Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Joe Biden's Foot-in-Mouth Disease

Joe Biden will never be president.

We all know that, right?

On a superficial level, I don't think that Americans can get past the failed hair plugs.

On a more substantial level, the guy is not ready for prime time and he never will be. It's all that baggage.

Some of Biden's racial insensitivities:


"You don't know my state. My state was a slave state. My state is a border state. My state is the eighth largest black population in the country. My state is anything from a northeast liberal state."


"You cannot go into a Dunkin Donuts or a 7-Eleven unless you have a slight Indian accent. I'm not joking."

And today's addition, referring to Barack Obama:

"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."

Can you imagine what the reaction would be if a Republican said that?

A Republican would be crucified.

Really. Doesn't it sound like something that Pat Robertson might say?

Why is Biden given a pass on his remarks?

Will The Washington Post go on a front page rampage akin to its George Allen "macaca" campaign to discredit Biden?

Of course not.

The bottom line:

Biden is a disgrace.

The lib media are shameless in their bias.

The Post's
attack on Allen was unconscionable.

Feingold's Crusade

Now I know why Russ Feingold dropped out of the 2008 presidential race.

Why spend all that money, time, and energy on campaigning to be president when you can be commander-in-chief without leaving your senate seat?

Feingold has decided it's time to the end the war, so he's introducing legislation today to achieve that end.

From The Chicago Tribune:


In an intensifying debate on the war in Iraq, Democratic senators began probing Tuesday how Congress could halt President Bush's plan to send more troops to Iraq or even use its powers to halt the war altogether.

Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) introduced legislation that would immediately place a cap on the number of troops in Iraq--now at about 132,000--and remove all combat brigades in the war zone by March 31, 2008.

Perhaps the boldest--and most quixotic--challenge to the president's authority came from Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.), who said he would introduce legislation Wednesday that would end all funding for the deployment of troops within six months after it is implemented, forcing an end to the war.

Even a leading Republican senator expressed doubts about Bush moving forward on Iraq without sharing decision-making with Congress.

...Feingold said the non-binding resolutions are worthwhile attempts to denounce the president's policy but that Congress is obligated to voters to take action that has more teeth.

"Since the president is adamant about pursuing his failed policy in Iraq, Congress has a duty to stand up and prevent him," Feingold said.

Why doesn't Feingold just change his name to Jane Fonda?

Doyle's State of the State 2007

I didn't watch Doyle's State of the State last night.

Instead, I chose to watch paint dry. Literally.

I was waiting to put on the second coat of paint in the kitchen.

It was much more exciting than Doyle's drivel.

Besides, there's something very honest and sincere about paint drying on my kitchen's walls.

Such honesty and sincerity was missing from Doyle's State of the State.

Bradley Tech-Bay View Brawl

Picture this:

An overtime victory by Bradley Tech over the visiting Bay View High School basketball team Tuesday night sent hundreds of fans onto the court, sparking a disturbance that injured four police officers and two students and led to at least 10 arrests, officials said.

A female spectator suffered a seizure at the height of the disturbance and required medical attention at the scene, Milwaukee Public Schools spokeswoman Roseann St. Aubin said.

Dozens of Milwaukee police officers from all parts of the city were dispatched to the school, 700 S. 4th St., about 9:30 p.m. after the end of the game, in which the Tech Trojans defeated the Bay View Redcats, 82-81.

Lt. Alfonso Morales of the Milwaukee Police Department's Criminal Investigation Bureau said four police officers and two female students, one of whom had the seizure, suffered minor injuries.

The disturbance "was the result of fans rushing the court to celebrate and students from Bay View not being too happy about that," Morales said.

"Tech won the game, and then some kids from Bay View jumped a Tech kid," said Myisha Milton, a Bradley Tech ninth-grader.

The Police Department issued an all-city call upon hearing reports of the disturbance, resulting in a widespread police response, Morales said.

"There were 1,100 tickets sold for this game . . . that's a lot of people in one area to contain," Morales said.

The citywide call for police support was issued in response to the report that a student was having a seizure, making emergency medical response difficult in the midst of the large game crowd, said police spokeswoman Anne E. Schwartz.

An all-city call?

Does that seem a bit extreme?

I suppose given the recent history at Bradley Tech it might seem reasonable.

This January, the school has seen instances of violence, police calls, and arrests. Fights have included parents. Yes, kids call their parents and they join in.

Bradley Tech is in a state of meltdown.

But a city-wide call that sends Fifty squads to the school?

Whenever there's a medical emergency in the midst of a large crowd, is there an all-city call?

All those police sent to tend to the unruly high school basketball game crowd were taken off the crime-ridden streets of Milwaukee.

The violent outburst at this Milwaukee Public School was given the priority of...of what?

A terrorist attack?

The fact that these MPS students are utterly out of control is putting all Milwaukee residents, and anyone visiting the city, at risk.

Milwaukee's police force is stretched so thin to begin with. At least that's what the incompetent Mayor Tom Barrett and November retiree Police Chief Nan Hegerty say; yet this fight was deemed to be so explosive that a city-wide call was considered necessary.

Two police suffered broken bones at the brawl.

That's two more cops off the streets for a while.

MPS, violence, crime.

The city is in CRISIS.

What's being done about it?

For one, The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has relegated its account of the event to page B7.

I guess such a major story isn't worthy of front page status in the main section.

If an incident like that doesn't rate such prominence, what would?

As far as a strategy to crack down on the violence in Milwaukee public schools, students can no longer carry cell phones.

Yeah, that'll get things under control.

I think the most frightening thing about this mess is that these violent students will soon be out of school to take their place among Milwaukee's violent residents.

Wonderful. What a bright future is on the horizon for Milwaukee!

It's a crisis.

The city is dying.

__________________

Watch video of the brawl here.

__________________

UPDATE:

MPS has a
solution!

The Milwaukee Public School System says it's planning to severely limit the amount of fans who can attend Bradley Tech and Bay View High School basketball games. The move follows a brawl that broke out after a game between the schools at Bradley Tech High School.

MPS Spokeswoman Roseanne St. Aubin says for the foreseeable future, MPS will only give two tickets to each player on the two school's teams. The players are only allowed to give those tickets to their parents or guardians. That would mean there can only be a maximum of 24 fans in the stands for each team when they play. St. Aubin says the restriction won't affect the opposing team for the schools.

That should help take care of the violence at Bradley Tech and Bay View basketball games.

Of course, you never know about the 24 fans. They could band together and start a disturbance; but it wouldn't take a call for ALL the city's police resources to respond. (If you can't tell, I'm being facetious.)

I do think that more will need to be done than just restricting who gets into the gym for games.

Most likely, there will be a lot of Tech and Bay View students going to the games. They'll just be hanging around OUTSIDE.

The potential for problems still exists because the thugs still exist.


What this policy does is move the problem to a different location. It doesn't solve it.

It's not really a solution at all.

Still a crisis.

Monday, January 29, 2007

Gateway

Would you think that the hard drive on a laptop only three months old would crash?

Me either.

What a piece of crap!

I hadn't done a backup since December so I lost a number of files, documents, photos, etc.

Don't buy Gateway.

Revenge of The Simpsons

Sunday's episode of The Simpsons got a little preachy.

I don't mean preachy in the Rev. Lovejoy sense. I mean it had an anti-war message.

A watershed moment of the Vietnam era was when Walter Cronkite traded in his journalistic objectivity to editorialize against the war, reporting that it was unwinnable. (Cronkite said this after the Tet Offensive. Did you know that was a military victory for the U.S.?)

Supposedly, President Lyndon Johnson said, "If I've lost Walter Cronkite, I've lost the country."

He was right; not necessarily about Cronkite, but Johnson had lost the country. And without the support of the country, defeat was inevitable.

Could President Bush say something similar today, "If I've lost The Simpsons, I've lost the country"?


I think a case could be made for that.

Sunday's Simpsons installment was about revenge, "Revenge is a Dish Best Served Three Times."

After Homer was cut off in traffic, he had a fit of road rage. With Marge beside him in the front seat and the kids in the back, Homer went on a rampage, vowing to get revenge.

The family tried to illustrate the impact that revenge has on the one seeking it. Marge, Lisa, and Bart attempted to reach Homer by telling him stories of revenge and its consequences.

The episode was divided into
three segments, three vignettes as told by Marge, Lisa, and Bart.


Marge: "The Count of Monte Fatso" - in pre-revolutionary France, Homer plots his revenge on Moe after he frames Homer for treason

Lisa: "Revenge of the Geeks" - the geeks develop a glove to inflict punishment on the bullies, but Milhouse has his own enemies list

Bart: "Bartman Begins" - when young Bart Simpson's parents are murdered in Gotham City, he becomes Bartman in an attempt to find the killer


To make sure that viewers didn't miss the message that the episode was a statement on war and particularly Iraq, there was a tip-off as subtle as a slap in the face.

When Homer set out on his mission of revenge, hanging out the car window and trying to hit the offending driver's car with a baseball bat, Marge cautioned, "Revenge never solves anything."

Homer responded, "Then what's America doing in Iraq?"

The three vignettes followed. It sort of had the feeling of one of the Halloween episodes with cast members taking on different roles in unusual settings.

Marge told her story to no avail. Homer was still bent on revenge.

Lisa then gave it a shot.

Her tale included a power mad Milhouse, making the bullies pay for their abuses.

Again, the Iraq parallels were in your face.

No one was safe from the wrath of Milhouse. He showed no mercy.

Milhouse was challenged, "This is my first day at this school. I haven't done anything to you."

He replied, "You will. This is PRE-venge." I took that to be a nod of disapproval to the Bush Doctrine.

After concluding her parable, Lisa charged Homer with being addicted to revenge.


When Homer confused the moral of her story, Lisa clarified, "The lesson is when you take revenge you become just as bad as the person you harm."

Sound like the "blame America" types to you?

Bart wanted his chance to tell a story as well. Homer wasn't interested in hearing what stupid Bart had to say, until Marge indicated to Homer that he needed to be a good father and listen to Bart, too.

The Superhero Bart segment was just more fantasy. I had lost interest by that point.

The episode concluded with Homer and the other driver lying back on the hood of his car, staring up at the stars. Homer said that they had talked things over and discovered that they had a lot in common.

The two briefly argued about how many stars were in the sky. Homer insisted that there were just two. There weren't. It was more heavy-handed preaching. We have to learn to live and let live and accept each other in spite of our differences.

In sum, viewers were treated to a choppy show, connected only by the underlying message -- revenge is senseless. More specifically, U.S. foreign policy and war is senseless.

The finale was a dedication stating that the episode was in honor of the dead from the Star Wars movies, a black screen with scrolling names.

That made me cringe.

I agree that revenge for its own sake is a misguided reaction benefiting no one. That's a nice lesson.


What I didn't like was the political bent. Interesting that the episode just happened to air to coincide with the weekend's anti-war protests, isn't it?

I like The Simpsons best when humor and wit rule, when it's a respite from the nightmarish news of the day.

Please, no partisan preaching.

The episode simplified the realities of our world. Current U.S. military operations aren't rooted in revenge per se. There's a difference between seeking revenge and seeking justice to protect Americans in the long term.

And we've learned that pre-emptive action in the post-9/11 era has become an unfortunate necessity. What's the other option? Do we wait to be hit again? Do we allow extremists to slaughter thousands of innocents with impunity, thereby inviting them to do it again?

Homer flying into a rage over being cut off on the road is not analogous to fighting our self-proclaimed enemies.

For all its inconsistencies and flaws, I do see Sunday's Simpsons episode as significant.

Surely, Homer and the Simpson family carry as much weight in 2007 as Walter Cronkite did in 1968.



Friday, January 26, 2007

Feingold's Hearing, Not Listening

Russ Feingold isn't content to let Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama suck up the media's attention.

Although he's out of the running as a presidential candidate, he doesn't want to step out of the spotlight.

Feingold has made a name for himself by being ahead of the pack when it comes to extremist lib proposals.

First, he called for U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq by December 31, 2006.

Oops! Never mind.

Then, he joined with the emotional John Kerry and set July 1, 2007 as the new deadline for the troops to leave.

That didn't work out either, but Feingold is still plugging away and sucking up to the fringe Left.

The Maverick Man isn't satisfied with the
symbolic, nonbinding resolutions that the Dems and the spineless Hagel and Warner-type alleged Republicans are introducing. Feingold claims to want action.

Actually, Feingold wants a hearing on cutting off funding for the war. He desperately wants to be heard.

I think he's becoming addicted to these hearings. They give him an opportunity to huff and puff before C-SPAN cameras. If he's really lucky, he might get a quick sound bite on the news, saying something outrageous. You can see the thrill he gets from performing.

Feingold will have another chance to shine next week.


He will be chair of a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing to force the issue of cutting funds out from under our troops as a strategy to end the war in Iraq.

Feingold's press release:

On Tuesday, January 30th, U.S. Senator Russ Feingold will chair a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing entitled, “Exercising Congress’s Constitutional Power to End a War.” Earlier this month, Feingold, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on the Constitution, became the first Senator to call on Congress to use its power of the purse to redeploy our troops safely from Iraq so that we can refocus on the global terrorist networks that threaten our national security. Feingold proposed this action after President George Bush announced plans to escalate our military involvement in Iraq despite the objections of members of both parties, military and foreign policy experts, and the American people.

“Congress holds the power of the purse and if the President continues to advance his failed Iraq policy, we have the responsibility to use that power to safely redeploy our troops from Iraq,” Feingold said. “This hearing will help inform my colleagues and the public about Congress’s power to end a war and how that power has been used in the past. I will soon be introducing legislation to use the power of the purse to end what is clearly one of the greatest mistakes in the history of our nation’s foreign policy.”

Witnesses at the hearing will include:
--Louis Fisher, Library of Congress:

--Prof. Walter Dellinger, Duke University School of Law, former Solicitor General of the United States

--Prof. David Barron, Harvard Law School

--Prof. Robert Turner, University of Virginia Law School

Who: U.S. Senator Russ Feingold, Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on the Constitution

What: Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing -- “Exercising Congress’s Constitutional Power to End a War.” Feingold will chair the full committee hearing.

Where: SD - 226

When: Tuesday, January 30th – 10:00 am ET

I have to give Feingold credit for this stunt.

At least he's not afraid to take a stand.

He's not dancing around the issue with silly, nonbinding resolutions that express no confidence for the President.

At least he's got the chutzpah to address Congress' role, and therefore responsibility, in the funding of the war. He's horribly misguided as Dems tend to be, but his grandstanding is over a meaningful approach.

John Kerry lover Harry Reid and the amazing blinking woman Nancy Pelosi, as well as Chuck Hagel and John Warner, are just posturing over nothing.

If they want to manage the course of the war in Iraq, all they have to do is what Feingold wants to do -- cut off the money. If Congress is so against the presence of our troops in Iraq, then they can bring them home by taking away the money to keep them there.


The media keep yapping about Bush's Iraq policy having no support from Dems and little support from Republicans. They repeat that Americans are "war weary." They want out.

So why screw around with symbolic motions?


On January 24 at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee meeting on Iraq, Feingold spelled out his intentions.

This is not a time for legislative nuancing. This is not a time for trying to forge a compromise that everybody can be a part of.

This is a time to stop the needless deaths of American troops in Iraq. This is a time to refocus our country in the fight against those who attacked us on 9/11.

And we have a moral responsibility, as well as a responsibility to the lives of the American people, to start doing it now.

And I believe in good faith that this chairman means it when he says that's what we're going to be doing. And so I'm going to support what we're doing here today.

Next week, I'll be holding, as chairman of the Constitution Subcommittee of the Judiciary Committee, a hearing to make it very clear that we have the constitutional power to use the power of the purse, to remind our colleagues and the public of that power.

And I will introduce legislation that will combine a timeline with the ability to use the power of the purse so that we can finally redeploy these troops.

Feingold's turning into quite a blowhard.

Redeploying the troops, of course, means cutting and running, admitting defeat.

Still, I like what Feingold is doing. There should be a binding resolution, one that's not just a slap at Bush.

Let's see how many legislators are like Feingold. How many are willing to vote to end America's military involvement in Iraq by drying up the money?

I think it's ridiculous that Warner and other Republicans are wasting their time trying to come up with compromise resolutions.


Weakening the President is what our enemies want. They want us to lose our resolve. They want exactly what Feingold is proposing.

Thursday, January 25, 2007

Pledge YOUR Allegiance to Victory in Iraq

Are you disgusted by the pointless, nonbinding resolutions in Congress, serving no other purpose than to undercut President Bush, slapping him with a vote of no confidence?

Do you find their campaign for defeat sickening?


Read more here.


Sign the pledge.

Discount-Mats Sends a Message



Discount-Mats is in a battle to win the hearts and minds of Americans.

Some Americans were upset by the way an employee responded to an e-mail from a
U.S. soldier in Iraq, Sgt. Jason Hess of the Army's 1st Cavalry Division.

Other Americans supported the employee for exercising his right to speak his mind, insulting the soldier.

(These people not only lack common decency, but they're clueless as to what it takes to run a successful business.)

In an attempt to save itself, Discount-Mats has posted a message for you:



Dear Visitor,

Due to the recent actions of a member within our company, we have been experiencing many difficulties. We have been bombarded by emails and phone calls literally within 12 hours of the event occurring, which sent us in a state of complete shock.

Our technical difficulties were experienced due to severe e-mail and phone call overload.

As a company, we would like to say that it is against company policy to treat anyone disrespectfully, and we condemn any such behavior. The member who was responsible for stating their personal opinion in a disrespectful manner is no longer associated and no longer working with Discount-Mats.com

The members within our company strongly disagreed with the views and actions of this member, and once again, his personal opinion does not reflect the opinions of the company.

We, as a company, are sorry for the events that took place and we do not condone un-professional, rude behavior from any members within our company.

We are trying to get our website back up as soon as possible.

If you are a potential or current customer, or if you would like to leave your comments, please contact us via phone or e-mail below:
New E-mail Address: support @ discount-mats.com

Phone Number: 414-736-8394

We are getting a lot of phone calls and we expect many emails, so please don't be surprised if the mailbox is full. Please try again later as we are constantly trying to clear our phone and e-mail boxes.

Do you feel Discount-Mats' pain?

"A complete state of shock" -- Poor Discount-Mats. Poor Faisal Khetani.

The message is very clear about condemning the actions of the rude worker, and more importantly, condemning that individual's views.



The members within our company strongly disagreed with the views and actions of this member, and once again, his personal opinion does not reflect the opinions of the company.

Is this sincere?

I think it's a sincere effort to salvage the business. I think it's an effort to get back to selling mats and move past the incident.

In a way, the message to visitors says that Discount-Mats supports the presence of U.S. troops in Iraq. The worker called for the troops to withdraw and that "does not reflect the opinions of the company."


SGT Hess,
We do not ship to APO addresses, and even if we did, we would NEVER ship to Iraq. If you were sensible, you and your troops would pull out of Iraq.

Bargain Suppliers
Discount-Mats.com

I still think that the business should ship a LOAD of mats to Iraq and be sure to alert the media for maximum coverage of the good deed.

The bottom line: Politics and mats are a dangerous mix.

Sponge-Worthy


Get wet!

Today's Public Service Announcement:


How to rid bacteria from household sponges has been a hot topic.

TV, radio, and print news outlets have all offered the tip that your sponge can be germ-free after a quick zap in the microwave.


Beware the quick fix!


WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- Two minutes in a microwave oven can sterilize most household sponges, U.S. researchers reported on Monday.

A team of engineering researchers at the University of Florida found that two minutes of microwaving on full power killed or inactivated more than 99 percent of bacteria, viruses or parasites, as well as spores, on a kitchen sponge.

"People often put their sponges and scrubbers in the dishwasher, but if they really want to decontaminate them and not just clean them, they should use the microwave," said Gabriel Bitton, a professor of environmental engineering who led the study.

Writing in the Journal of Environmental Health, Bitton and colleagues said they soaked sponges and scrubbing pads in raw wastewater containing fecal bacteria such as E. coli, viruses, protozoan parasites and bacterial spores.

Then they used a common household microwave oven to heat up the sponges. It took four to 10 minutes to kill all the spores but everything else was killed after two, they said.

"The microwave is a very powerful and an inexpensive tool for sterilization," Bitton said.

What a breakthrough!

Something as simple as microwaving sponges can help people avoid illnesses caused by food borne microbes.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that millions become ill from these germs every year, and thousands die.

If microwaving a sponge can cut down on such illness and death, it sounds like a practice that should become routine.

It seems easy enough. Just toss the sponge in the microwave and voilà -- a sterile sponge that would satisfy even Martha Stewart.

However, a disturbing trend has emerged since the sponge microwave method made the rounds starting about two days ago.

Reports of sponge mishaps are coming into newsrooms.


WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- Reports about a study that found microwave ovens can be used to sterilize kitchen sponges sent people hurrying to test the idea this week -- with sometimes disastrous results.

A team at the University of Florida found that two minutes in the microwave at full power could kill a range of bacteria, viruses and parasites on kitchen sponges.

..."Just wanted you to know that your article on microwaving sponges and scrubbers aroused my interest. However, when I put my sponge/scrubber into the microwave, it caught fire, smoked up the house, ruined my microwave, and pissed me off," one correspondent wrote in an e-mail to Reuters.

"First, the sponge is worthless afterwards so you have to throw it out instead of using it. And second your entire house stinks like a burning tire for several hours, even with windows/doors open," complained another.

Aaron Hoover, a press officer at the University of Florida, said several other news organizations received similar complaints, although no one had complained directly to the university.

"We figured, 'wow, we better let people know right away that the sponge should be wet,'" Hoover said in a telephone interview.

Wow, that would be a good idea to fully explain how to properly use the sponge method.

THE SPONGE MUST BE WET.

That's a little detail that many of the microwaved sponge articles that I pulled up on the Internet failed to specify.


The university issued the following advisory: "To guard against the risk of fire, people who wish to sterilize their sponges at home must ensure the sponge is completely wet. Two minutes of microwaving is sufficient for most sterilization. Sponges should also have no metallic content. Last, people should be careful when removing the sponge from the microwave as it will be hot."

In addition to the advisory, I'm surprised the university didn't issue a disclaimer:

"Not responsible for flaming sponges, destroyed microwaves, and noxious odors in homes. Microwave sponges at your own risk."

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

John "The Botcher" Kerry Backs Out


Dems to Kerry: "Thanks, but no thanks."

It's official. The distinguished John Kerry has dropped out of the 2008 presidential race.

He has abandoned his dream.

He's been relegated to the dustbin of history as a presidential wannabe, a loser, like his colleague Teddy Kennedy.

From The Boston Globe:


Kerry, a Massachusetts Democrat, plans to say he will remain in the Senate to recommit himself to efforts to extricate the United States from the war in Iraq. His decision to stay out of the presidential race reflects a realization that he would have had an uphill climb in capturing the Democratic nomination, given the other party heavyweights who are already in the race, according to the officials, who spoke to the Globe on condition of anonymity.

Kerry plans to make his plans known with a speech on the Senate floor this afternoon, and is taping a message to e-mail his supporters to explain his decision.

Kerry, the party's 2004 presidential nominee, has been acting like a 2008 candidate virtually since he lost to President Bush -- traveling the country, spreading money to other Democratic candidates, and keeping in place a campaign infrastructure that was ready for another presidential bid.

But according to Kerry associates, the senator's plans changed dramatically in the fallout of his election-eve ``botched joke" about the education levels of US troops. The harsh reaction to that incident -- from many Democrats as well as Republicans -- displayed to Kerry the extreme skepticism within his own party about whether he should mount another run.

So it's the "botched joke" that came back to bite Kerry.



Yeah, right.

Kerry's trying to paint himself as a victim of a misunderstanding. The poor man was mocked because he screwed up a joke. Now, his dreams are dashed.

What a load!

The reality is Kerry is a loser and the Dems would be crazy to look to him as their presidential savior.





_____________________________

On the Senate floor this afternoon, Harry Reid told John Kerry how he really feels about him.

"So I say to John Kerry: I love you, John Kerry. And I'm so sorry that things didn't work out for our country, but that doesn't take away from the fact that I will always care about you greatly and remember the times we've spent together."

How sweet!

Clearly, Reid was deeply moved by John Kerry's announcement that he would not be seeking the presidency again, at least not in 2008.



"We came close ... certainly close enough to be tempted to try again," the Massachusetts senator said, recalling his defeat.

"There are powerful reasons to want to continue that fight now. But I have concluded this isn't the time for me to mount a presidential campaign."


So there will be no presidential mounting for John Kerry. Tsk, tsk.

Don't fret, Mr. Kerry. Harry Reid loves you!

Here's a pic of Kerry overcome with emotion as he cuts and runs from the 2008 presidential race.


(Note: In spite of how it may look, the pic is not a pick. "But there--but there was no piick!! I--I did not pick!! There was no piick!!")


Yes, just think of all that Kerry's been fighting for since his return from Vietnam. We know, Mr. Kerry, "courageous" Winter Soldier.

Mats, Lies, and UWM

Sergeant Jason Hess believes he deserves an apology after being insulted by an employee of West Allis, WI based Discount-Mats.com.

He's still waiting.

According to Milwaukee's
NBC affiliate, no direct apology has been given to Hess.

The owners of Discount Mats are so worried about the possible backlash from the controversy over the employee's actions. They consider themselves to be in danger; yet the company doesn't bother to personally apologize for the employee's behavior.

It seems like owner Faisal Khetani doesn't really understand the depth of the insult.

The company's owner, 23-year-old Faisal Khetani, fired the employee who sent the e-mail. He told TODAY'S TMJ4 reporter Mick Trevey the e-mail does not represent the views of the company. Ramzan Khetani, the owner's dad, said, "I am ready to apologize you know - on their behalf. Because that is not the right way to talk to anybody."

If the owner's dad is ready to apologize, then he should urge his son to send Sgt. Hess an e-mail doing exactly that.
But the soldier who received the controversial e-mail wrote reporter Trevey Tuesday to say he has not received any apology directly from the company. He indicated, "They should have emailed me for one, my email (address) is posted everywhere so they cannot say we don't have it."

A message left on Faisal Khetani's cell phone Tuesday was not returned.

Frankly, I'm surprised that Khetani didn't already apologize to Hess.

As Ramzan Khetani said, what the employee wrote "is not the right way to talk to anybody."

So isn't it time to try and right the wrongs?

______________________________

Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger notes that the offensive e-mail sent to Sgt. Hess had a UW-Milwaukee address.

He writes that the account used by the individual belonged to a student who hadn't been at UWM since 2004.

The university doesn’t require former students to relinquish an e-mail address once they are not enrolled as students.

It appears to be a former UW-Milwaukee student living at home operating a website as an e-tailer who fired off the attack e-mail using the business name.

Texas Hold ‘Em Blogger suggests that there is no employee that's been fired. Instead, he thinks "Faisal Khetani is the individual who took the cheap shot at the military and is now hiding under his bed like the sniveling little coward he is."

I think that's a reasonable conclusion. Taking Faisal Khetani's age into account, it seems to fit.

Honorary Dem Ahmadinejad Mocks Bush

Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad seems to be feeling as good as Nancy Pelosi these days. He shares in the Dems' giddiness.

The problem is that state of euphoria is based on a weakened President Bush and, subsequently, a weakened America.



TEHRAN, Iran -- The United States is incapable of inflicting "serious damage" on Iran, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Tuesday, as a second U.S. aircraft carrier group steamed toward the Gulf as a warning from Washington for Iran to back down in its attempts to dominate the region.

In an interview with Iranian state television, Ahmadinejad said Washington had not stepped up its campaign against Tehran, despite the standoff with the West over Iran's defiance of U.N. demands to halt uranium enrichment. The U.N. Security Council imposed limited sanctions on Iran last month.

"U.S. rhetoric against Iran has not increased," Ahmadinejad said. "In 2003, they openly threatened to attack Iran. Now they have indirectly made such threats."

He spoke with confidence over Iran's ability to withstand a strike. "The United States is unable to inflict serious damage on Iran," the president said. He also noted, "They (U.S.) are not really in a position to carry out this action (of attacking Iran). I believe there are many wise people in the United States who would not let it happen."

Listen to Ahmadinejad.

What "wise people"?

He's talking about the Dems.


Pelosi and Reid announced last week that they were against taking a tough military stand against Iran. Instead, they called for chit chat with the regime that has repeatedly called for the destruction of Israel, ignored UN resolutions, and defied the international community.

No wonder Ahmadinejad is so cocky.

A defeat in Iraq, something that Dems are firmly committed to assuring, is a victory for madman Ahmadinejad.

He knows that the American people apparently don't have the will to fight.

He sees no obstacles blocking Iran's path to becoming a nuclear power now that the U.S. is being overrun with appeasers.

Is this in the best interest of the nation?

When President Bush addressed a joint session of Congress and the American people on September 20, 2001, just days after the 9/11 attacks, he said:

After all that has just passed -- all the lives taken, and all the possibilities and hopes that died with them -- it is natural to wonder if America's future is one of fear. Some speak of an age of terror. I know there are struggles ahead, and dangers to face. But this country will define our times, not be defined by them. As long as the United States of America is determined and strong, this will not be an age of terror; this will be an age of liberty, here and across the world.

Great harm has been done to us. We have suffered great loss. And in our grief and anger we have found our mission and our moment. Freedom and fear are at war. The advance of human freedom -- the great achievement of our time, and the great hope of every time -- now depends on us. Our nation -- this generation -- will lift a dark threat of violence from our people and our future. We will rally the world to this cause by our efforts, by our courage. We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail.

It is my hope that in the months and years ahead, life will return almost to normal. We'll go back to our lives and routines, and that is good. Even grief recedes with time and grace. But our resolve must not pass.

"Our resolve must not pass."

You can think the surge is worth trying. You can think that it's already doomed.

You can think that we are better off with Saddam Hussein being history. You can think that it would be better if he were still around to terrorize and torture his people, threaten stability in the region, and plot against America.

Whatever your opinions may be, there's no question that the relentless taunting and hacking away at the President's credibility and character is detrimental to the country.

For example, I heard ABC's Martha Raddatz say that Bush is delusional because he's still talking about victory in Iraq.

If Ahmadinejad heard her, I'm sure he was thrilled. Pundit after pundit after the State of the Union wallowed in what they consider to be Bush's certain defeat in Iraq.

They don't seem to get that Bush's defeat is America's defeat.

And the new direction for the country that the Dems want is the same one that Ahmadinejad wants.

Why not just bring out the white flags right now?

"Our resolve must not pass."

Too late.




Tuesday, January 23, 2007

HASTERT OR PELOSI?

I thought this was funny.

I went to the
White House website to get its State of the Union transcript.

I thought I had clicked on the wrong page and was at the 2006 State of the Union speech.

It wasn't the wrong page. It was the 2007 State of the Union. However, the photo posted above the partial transcript was one from the 2006 address.

I took this screen shot because I doubt it will stay up for long.


Click on the image to enlarge.


Is the White House trying to keep Nancy Pelosi out of the spotlight?

Fondly remembering the glory days of Republican control of both houses?

Here is the full transcript from the White House of Bush's speech.

_____________________________

Update:

Hastert is out of the picture on the White House website.



Click on the image to get a better view of Excitable Girl Pelosi.

Jim Webb Responds

Random thoughts on the Dems' response to President Bush's State of the Union address:

I had trouble listening to Jim Webb’s response.

I kept thinking about his creepy novels and his weird altercation with President Bush.

For someone so explosive, I was surprised that Webb’s delivery was so dry.

It was odd the way he spoke in profile. It made him appear shifty. He had trouble looking directly into the camera.

It was awkward the way Webb pulled out the photo of his father. He pointed his dad out with all the smoothness of a clueless Weather Channel personality discussing a storm in the east while pointing at the Rockies.

For all of Webb’s blather, it was without substance.

He said that the Dems will not cooperate with Bush’s strategy for Iraq, but he didn’t say what they would do other than end the war.

Webb never uttered the word “victory.”
____________________________

Here's the transcript.

____________________________

Apparently, Webb played with the facts about the military in his response.

What did he think he was doing? Writing a novel?

Fiction.

The State of the Union

Random (and superficial) observations on President Bush’s speech:

It was odd having the text of the speech in front of me as the President delivered it. Thank you, Drudge.

Was this the President’s State of the Union address or was this yet another event to honor the historic Madame – Nancy Pelosi? The cheers for her were decidedly louder than those that greeted the President.

For every one time Dick Cheney blinked, Pelosi batted her eyes at least twenty times. Was something in her eyes, dust or something irritating? Was it a BOTOX tick? And what was with all the licking of her lips? Get the woman some Carmex.

Charlie Rangel looked like a Cheshire cat.

Hillary Clinton was seated directly behind Barack Obama – a perfect camera shot. Hillary looked ticked off.

I’m not sure if Ted Kennedy was reading the speech or if he was dozing. He looked bloated and hung over.

I would say the Dems were boisterous. Pelosi kept popping out of her chair.

The Dems DO NOT want medical liability reform.

If I have trouble falling asleep tonight, I’m going to watch the tape of the speech and count how many times Pelosi blinked.

I saw John McCain wink at least three times. One wonders how many more times he did it when the camera didn’t catch it.

Pelosi was definitely quicker out of her chair for standing ovations than Cheney.

Was Pelosi chewing gum or was her Polident giving out?

Although they stood and applauded, I would say that Bush’s proposal to reduce oil consumption was met with a tepid response.

The Dems intend to block Bush’s judicial nominations.

Pelosi hesitated to stand when Bush said "that to win the war on terror we must take the fight to the enemy." Cheney beat her.

One of the most chilling passages of Bush’s speech:



Our success in this war is often measured by the things that did not happen. We cannot know the full extent of the attacks that we and our allies have prevented – but here is some of what we do know: We stopped an al Qaeda plot to fly a hijacked airplane into the tallest building on the West Coast. We broke up a Southeast Asian terrorist cell grooming operatives for attacks inside the United States. We uncovered an al Qaeda cell developing anthrax to be used in attacks against America. And just last August, British authorities uncovered a plot to blow up passenger planes bound for America over the Atlantic Ocean. For each life saved, we owe a debt of gratitude to the brave public servants who devote their lives to finding the terrorists and stopping them.

Barack Obama was propping his head up with his middle finger. (Same to you, Obama.)

If Jack Warner didn’t tilt his head, I would have thought he was a propped up corpse.

A great and telling passage:



Every one of us wishes that this war were over and won. Yet it would not be like us to leave our promises unkept, our friends abandoned, and our own security at risk. Ladies and gentlemen: On this day, at this hour, it is still within our power to shape the outcome of this battle. So let us find our resolve, and turn events toward victory.

Republicans stood and applauded for success in Iraq. Dems DID NOT.

In other words, the Dems have lost their resolve for victory, if they ever had it in the first place.

There was no applause from Pelosi when Bush spoke of increased troop levels in Iraq.

I liked this:



My fellow citizens, our military commanders and I have carefully weighed the options. We discussed every possible approach. In the end, I chose this course of action because it provides the best chance of success. Many in this chamber understand that America must not fail in Iraq – because you understand that the consequences of failure would be grievous and far reaching.


"Many" understand, NOT all. That would be the Dems.

Thank God I didn’t see Joe Biden’s hair plugs on high definition TV.


The Dems had to applaud this because ended the point with a "support the troops line."



This is where matters stand tonight, in the here and now. I have spoken with many of you in person. I respect you and the arguments you have made. We went into this largely united – in our assumptions, and in our convictions. And whatever you voted for, you did not vote for failure. Our country is pursuing a new strategy in Iraq – and I ask you to give it a chance to work. And I ask you to support our troops in the field – and those on their way.

Bush has done more to combat AIDS and malaria and poverty in Africa than Bill Clinton ever did.

NBA player Dikembe Mutombo sat next to the first lady. When he stood after being introduced by the President, he positively dwarfed Mrs. Bush and Mrs. Cheney. He's HUGE!

This was touching:



Three weeks ago, Wesley Autrey was waiting at a Harlem subway station with his two little girls, when he saw a man fall into the path of a train. With seconds to act, Wesley jumped onto the tracks ... pulled the man into a space between the rails ... and held him as the train passed right above their heads. He insists he’s not a hero. Wesley says: “We got guys and girls overseas dying for us to have our freedoms. We got to show each other some love.” There is something wonderful about a country that produces a brave and humble man like Wesley Autrey.

This must have made the troop-bashing John Kerry feel like an ass:


Tommy Rieman was a teenager pumping gas in Independence, Kentucky, when he enlisted in the United States Army. In December 2003, he was on a reconnaissance mission in Iraq when his team came under heavy enemy fire. From his Humvee, Sergeant Rieman returned fire – and used his body as a shield to protect his gunner. He was shot in the chest and arm, and received shrapnel wounds to his legs – yet he refused medical attention, and stayed in the fight. He helped to repel a second attack, firing grenades at the enemy’s position. For his exceptional courage, Sergeant Rieman was awarded the Silver Star. And like so many other Americans who have volunteered to defend us, he has earned the respect and gratitude of our whole country.

I liked the way President Bush ended the speech:


[T]he State of our Union is strong ... our cause in the world is right ... and tonight that cause goes on.

As the speech progressed, Bush gained strength. At the beginning, he seemed a bit tired and worn; but he was energized as he went along.

It wasn’t Bush at his most eloquent, but in a way, it was Bush at his most defiant.

Whatever the polls or politicians say, he’s the president.

Faisal Khetani Makes Amends

Update on the discount-mats.com controversy:

An Internet company based in West Allis is responding to an inflammatory email it sent to a US soldier.

...The web site belongs to Faisal Khetani, who lives in West Allis. He says he fired the employee who sent the email.

"Whatever person said was not fair. (That person) should never have said that," said Ramzan Khetani, Faisal's father.

Ramzan and his wife say that they support the troops. Khetani lives with his parents. Their address is listed as the company's address, and they've been receiving a flood of voice messages and e-mails. Some have included nasty language and threats.

"You terrorist-loving jihad (expletive), this is America, you (expletive)! You get the (expletive) out of this country," were the words on one voice-mail left about the e-mail.

What an idiot!

This voice-mailer is acting as disgracefully as the discount-mats employee did.

I'm glad that Khetani fired the guy. Had he done that immediately, he may have been spared some of the outrage being spewed from "overzealous" supporters of the troops.

Because he didn't axe him right away, it appeared that Khetani was covering for the worker. That certainly doesn't excuse any of the out of control expressions of anger at the business owner; but Khetani's hesitancy to get rid of the employee didn't help calm things.

While I don't doubt that there are hateful people capable of leaving such an offensive voice-mail, I don't rule out the possibility that it was a set-up.

There's no way of knowing whether or not that voice-mail was a real message. It could have been left by an anti-military, anti-war type looking to divert attention from the worker's "I don't support the troops" attitude.

Who knows?

I don't think Khetani should play the victim, even though he has been hurt by the actions of his employee. Surely, he's been the undeserving target of some very hateful stuff. Still, it's best to let that go.

Khetani did the right thing by firing the guy.

Now he needs to send those mats to our troops in Iraq.

Jim Webb's Rebuttal

Newly-elected Senator Jim Webb has been chosen by the Dems to give the Democratic response to President Bush's State of the Union address tonight.

Surprised?

I'm not.


From
The Washington Times:

On the Virginia campaign trail last fall, someone close to Senate candidate James H. Webb Jr. suggested that the Democrat wants to be president.

The Virginian went on to unseat Sen. George Allen, a Republican, have a confrontation with President Bush in the White House over the Iraq war and be chosen by his party to deliver a rebuttal to Mr. Bush's State of the Union address tonight.

If Mr. Webb, 60, does have presidential ambitions, they are far from public knowledge. Still, the decorated Vietnam veteran has emerged as a leading voice on the Iraq war, especially since his own son is a lance corporal stationed in Ramadi.

The senator declined to speak about Lance Cpl. Jimmy Webb's service, but said his response will have an emphasis on Iraq.

"My speech will highlight areas where Democrats in Congress have different priorities," Mr. Webb said yesterday.

"I will be speaking for the Democratic Party ... but I do not intend to deliver a particularly partisan speech," he said. "That part of the campaign is over. Now is the time for governing."

Not partisan???

Isn't the point of the Dem response to be partisan, to give the party not occupying the executive branch a voice?

"I do not intend to deliver a particularly partisan speech. "


How lame!

No doubt, the main reason the Dems picked Webb to deliver the response is because he has what Maureen Dowd called "absolute moral authority." She was referring to Cindy Sheehan when she used the phrase.

Supposedly, because Sheehan's son died serving in Iraq, she spoke the truth and was not to be questioned or doubted.

Similarly, the Dems probably think Webb should command the same sort of authority because his son is a Marine serving in Iraq.

Typical nonsensical, touchy, feely Dem stuff.

It'll be interesting to see if Webb evokes his Marine son during his address. The guy refused to say even a few words about him to the President, insisting it was too personal. Remember?

Webb was so mad that he wanted to slug the President.

Do you think he'll be as tight-lipped about his son on national TV as he was privately with President Bush?


If he does use his son in his remarks, he'll certainly come off pretty hypocritical.

These rebuttals are always so boring.

If Webb wants to get the attention of Americans watching at home, he really should toss out the partisan politics and read from one of his novels.

Samples of Webb's writing can be found
here.

Yikes!

Honorary Dem Ayman al-Zawahri

Once again, the talk of terrorists is basically indistinguishable from the Dems.

Wouldn't you think that would make them squirm? Just a little?


CAIRO, Egypt -- Al-Qaida's deputy leader mocked President Bush's plan to send 21,000 more troops to Iraq, challenging him to send "the entire army," according to a new al-Qaida videotape released Monday by a U.S. group that tracks terror messages.

Excerpts from the video were distributed by the Washington-based SITE Institute, which said it had intercepted the footage of Ayman al-Zawahri. The tape had not yet been posted on Islamic militant Web sites, where his messages are usually placed.

Al-Zawahri said the U.S. strategy for Iraq, outlined by Bush in a Jan. 9 speech, was doomed to fail.

"I ask him, why send 20,000 (troops) only — why not send 50 or 100 thousand? Aren't you aware that the dogs of Iraq are pining for your troops' dead bodies?" said al-Zawahri in the footage released by SITE, an independent group that researches and analyzes terror-related intelligence.

"So send your entire army to be annihilated at the hands of the mujahideen (holy warriors) to free the world from your evil," he said, "because Iraq, land of the Caliphate and Jihad, is able to bury ten armies like yours, with Allah's help and power."

...Al-Zawahri also contended that the al-Qaida and Taliban were regaining control in Afghanistan, denying claims that his terror group no longer has a safe haven there.

"Al-Qaida and the Taliban under the command of the commander of the faithful Mulla Muhammad Omar are the ones who have deprived America of safe haven in Afghanistan."

Al-Zawahri repeated a call he makes often in his messages, for Muslims to turn against secular and nationalist leaders and fight for Islam.

He said Muslims should try to free Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman, an Egyptian militant cleric imprisoned in the United States after being convicted in a plot to attack New York landmarks. He also warned that "Americans must expect to pay the price for everything they have done to" detainees held at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Except for the parts about urging Muslims to reject secular leaders and fight for Islam, al-Zawahri sounds like Ted Kennedy or Dick Durbin or Joe Biden or Russ Feingold.

I don't want to leave out that other honorary Dem, Chuck Hagel. He shares al-Zawahri's belief that the U.S. is sure to be defeated in Iraq. Hagel's against the surge.

With senators like these, who needs enemies?

March for Life



January 22, 1973 was a dark day in America's history.

Thirty-four years ago, the Supreme Court handed down a death sentence to 45 million people when it handed down its decision on Roe v. Wade.

Think about it. Many of those babies, had their mothers allowed them to live, would have babies of their own.

From
The Washington Post:

Tens of thousands of abortion opponents marched through melting snow on the Mall yesterday and vowed to work harder -- since Democrats have taken control of the Capitol -- to overturn the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion in 1973.

TENS OF THOUSANDS.

Tens of thousands march on Washington to protest abortion and promote the sanctity of life and the story is page 10 news!

Demonstrators' hopes were buoyed a year ago at the annual March for Life by two new appointments to the Supreme Court. Now, with Democrats in power in both houses of Congress, abortion foes find themselves without allies in some key positions for the first time in more than a decade.

Yes, the lib Post manages to find a silver lining. The Dems control both houses of Congress. YIPPEE!
"Pro-lifers aren't going to pack up and go home because of the 2006 elections," said Karen Cross, political director of the National Right to Life Committee, at a news conference before the march. "Indeed, we will redouble our efforts and continue working until every unborn child is protected."

Democratic leaders have said they prefer what they consider a less combative approach in preparing legislation on the abortion issue. Several bills are circulating that would change the focus of the abortion debate to pregnancy prevention, through such measures as improved access to contraception.

Democrats say their goal is to find a political compromise, an approach echoed yesterday by some abortion rights advocates.

There really is no compromise when it comes to protecting life.

Sure, steps toward a Culture of Life may be small. Any progress is a step in the right direction.

But this talk by the Dems that they want to find common ground is going to be pretty difficult to do.

A gaping chasm separates partial birth abortion supporters and pro-lifers. Compromise is impossible.

You're for protecting the unborn or you aren't. You respect life in its earliest stages or you consider it expendable.

No common ground.

..."The pro-abortionists say you legally can kill an unborn child for any reason. We say the child should live. Where is the middle ground?" said Wanda Franz, president of the National Right to Life Committee.

Exactly.
Teenagers made up the majority of demonstrators yesterday who poured out of buses from across the country, wearing matching colored scarves or carrying posters with statements such as "Face It Abortion Kills."

"It's amazing!" said Annie Forsthoefel, 17, after an overnight trip with a church youth group from Cincinnati. She and her friends wore matching fleece headbands that said "PRO-LIFE." She said she had wanted to come to the march for the last three years. "How can you not love a baby? It seems unnatural," she said.

The young people joined older abortion opponents, some holding rosaries or draped in blankets depicting the Virgin Mary.

The age of the crowd has to scare the Dems. These young, energized pro-lifers will be voting for decades -- against the Dems' Culture of Death.
...The crowd on the Mall cheered when President Bush spoke to the protesters through a loudspeaker from Camp David, thanking those gathered for their help "to build a culture of life." Bush reminded demonstrators about progress his administration has made in the antiabortion movement, including supporting parental notification laws, funding crisis pregnancy centers and signing into law a ban on partial-birth abortions that the Supreme Court is expected to rule on this year.

NEWSFLASH:

Some Americans willing to cheer Bush can still be found!!!

...As the sun set in front of the Supreme Court at the end of the march, a group of women took to the microphone, one after another, holding black signs that said: "I regret my abortion."

Cindy Rose, 49, of Saginaw, Mich., told the lingering demonstrators about abortions she had in 1979 and 1981.

Rose said the guilt over her abortions killed her relationships and pushed her to alcohol and drugs. "One night I asked God to please forgive me," she said. "Abortion is a lie and not a solution."

As the women spoke, some in English and some in Spanish, their words were interrupted by about 100 abortion rights advocates linking arms and holding signs saying: "Trust women."

I agree.

"Trust women" to be responsible.

Trust them to love their children as gifts from God.

The New York Times'
coverage of the rally was scant, ten brief paragraphs.

This is the first anti-abortion march here since the Democrats took control of Congress. The change is “challenging us to fight harder,” said Natalie Campbell, 18, who was at the rally with her father and their church group from Kokomo, Ind.

Joe Konopa, 19, who traveled here with more than 60 people from three churches in the Kokomo area, said, “They are picking up on the fact that more and more Americans, especially the young, are against abortion.”

Oooh. Scary.

Young people from churches.

Naturally, The Times doesn't emphasize the enormous numbers. Instead, the article ends with this downer from one of the marchers:

Gail Babalonis of Hooversville, Pa., said which party was in control did not matter.

“The last eight years have been pro-life, and the only thing they got accomplished is the ban on partial birth abortions,” Ms. Babalonis said.

Translation: Why bother voting for Republicans? They won't deliver. Vote for Dems!

The Times seems incapable of writing hard news. It's always campaigning and pushing its lib propaganda.

The lib media can report or not report whatever they want. They can spin, but it doesn't change the reality.

The fact remains that tens of thousands marched against abortion and in support of life.

discount-mats.jerk

Wisconsin is at the center of what The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel calls an “international incident.”

That’s being a little dramatic; but the grossly inappropriate e-mail from the discount-mats.com employee to a U.S. service member is garnering a lot of attention.

What’s a liberal rag like The JS to do when faced with a story that is clearly an affront to the American military?

It twists the story, shifting the focus from the disgusting actions of the employee to an admonishment of supporters of the military.

It’s akin to the post-9/11 reaction of the “blame America first” crowd.

The concern becomes anti-Muslim sentiment rather than anti-American, anti-military sentiment.

Annysa Johnson writes:


What began as a brief e-mail exchange between a U.S. soldier in Iraq and a Wisconsin-based online retailer has erupted into an international incident that has pitted military supporters against free speech advocates and threatens to shut down the local company.

Bargain Suppliers of West Allis said its discount-mats.com Web site had to be taken down Monday to address the thousands of e-mails it's received since news of the exchange - in which an employee voiced opposition to the war in Iraq - began circulating on the Internet last week.

Vice president Sajid Nasir said the employee is being "held accountable." But he said the incendiary and threatening nature of some of the e-mails - and voicemails left at the West Allis home that co-owner Faisal Khetani shares with his parents - have shaken the family.

"It's really getting out of control," said Nasir, who described the messages as "angry and vulgar."


Here’s another case that exhibits the power of the Internet. Amazing, when you think about it.

My opinion on the free speech issue is that the anti-military, anti-Iraq war Bargain Suppliers employee had the right to decide to get political when a potential customer wanted to do business. It was incredibly stupid, but he has the right to be incredibly stupid.

As I said before, free speech is not a one way street. It’s fair for consumers to voice their opinions on the employee’s actions.

However, it’s not necessary nor is it right for those expressions to be in any way threatening or vulgar. Such ugliness only compounds the original ugliness.

I can understand that co-owner Faisal Khetani and his family are troubled by the messages they’ve been getting. Threats are completely inappropriate. No question about it.

Perhaps it would be wise for Khetani to release a statement strongly condemning the employee. That might defuse the anger of the angry e-mailers.

…The controversy exploded last week when a soldier, identifying himself as Sgt. Jason Hess of the Army's 1st Cavalry Division, sent an e-mail to discount-mats.com asking if it ships to military addresses.

Someone on the other end answered no, but went on to add that "even if we did, we would NEVER ship to Iraq. If you were sensible, you and your troops would pull out of Iraq."

A handful of Hess' friends got wind of the exchange, and soon it was ricocheting around the Internet - first on the Web site snopes.com, then on conservative and military forums and blogs - and has since made its way to talk radio.

Military supporters were outraged, calling it disrespectful and urging one another to flood the company with e-mails and calls.
Several posted Khetani's name, telephone number and address, which is also the business address, though Nasir insists it's for mailing purposes only.

Many of the messages invoked anti-Middle Eastern or anti-Muslim sentiment. (Khetani is Muslim, Nasir said.) Others vowed to shut the company down, and a few suggested they might make a personal visit.


Notice that the story is becoming about conservatives. They’re depicted as violent, hate-filled racists. It’s no longer about the disrespectful manner in which an employee treated a customer, a man serving in the U.S. military.

"I think it's disgraceful," said Sgt. Maj. Dennis Webster, executive director of the First Cavalry Association in Copperas Cove, Texas, who learned of the e-mail exchange from a reporter.

"He's certainly entitled to his opinion. That's what soldiers defend," Webster said. "But there's a matter of respect. A young soldier isn't making those decisions. He's following orders."

Eduardo Briones, a Milwaukee native and retired Army sergeant who lives in Colorado Springs, Colo., said: "All he needed to say was no."

"I personally think we screwed up in the war, but that's not the fault of the soldiers. That's the fault of the politicians," he said.


I’m surprised it took this long into the article for the reporter to get in a swipe at Bush.

…"This is a matter of free speech," said Julie Enslow, an organizer with Peace Action Wisconsin in Milwaukee. "It is totally irresponsible for radio stations and bloggers to attack a person for his personal political views."

Oh really? And is it totally irresponsible for Peace Action Wisconsin and Left-wing bloggers to level personal attacks at Bush or Cheney and their supporters?

If Enslow is like many other libs, conservative opinion is not tolerated. Conservatives' viewpoints aren't considered valid. Their opinions constitute hate speech.

When libs launch personal attacks, they're just being fair and honest.

Go figure.


Othman Atta, president of the Islamic Society of Milwaukee, said he would fault the worker for his lack of tact but defended his right to speak his mind.

"If you look at the polls, his opinion is reflected by a majority of Americans now," Atta said. "In the United States, everyone one is free to speak their opinion."

Atta appeared concerned that the controversy might fuel anti-Muslim and anti-Middle Eastern sentiment.

"Some people will look for any excuse to target people from the Middle East," he said.


What a load!

First, discount-mats is going to go out of business if its employees “freely” insult customers. The worker displayed an utter lack of self-control. The business e-mail was not the time to be making political statements.

Second, what polls say is irrelevant. It makes no difference what a majority of Americans think. This was about a business transaction. The worker was completely out of line.

Atta’s remark that people will take any opportunity to target people from the Middle East is pure BS.

THE WORKER DISSED THE SERGEANT.

Would it be fair for me to say this in reaction to the employee's wrongdoing?



“Some Muslims will look for any excuse to target people serving in Iraq.”

I don’t think so.

West Allis police said Monday that they were aware of the controversy.

"We're monitoring the situation, in case somebody decides to retaliate," Capt. Tom Kukowski said.

"But we're hoping people use good judgment."


I hope so, too.

Peaceful protest is best. Take a cue from Jesse Jackson and boycott the business until a sincere apology is issued and it sends a few truckloads of mats to our troops in Iraq.

It’s funny that Kukowski is saying he hopes people use good judgment. It was the worker’s horrible judgment that started this all in the first place.



Monday, January 22, 2007

Sundance Presents: "Zoo" --- Not that there's anything wrong with that!



Robert Redford's Sundance Film Festival is oozing with beauty and elegance.

One film that has opened minds is Zoo. It's about what director Robinson Devor calls the "last taboo."


I don't know about that. I don't think we've bottomed out yet when it comes to taboos.

Anyway, Kenneth Turan of The Los Angeles Times is one critic to fall under the spell of Devor's bestiality movie. He calls it poetic.


PARK CITY, Utah -- Zoo" is a documentary about what director Robinson Devor accurately characterizes as "the last taboo, on the boundary of something comprehensible." But remarkably, an elegant, eerily lyrical film has resulted.

"Zoo," premiering before a rapt audience Saturday night at Sundance, manages to be a poetic film about a forbidden subject, a perfect marriage between a cool and contemplative director (the little-seen "Police Beat") and potentially incendiary subject matter: sex between men and animals. Not graphic in the least, this strange and strangely beautiful film combines audio interviews (two of the three men involved did not want to appear on camera) with elegiac visual re-creations intended to conjure up the mood and spirit of situations. The director himself puts it best: "I aestheticized the sleaze right out of it."

Devor and his writing partner, Charles Mudede, live in Seattle and were stunned, as were many in the state, by a story that broke in 2005 about a local man who died after having sex with an Arabian stallion. Though bestiality is not illegal in Washington, the subsequent revelation of the existence of an Internet-based zoophile community (the men refer to themselves as "zoos," hence the title) was a shock.

Though there was the inevitable tabloid fuss, what Devor called "the prurient spectacle," the filmmaker was also "shocked that nobody did an in-depth look at this, that there was no investigative reporting rounding the story out with the psychology involved. I thought, 'This is an opportunity.' "

Though "Zoo" is intent on allowing these men to be heard, Devor's intention was not polemical. "I'm not in there wrestling with the legal or animal cruelty issues," he said. Rather, he envisioned a film like his others: "I count on the natural world pulling my films through. I thought the marriage of this completely strange mind-set and the beauty of the natural world could be something interesting."

In introducing "Zoo" at Sundance, Devor called it "a difficult film and a difficult film to make."

He added: "A lot of people looked at me as if I was an exploitative person, dredging up something for profit, and that bothered me. I was certainly asked many times, often with a wrinkled brow, 'Why are you making this film?' It was something I did resent; I thought artists had the opportunity to explore anything."

..."It happens," the filmmaker said, "so it's part of who we are."

I think Devor is half right.

It's part of who SOME of us are. It may be part of the glitterati milling around at Sundance, but it's not part of who I am.

So this is art -- sex with a horse.

Turan was so taken with Zoo that he agrees Devor "aestheticized the sleaze right out of it."

Now really.

Is that possible?

Is it possible to make a "beautiful" film about bestiality?

How can something so morally perverted be poetic?

I'm not surprised that Devor made his documentary/horse sex movie.

As an "artist," he has the right to express himself. I strongly believe in his right to create "Zoo."

However, expression isn't a one-way street. Others have the right to comment on the depravity of his expression and viewers finding the depiction of horse sex as beautiful.

Of course, I haven't seen "Zoo." I don't rub elbows with the sophisticated artistic elite.

I'm in no position to review the film. But I can say that bestiality isn't elegant or eerily lyrical.

It's abusive and deviant.

Oh, and dangerous. Having sex with a horse can get you killed.

Remove the sleaze?

Impossible.

__________________________
Read the 2005 story that moved Devor to poetically document the tale of a man and the sexual allure of a horse.

Another Wisconsin Dolt

Update below--

Wisconsin has really been on a bad streak lately.

You don't have to hold elected office, (Yes, I'm thinking about Steve Kagen) to be noted as a Dairy State doofus.

Ms. Underestimated and Euphoric Reality point out that a retailer in West Allis injected politics into a business inquiry from a sergeant in the 1st Cavalry Division.

From: SGT Jason Hess
Sent: Tue Jan 16 3:25

Do you ship to APO address? I’m in the 1st Cavalry Division stationed in Iraq and we are trying to order some mats but we are looking for who ships to APO first.

*******************************

From: contact@discount-mats.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: Feedback: from discount-mats.com

SGT Hess,
We do not ship to APO addresses, and even if we did, we would NEVER ship to Iraq. If you were sensible, you and your troops would pull out of Iraq.

Bargain Suppliers
Discount-Mats.com

___________________________

I think Discount-Mats has a major PR problem, in addition to a website problem.
Discount-Mats.com is Experiencing Technical Difficulties...
If you are inquiring about your order, please contact us via phone or email.
Thank you for your understanding & patience.website problem.


__________________________


Snopes has more.

__________________________

UPDATE

The story is true. Read more.


An Internet company based in West Allis is confirming that it sent an inflammatory email to US soldier.

...A Vice President with Bargain Suppliers, the website's parent company, confirms the email was sent. He says the employee who sent it is being held accountable and will be dealt with.

In addition, the spokesperson says the address and phone number that are now being circulated around the world are someone's home in West Allis. He says they've been bombarded with phone calls and as you can imagine they're getting plenty of complaints.

Bears v. Colts

Super Bowl XLI is guaranteed to be historic because of race.

When I saw the Saints fall apart and it became clear that the Bears and Coach Lovie Smith were going to the Super Bowl, I didn't think about Smith's skin color.

Congratulations to him. It's a tremendous accomplishment to coach your team to the Super Bowl. Smith seems like a nice guy and he's done a great job with the Bears.

But there's the rub -- the BEARS.


As a Packers fan, I can't be happy about the Bears being in the Super Bowl.

It's not that I never cheer for the Bears. Just last weekend, I was thrilled that the Bears kept the Seahawks out of the NFC championship game -- anything to keep Mike Holmgren away from winning another Lombardi Trophy.

It's small of me, but I blame him for the 1998 Packers loss in Super Bowl XXXII.


Even though I still hold a grudge against him for his poor coaching in that game, I felt sorry for Holmgren after Seattle's loss to the Bears. He seemed so dejected. I felt guilty for wanting him to lose.

I digress.

Today, I really, REALLY wanted the Saints to beat the Bears. Alas, it was not to be. The Saints were sloppy, turnovers and penalties. (What happened? Was it a lack of preparation? Did George Bush have something to do with it? Did FEMA screw up?)

Actually, I think you must give credit where credit is due -- the Bears' defense is a superior force and they eventually wore down the Saints.

As it turns out, it will be the Bears v. the Colts, both teams coached by African-Americans.

When I heard that the Colts would be the Bears' opponent, I was glad that New England wouldn't be returning for another shot at the championship. I was happy for the Colts and their fans.


I admit that I didn't think about Tony Dungy's skin color.

Was I supposed to?

I think I was. The media are telling me I should be thinking about it.


(AP) -- Two good friends who happen to be NFL coaches are already front-and-center in this Super Bowl, and kickoff is still two weeks away.

Lovie Smith became the first black head coach to make it all the way to the NFL's marquee game Sunday when his Chicago Bears won the NFC championship.

About four hours later, his pal and mentor, Tony Dungy, joined him there when his Indianapolis Colts took the AFC title.

For the first time in the big game's 41-year history, not one, but two black head coaches will be on the sidelines.

"It means a lot," Dungy said after a 38-34 victory over the New England Patriots. "I'm very proud to represent African-American coaches."

...Smith and Dungy are breaking new ground for black coaches in the league, much like Washington's Doug Williams did for black quarterbacks in the 1988 Super Bowl.

"Being the first black coach to lead this team, of course our players knew about it, and they wanted to help us make history," Smith said. "So I feel blessed to be in that position."

Smith was one of Dungy's assistants when the two were with Tampa Bay from 1996-2000, and they established a friendship that has grown in the years since. Now, the two buddies will go to the Super Bowl — with the chance to win a championship.

"We have to play someone, and, in my perfect world, I would like to see the Colts be that team," Smith said after the Bears won. "Tony Dungy has done an awful lot for our game. He hasn't had a chance to coach in the Super Bowl. I would love to see it."

Now everyone will get that chance.

When Dungy started in Tampa, there were just three black head coaches in the NFL.

This season, there were seven. Now, there will be two in the Super Bowl.

...Smith and Dungy already have sealed a huge victory for minority coaches, regardless of who brings home a championship.

"I'm happy for both coaches," Colts defensive end Dwight Freeney said. "I hope we get to the point we don't have to hear about it."

Exactly! Wouldn't it be nice if race didn't play in to this?

Why should anyone be shocked that teams coached by African Americans are in the Super Bowl?

I think it's too bad that it's a big deal.

Aren't we past that point?

Apparently not.

Upon being reminded, repeatedly, that Super Bowl XLI would be significant for its racial composition, I wondered whether both Smith and Dungy are really black and not pretenders like some other African Americans.

Are they black with an
asterisk, like Clarence Thomas?

Are they
Uncle Tom blacks, like Michael Steele?

Will they be pelted with Oreos?

I haven't heard about any of that sort of stuff when it comes to Smith and Dungy. I guess African Americans in the NFL are REAL representatives of their race.

As I said before, Smith seems like a nice man.


Nothing personal against him, but I'll be cheering for the Colts. I hope Tony Dungy is the winning coach. I don't want Lovie Smith and his Bears to take the title.

Does that make me a racist?


I hope not. I'm not a racist. I'm a Packers fan.