her effectiveness in calling out the "community organizer-in-chief, Barack Obama."

And here's Andrew Breitbart's speech at CPAC, February 11, 2012:




One of my favorite lines: "Everything has changed, everything has changed in the last few years. Conservatives used to take it and we're not taking it anymore."
Bottom line: Sykes is wrong. PANTS ON FIRE wrong. The people he now maligns were a part of the Wisconsin Republican revolution.

Breitbart was here, as were others. They brought national attention to our fight against the Leftists occupying Madison.

Sykes and his Right Wisconsin crew need to be careful. Their credibility is at risk. They are not allowed to rewrite history.

____________

I'll offer specifics of the Sykes interview with Mike Pence later.

I couldn't wait to correct the falsehoods being spread by Sykes on WTMJ. His statements needed to be refuted immediately.

Monday, March 14, 2016

Ben Shapiro Resigns From Breitbart News



From BuzzFeed:

Here’s Shapiro’s full resignation statement:

As a close personal friend and mentee of Andrew Breitbart’s, it saddens me tremendously to announce that as of 9:00 p.m. Pacific Time, I have resigned from Breitbart News as editor-at-large. I met Andrew Breitbart when I was seventeen years old and remained his friend until his tragic death; I signed on with Breitbart News two weeks before Andrew’s death because I believed in his mission.

I am proud of what we accomplished in the years following his death, fighting back against the leftist media and debunking the left’s key narratives. I have many good friends at Breitbart News, including editor-in-chief Alex Marlow and editor-at-large John Nolte, and I admire CEO Larry Solov for his dedication to ensuring a financial future for Andrew’s widow, Susie, and his four children.

Andrew built his life and his career on one mission: fight the bullies. But Andrew’s life mission has been betrayed. Indeed, Breitbart News, under the chairmanship of Steve Bannon, has put a stake through the heart of Andrew’s legacy. In my opinion, Steve Bannon is a bully, and has sold out Andrew’s mission in order to back another bully, Donald Trump; he has shaped the company into Trump’s personal Pravda, to the extent that he abandoned and undercut his own reporter, Breitbart News’ Michelle Fields, in order to protect Trump’s bully campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, who allegedly assaulted Michelle. I spoke with Michelle the night after the incident. She told me her story. That story was backed by audiotape, eyewitness testimony from The Washington Post’s Ben Terris, physical bruises, and video tape.

Both Lewandowski and Trump maligned Michelle in the most repulsive fashion. Meanwhile, Breitbart News not only stood by and did nothing outside of tepidly asking for an apology, they then attempted to abandon Michelle by silencing staff from tweeting or talking about the issue. Finally, in the ultimate indignity, they undermined Michelle completely by running a poorly-evidenced conspiracy theory as their lead story in which Michelle and Terris had somehow misidentified Lewandowski.

This is disgusting. Andrew never would have stood for it. No news outlet would stand for it.

Nobody should.

This truly breaks my heart. But, as I am fond of saying, facts don’t care about your feelings, and the facts are undeniable: Breitbart News has become precisely the reverse of what Andrew would have wanted. Steve Bannon and those who follow his lead should be ashamed of themselves.

Things have gotten really ugly, but this might be the beginning of a much-needed reorganization at Breitbart.

Relations between Bannon and the site’s staff — which were already fraught with tension over the direction and editorial vision for the company — have deteriorated sharply over the episode with the Trump campaign. According to one company source with knowledge of the situation, some editors have discussed telling Breitbart News CEO Larry Solov they will quit unless Bannon is ousted. Solov did not immediately respond to a request for comment Sunday night.

Friday, March 1, 2013

Remembering Andrew Breitbart

It's hard to believe it's been one year since Andrew Breitbart passed away. It doesn't seem possible.

Here in Wisconsin, we all remember the insanity of early 2011. Breitbart was here, helping us fight to save our state.

When doctors in Madison were handing out fraudulent medical excuses to teachers and others skipping work to protest Gov. Scott Walker's reforms, Breitbart was there. He had no problem being diagnosed with "Walker pneumonia."

Here's video:




Here's Breitbart at a Tea Party rally in Madison, February 19, 2011:



He was passionate. He was fully committed to the cause. His enthusiasm and tenacity was inspiring. He was funny.

Here's video of Breitbart's remarks while introducing Sarah Palin at a Tea Party rally in Madison, April 16, 2011:




He was not afraid to call out the divisive, pro-union protesters there on the periphery of the gathering as lying, rude, disrespectful people. Breitbart told them to "go to hell." He defended the courageous Sarah Palin for her effectiveness in calling out the "community organizer-in-chief, Barack Obama."

And here's Andrew Breitbart's speech at CPAC, February 11, 2012:




One of my favorite lines: "Everything has changed, everything has changed in the last few years. Conservatives used to take it and we're not taking it anymore."

_________________

In Memoriam: Arlene Mae Breitbart, 1925-2013

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Obama Born in Kenya

If it's the lead story on Drudge, it's hard to ignore.

The story comes to us from Breitbart.

Andrew Breitbart promised that this presidential election would be different.

In 2008, Obama was elected without being vetted. This time, Breitbart vowed Obama was not going to escape again without a thorough vetting.

From Breitbart's Big Government: The Vetting - Exclusive - Obama's Literary Agent in 1991 Booklet: 'Born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii'

Note from Senior Management:

Andrew Breitbart was never a "Birther," and Breitbart News is a site that has never advocated the narrative of "Birtherism." In fact, Andrew believed, as we do, that President Barack Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on August 4, 1961.

Yet Andrew also believed that the complicit mainstream media had refused to examine President Obama's ideological past, or the carefully crafted persona he and his advisers had constructed for him.

It is for that reason that we launched "The Vetting," an ongoing series in which we explore the ideological background of President Obama (and other presidential candidates)--not to re-litigate 2008, but because ideas and actions have consequences.

It is also in that spirit that we discovered, and now present, the booklet described below--one that includes a marketing pitch for a forthcoming book by a then-young, otherwise unknown former president of the Harvard Law Review.

It is evidence--not of the President's foreign origin, but that Barack Obama's public persona has perhaps been presented differently at different times.


***

Breitbart News has obtained a promotional booklet produced in 1991 by Barack Obama's then-literary agency, Acton & Dystel, which touts Obama as "born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii."

The booklet, which was distributed to "business colleagues" in the publishing industry, includes a brief biography of Obama among the biographies of eighty-nine other authors represented by Acton & Dystel.

It also promotes Obama's anticipated first book, Journeys in Black and White--which Obama abandoned, later publishing Dreams from My Father instead.

Obama’s biography in the booklet is as follows (image and text below):


Barack Obama, the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review, was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii. The son of an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister, he attended Columbia University and worked as a financial journalist and editor for Business International Corporation. He served as project coordinator in Harlem for the New York Public Interest Research Group, and was Executive Director of the Developing Communities Project in Chicago’s South Side. His commitment to social and racial issues will be evident in his first book, Journeys in Black and White.


...Obama has been known frequently to fictionalize aspects of his own life. During his 2008 campaign, for instance, Obama claimed that his dying mother had fought with insurance companies over coverage for her cancer treatments.

That turned out to be untrue, but Obama has repeated the story--which even the Washington Post called "misleading"--in a campaign video for the 2012 election.

The Acton & Dystel biography could also reflect how Obama was seen by his associates, or transitions in his own identity. He is said, for instance, to have cultivated an "international" identity until well into his adulthood, according to Maraniss.

Regardless of the reason for Obama's odd biography, the Acton & Dystel booklet raises new questions as part of ongoing efforts to understand Barack Obama--who, despite four years in office remains a mystery to many Americans, thanks to the mainstream media.

Like Andrew Breitbart, I don't believe Obama was born in Kenya.

However, I do believe that Obama will play with his identity when he sees it as being politically or personally expedient.

Obama appears willing to alter his persona for his own benefit. He'll create of composite of himself. He won't hesitate to mess with the facts.

He will lie and his followers let him get away with it. In fact, they eat it up.

Didn't Obama feel guilty for misrepresenting himself so frequently and with such gusto?

This new case of misrepresentation, like the many others, speak to Obama's character.

He will be as dishonest as he wants to be, and a lot of people don't mind.

I do mind.

During the 2008 campaign, I wrote that Obama seemed to believe his own myth.

I had no idea how freely Obama constructed himself.

Reality be damned.

Friday, March 16, 2012

Sarah Palin: Breitbart is Here

Sarah Palin has written a wonderful tribute to Andrew Breitbart.

She discusses Breitbart's fabulous new site, and then gets into his intention to properly vet Obama this time around.



The piece is a call to arms, figuratively speaking.

Palin writes:

[The media – those watchdogs of the public trust –] refused to vet Barack Obama. With tingles up their legs, they shielded him.

If the media had done their job of vetting him, we wouldn’t have been shocked that within days after Obama’s election, his close political associate Rod Blagojevich was caught trying to sell Obama’s vacant Senate seat.

If the media had done their job of vetting him, we wouldn’t be astonished to see all the billion dollar green energy kickbacks going to his campaign cronies as the nation heads towards bankruptcy.

If the media had done their job of vetting him, we wouldn’t be surprised that Obama brought these same Chicago “pay-to-play” practices to the White House.

This corruption was entirely predictable. But the mainstream media, who work under our Constitutional right of freedom of the press which our sons and daughters fight in war zones today to protect, dropped the ball and failed America by refusing to vet their chosen candidate.

So, as Breitbart declared in his last CPAC speech, we – the everyday patriotic citizens of the United States – will do the vetting the media refused to do.

This is a first step. Ultimately, Breitbart’s goal was to expose what he called the corrupt Democrat Media Complex. He wanted to break it up because he understood how the left uses its dominance of the mainstream media and pop culture to advance its objectives and marginalize its political foes.

Standing up and defending those who are being unfairly targeted and maligned was also the mission. Is it any wonder Breitbart titled his autobiography “Righteous Indignation” when you consider his deep-seated sense of justice and fair play? He was on the side of the little guy and ready to run to the aid of those who needed it. He possessed that old fashioned virtue of courage, compassion, and decency that we once called chivalry. He inspired that in others.

When you’re in the political arena serving for the right reasons and taking flak from all sides, there is nothing more discouraging then when your fellow conservatives sit on their thumbs or worse yet, join in the attacks. Breitbart understood this because he experienced it himself at times, so he was determined to stand by others in need.

He was a genius at new media, but his real gift was that he was fearless at a time when too many people are afraid and are retreating. Courage inspires courage. Fearlessness emboldens others to follow your lead.

...The task may seem daunting, but a whole new generation of conservatives has been inspired. I’ve seen it first hand. When my daughter Bristol saw the video of Breitbart’s speech at a Tea Party rally in Madison, Wisconsin, she was fired up. She turned to me and said, “Breitbart is cool!”

Yes, he is cool. And “Breitbart Is Here.”

Now let the vetting begin.

There is a new generation of conservatives ready to fight the good fight.

Bristol Palin is right. Breitbart is cool.

Being conservative is cool. And we're not going to roll over anymore.

_______________

Watch Andrew Breitbart at the February 19, 2011, Tea Party rally in Madison.



Inspired?

I hope so.

Breitbart said at the rally:

This is why we're here. It's no longer about the mainstream media. We don't need them anymore. Your cameras are going to get uploaded. Your stories are going to get uploaded... We are the modern day peace movement. This is the peace movement. (Pointing toward Leftist protesters) That's where the anarchists are... We're here to stand by this governor, doing what you voted him to do.

We aren't the anarchists.

We aren't the bullies.

We are the adults, working hard and making responsible decisions to provide a better future for ourselves and our children and their children.

We're standing by Governor Walker.

Thugs aren't going to intimidate us. The Democrat Media Complex can't silence us anymore. The New Media are spreading the word. This is what democracy looks like.

I like the way it looks.

I hope we all get out and vote AGAIN to elect Scott Walker, and refuse to allow the Leftist media, Big Labor, the government union minions, and the White House overturn OUR 2010 election.

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Danny Davis, Obama, and Communists

As Andrew Breitbart promised, Obama would be vetted this time around.

"The Vetting" of Obama continues, thanks to Breitbart.

Obama's Favorite Congressman Hangs With Commies


Watch video here.

Wow.

U.S. Congressman Danny K. Davis is a Leftist radical. He's aligned with the Communist Party.

This is video of Obama calling Davis "one of the best congressmen in the country." Obama says, "He shares our values."

NO, HE DOESN'T.

This makes perfect sense.

Obama is a radical. He's an extremist.

He's making war on the Catholic Church, disregarding the First Amendment.

I suppose communists and their admirers aren't all that into the Bill Rights.

War on Women?

No.

War on Freedom?

Yes.