Showing posts with label Ground Zero Mosque. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ground Zero Mosque. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Obama's Head: No Sikh Temple Visit

The politically calculating Obama won't visit a Sikh temple in India because he'd have to cover his head.

Obama is the president of the United States.

Why is he doing what he views as personally politically expedient instead of behaving like the leader of the Free World?

He's incredibly selfish and insecure. He lacks a spine.

From the New York Times:

The Golden Temple, a sprawling and serene complex of gleaming gold and polished marble that is the spiritual center of the Sikh religion, is one of India’s most popular tourist attractions. Revered by Indians of all faiths, it is a cherished emblem of India’s religious diversity. So it was no surprise when the gold-plated marvel was promoted as the likely third stop on President Obama’s visit to India, scheduled for early November.

But the United States has ruled out a Golden Temple visit, according to an American official involved in planning. Temple officials said that American advance teams had gone to Amritsar, the holy city that is the site of the temple, to discuss a possible visit. But the plan appears to have foundered on the thorny question of how Mr. Obama would cover his head, as Sikh tradition requires, while visiting the temple.

“To come to golden temple he needs to cover his head,” said Dalmegh Singh, secretary of the committee that runs the temple. “That is our tradition.”

Mr. Obama, a Christian, has struggled to fend off persistent rumors that he is a Muslim, and Sikhs in the United States have often been mistaken for Muslims.

...The Golden Temple is a popular stop for famous visitors. In 1997 the Queen of England padded around the glittering temple in her stocking feet. Another kind of royalty, the scion of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty that controls India’s Congress Party, Rahul Gandhi has also been to the temple. He sipped tea from a metal bowl there, sitting on the ground like every other visitor, head draped as temple tradition demands. Last year Canada’s prime minister, Stephen Harper, also covered his head when he visited the temple.

For Mr. Obama, who will be seeking to cement the crucial but sometimes testy relationship between two of the world’s biggest democracies, the temple was one of several possible backdrops intended to convey America’s kinship with India. Mr. Obama will visit Mumbai and New Delhi.

H. S. Phoolka, a prominent Sikh lawyer in New Delhi, said he was disappointed that Mr. Obama would not visit the temple.

“We have worked so hard to establish in America that Sikhs have a very different identity than Muslims,” Mr. Phoolka said. “It is very unfortunate that even the White House is conveying the message that there is no difference between Muslims and Sikhs.”

This is crazy on a number of fronts.

It's nuts that Obama refuses to be seen with his head covered when visiting a temple in India that requires it. The stubborn Obama prefers to skip the visit. Not good.

Throughout this article lies the message that there's something wrong with being Muslim.

Whatever you do, don't confuse Sikhs with Muslims. Sikhs - good. Muslims - bad. Don't look like a Muslim!

Also, Obama is the guy who has preached about religious tolerance, stating that there should be a mosque at Ground Zero; yet he won't wear the appropriate attire when visiting a temple in a foreign country. It's so hypocritical.

He's not setting a very good example in terms of outreach.

Obama lacks courage. He doesn't do the right thing.

He should go to the temple and cover his head. He shouldn't be afraid. It's sending a terrible message, that he's a self-centered wimp.

Covering his head for a few minutes isn't the end of the world. Wouldn't it be a great opportunity for a teaching moment?

Obama is not showing the proper respect for his hosts in India. And he's saying that he'd rather diss them than be taken for a Muslim. There's a lot wrong with that.

Obama is very skilled at simultaneously insulting diverse groups. Quite a talent.

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar, Bill O'Reilly - Muslims and 9/11 (Video)

On The View, Bill O'Reilly's comments about the Ground Zero mosque, 9/11, and Muslims prompted Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Behar to storm off the set.

O'Reilly asserted that people don't want a mosque at Ground Zero because Muslims killed us on 9/11.

Barbara Walters was really angry. She was pissed off at her colleagues for screaming and walking out. She said it should not have happened. She also was disturbed with the audience for cheering Goldberg and Behar's protest, explaining that people should be able to disagree and still discuss an issue.

Walters then directed her controlled anger at O'Reilly. She got O'Reilly to apologize and clarify the distinction between Muslims and Muslim extremists.

Goldberg and Behar returned to the set after O'Reilly's clarification.


Video.


Good grief.

I can barely stand watching this 3 minute clip. I don't know how people can stand watching the entire show on a daily basis.

Sunday, September 26, 2010

SNL: Ground Zero Mosque, Gay Wedding

The perfect venue for your gay wedding?

The mosque at Ground Zero!




Note this ad was brought to you by the Republican National Committee and 70% of the Democratic National Committee.

Monday, September 20, 2010

Michael Moore and Bill Maher, McDonald's and Ground Zero

The angry, twisted Michael Moore and like-minded Bill Maher enjoyed some laughs about Ground Zero, McDonald's, and the victims of 9/11.

This is what Leftists find amusing.


Video.


Transcript

MICHAEL MOORE: Why don't we have words for people like Gingrich and Palin? You know, because they're essentially our moolahs, you know, our Taliban. We don't, we don't really ever refer to them as... but we should start calling them Cleric Gingrich and Moolah Taliban Palin, or whatever. See how that fits. Because I think that their level of bigotry is so un-American and I just, I just, um, you know, here's my question to the 70 percent who don't want [the Ground Zero mosque] built there: They don't want it two blocks from Ground Zero so how far away is enough? Four blocks? Eight blocks? Where is the Muslim-free zone? Just give me the idea of where the parameter is.

BILL MAHER: Well, this guy Paladino, this guy Paladino said it -- wherever the cloud dust went.

MOORE: Yeah, well, you know, the sad thing about that, Bill, is that there were over 60 Muslim-Americans who perished in those towers.

MAHER: All right, it's a comedy show. Anyway, um, let me turn your question around and ask...

MOORE: The only way to get a Muslim-free zone there is for Palin to raise those Muslims up from the dead and then move them out of there because their ashes are still there on Ground Zero.

MAHER: Well, enough uh... Enough comedy.

MOORE: Hey, how about that McDonald's two blocks from Ground Zero, Bill? That's killed more people than the 19 hijackers.

Sick.

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Leno: Eiffel Tower Mosque

JAY LENO: This was kind of scary yesterday. This is the age we live in. The Eiffel Tower was evacuated because of a bomb threat. I don't want to say who phoned in the threat, but they also said, 'Hey, after it's gone can we put a mosque there?'

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Bill Maher and Jay Leno, September 13 (Video)

Bill Maher was Jay Leno's guest on the Tonight Show on Monday.

Not again!

I guess it has been quite a few months but that's too soon for me.

Leno said that in the past when Maher was on the show, they used to get complaints. But now, the reaction to Maher's appearances is positive. People agree with him and realize that he's right.

Oh, good grief.

I doubt that Americans have come around to share Maher's views. I think Leno has just lost a good portion of his audience that's repulsed by Maher.

Leno has really chucked his middle of the road persona. He's out of the closet as a dyed-in-the-wool liberal.

(Before Maher's segment, I had the joy of seeing Tom Barrett's disgusting commercial about being beat up leaving State Fair last summer. Could it get any worse?)

Maher was on the show to hawk his new DVD, a comedy special, and Real Time on HBO returning this Friday. But of course Maher really was wallowing in having a forum on network TV to spew his opinions which are supposed to pass for entertainment.

After Maher mentioned that he gets high before the show, and before getting into his offensive material, Leno mentioned that Maher is getting a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame on Tuesday.

I suppose that's fitting, given the sorry state of Hollywood.

As usual, Leno fed Maher prearranged topics and allowed him to be as demeaning as he wanted to be.

First, Leno brought up the Ground Zero mosque, what Leno called "this Islamic center near Ground Zero." (Does Leno work for AP?)

Video.


Bill Maher


Bill Maher, continued


Transcript

BILL MAHER: Well, if you want me to talk about this, let me get it all out because I got into trouble talking about this subject before, so I want to get all my points. My first point about that would be I am against a mosque at Ground Zero.

(Audience cheers and applauds)

I said let me get it out! I am also against a mosque anywhere. I'm against a church anywhere or a Hindu temple or a synagogue.

(Only some applause)

See, there are people out there like this who understand. These are houses of worship which mean there are places where people go to retell nonsense stories from a time before men understood what a germ or an atom was or where the sun went at night. They try to telepathically communicate with their imaginary friend. There are places, these are places that fleece people and scare people and they perpetuate mass delusion. We shouldn't build any of them. But...

JAY LENO: That being said...

MAHER: That being said...

LENO: Let me finish...

MAHER: Right, but I'm not wrong. But people are going to still build houses of worship so they should be able to build them anywhere. There's a thing in this country called the First Amendment. And if somebody ever read it to Sarah Palin she would understand that you're supposed to be allowed to worship whatever fairy tale you want to wherever you want to. That's why we have churches and mosques and synagogues in Utah. And any religion should be able to do that, just because there are some people in the religion who are violent, anti-Semitic, and hate women -- Mel Gibson is allowed to build a church so should Islam.

LENO: Right, right.

MAHER: But one more point-

LENO: I just love the fact that you questioned my intro before, and now they're all going, 'Oh, I see what Jay was talking about.'

MAHER: But let me also say this, 'cause I was watching MSNBC, the liberal network, a few weeks ago. And they were all going nuts. Everybody on there -- and I like the people on their station -- they were all going nuts about the fact that there was a poll that said Republicans think that Islam is more likely to lead to violence. Yeah, I'm with that. They are. OK? That's the truth, too. They have nuts and we have nuts. Their nuts are a lot more numerous and a lot more violent. That mouthbreather down in Florida who was gonna burn a Quran -- what would have happened? Nothing. To retaliate, you know, they could have burned our most sacred book, Eat Pray Love. They could have burned the Bible and nothing would have happened.

LENO: Right.

MAHER: OK? So, I mean, you have to recognize that difference, too. They keep their women in beekeeper suits.

Sarah Palin is an evil dingbat who thinks God opens doors. She never tried to kill anybody for eloping which is what they did in Afghanistan a few weeks ago, 'cause in her family everybody elopes.

Why such hate for religion? Why such anger? Maher is still on his anti-God crusade.

Why such hate for Sarah Palin? The Left's obsession with her is so weird.

After the break, the topic was Obama and his religion.

Interesting that Maher doesn't mock Obama for his Christian faith. Obama clings to his Bible. Well, actually, I think he clings to his Blackberry as his source of spiritual reading.

LENO: Now President Obama's the president for a year and a half yet something like one out of every five Americans still think he's a Muslim.

MAHER: No, no, Jay. You got it wrong. Not 'still think.' That number is increasing. That's what's scary about it, a year ago, and before he was president, a less number. You'd think the more he was president the more people would get the truth. It's very sad how in the information age, you cannot get information into people's heads. As long as you write something on the Internet and do not add 'lol,' it is true.

LENO: Right.

MAHER: I'm not sure he's a Christian. I'm not sure he's a mammal, Jay. He could be a werewolf. No but, I mean, you have to understand that there is now two subsets of crazy conservatives. There's the 'birthers' - Any birthers here? - people who don't think he was born in America because they don't know Hawaii is a state. And now the people, I call them 'churchers.' These are the people who don't think he is a Christian even though he continually professes it, even though two years ago - remember when they were screaming about his Christian minister, Rev. Wright? Right, he was too much of a Christian two years ago. Now they're saying he was actually a secret Muslim. That is one undercover brother, Jay. I have to say, I mean, wow.

Could Maher be more screwed up about Obama and the Rev. Wright controversy? It wasn't about being "too much of a Christian."

Then it was on to the Tea Party and immigration.

LENO: How do you think this Tea Party will affect the midterm elections?

MAHER: Ah, the Tea Party, the nativist bed-wetters who somehow control our national dialogue. Yes, I call them the Pee Party, Jay, because they're always peeing in their pants about something. They're just, they're afraid of a mosque being built in New York. They're afraid of guns.

You know, they think Obama, who like every other pussy Democrat has never said a single word about gun control, but they are very sure that he and his Negro army are coming after their guns.

You know what? If you think that he's coming after your guns, you need to get out of your chat room and have your house tested for lead. He's not coming after your guns or your Bible or your fishing pole or your chewing tobacco. And there's not a monster under your bed. That's the Ab Lounger you ordered and never used.

So, but yeah, mosques, guns... Did you see that the governor of Arizona was talking about the fact that illegals are conducting beheadings?

LENO: Yeah, there was no... Yeah, that was nothing. Yeah.

MAHER: It's just, they're just afraid of everything. Beheadings? John McCain said illegals are purposely causing car accidents. Lou Dobbs used to say they're bringing in leprosy. I've had a gardener for 25 years in LA, I never saw one time his arm fall off.

That's right. Don't mess with Tea Party participants' fishing poles and chewing tobacco. The Tea Party patriots are just a bunch of uneducated hicks.

Next topic: The BP oil spill.

LENO: Something I love are these commercials for BP where the guy goes, 'We're out every day looking for the oil,' like they're detectives, like they can't find it. It's not right there.

MAHER: I love the way as soon as they capped the well, immediately the oil just disappeared. It was like Jesus from the tomb. It's gone. It's a miracle. It's just magic. The oil has gone. Sorry, Jay. I know it's a tough night for the Baptists. But um, I apologize, but I mean, it is ridiculous that this oil has just disappeared. It hasn't disappeared.

Well that's an ugly load.

What's troubling to me is not Maher's greasy shtick. There are lots of people seriously on the same page as Maher. They don't see it as comedy. He's expressing their views. They hate people of faith. They hate conservatives. They consider them buffoons, racists, and enemies of their America.

Where's the tolerance, oh enlightened and brilliant Bill Maher?

Monday, September 13, 2010

Amanpour: Al Qaeda Building Ground Zero Mosque

Christiane Amanpour, on ABC's This Week, declares that opponents of the Ground Zero mosque believe that al Qaeda is building the mosque.

CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR: The opponents of this mosque lean towards that rationale, that it's al Qaeda that's building the mosque basically.

What?

The woman is clueless. It seems she's made no attempt to understand the opposition.


Video.

Reza Aslan - 'Meet the Press'

Reza Aslan is pissed off.

Video.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy



Transcript
DAVID GREGORY: I want to talk the economy, but I do want to talk about 9/11 and this tumultuous week, a surreal week in many ways, with the threats from the Florida pastor and this ongoing debate about what's going on in lower Manhattan. And, and we look at this, the views of Islam in The Washington Post poll, unfavorable now at 49 percent. Look at that, eclipsing even the unfavorable rating in October of 2001. And you look at the, the flag burnings, some of the reactions that we've seen to the debate we've been having here going on in the Middle East, in Afghanistan, in Pakistan, burning flags, you see this kind of thing. This is a hearts and minds campaign that General Petraeus is waging in Afghanistan and elsewhere in Pakistan, and there are setbacks to it.

Reza, you wrote this as part of an NPR commentary at the end of the summer, "The fear is that this [Islamaphobia] may lead to the same kind of radicalization among Muslim youth in the U.S. that we've seen in Europe. It has already played into the hands of al-Qaeda, which has for years been trying to convince American Muslims that the unfettered religious freedoms they enjoy is a mirage. ... Are we in danger of proving al-Qaeda right? I am a liberal, progressive, secularized American Muslim. But when I see that bigotry against my faith - my very identity - has become so commonplace in America that it is shaping into a wedge issue for the midterm elections, I can barely control my anger. I can't imagine how the next generation of American Muslim youth will react to such provocations." What's behind this?

REZA ASLAN: Well, look, I think part of it has to do with the controversy surrounding the Islamic community center in lower Manhattan. And while it's true that there are those who oppose the project because they do believe that it will disturb the sensitivities of some 9/11 victims--though I, I, I do want to remind everyone that in this country we do not define our constitutional rights by how they disturb people's sensitivities--you only had to spend a few minutes at Ground Zero yesterday and to take in this international cabal of anti-Muslim zealots that had gathered together to spout the most vile racist bigotry to know that this is about something more. Anti-Muslim sentiment in this country is at unprecedented levels. We all know this. But what's truly disturbing is how mainstream it's becoming with politicians on both sides--and I would have to include the former mayor in this, in this category--openly and explicitly associating American Muslims with al-Qaeda. I mean, what I'd like to know from, not just the former mayor but from, you know, the people who, who keep talking about this Islamic community center, is that what is it that this multifaith, multistoried community center being led by an American imam that two presidents, Republican and Democrat, have used as a--as an ambassador to the Muslim world, cultural ambassador to the Muslim world, what does that have to do with al-Qaeda? The answer is kind of simple, actually: Islam. But let's call a spade a spade for a moment. If you are painting 1.5 billion people with the same brush of violence and, and, and extremism, you're a bigot. And I think what's, what's disturbing is the way that that's become part of the, the, the natural discourse now.

"[I]nternational cabal of anti-Muslim zealots that had gathered together to spout the most vile racist bigotry"?

Wow.

Aslan doesn't hesitate to paint those at the protest in opposition to the Ground Zero mosque with the same brush. He's not drawing any distinctions.

No, he has no problem calling all the protesters bigots.

Furthermore, Aslan doesn't have a problem insinuating that bigotry underlies most any opposition to the Ground Zero mosque.

He wants to call a spade a spade. OK, let's call a spade a spade.

Is this "Islamic community center in lower Manhattan" that Aslan talks about really a "community center"?

That implies it will be a place where ALL in the community are welcome and accepted. Can Jews and Christians and other infidels freely use the facilities without restrictions? Will they be allowed to freely roam ALL the spaces in the center? Will it be like the Y?

Aslan also doesn't acknowledge the views of those behind the project. For example, Feisal Abdul Rauf is on the record as being unwilling to label Hamas a terrorist organization.

Some Americans are uncomfortable with that.

Then, there's the issue of funding. What's the source of the money to build it? Will it come from terrorist groups or groups that bankroll terrorists?

Especially when we're talking about Ground Zero, those are legitimate questions.

I think Aslan is being disingenuous or he's blinded by his own zealotry.

Either way, it's bad.

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Geert Wilders: Ground Zero Mosque Speech (Video)

Geert Wilders, the controversial Dutch lawmaker behind the controversial film, "Fitna," delivered a speech at a rally against the Ground Zero mosque yesterday.

Related posts on Geert Wilders:

Fitna

Watch Geert Wilders' Film: Fitna

Dutch Court Rules on Geert Wilders and "Fitna"

Video of Wilders' speech.



I think it's unfortunate that the outrage over the Ground Zero mosque and the outrage over Terry Jones and those of his ilk weren't put aside on the observance of the ninth anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

For that one day, I wish the protests and divisions would have been replaced by just a few hours of unity and solemn remembrance, as well as clear condemnation of the barbaric actions of the terrorists.

Surely, all reasonable people can find common ground and stand in solidarity, without reservation, against the intentional slaughter of 3000 innocents.

Friday, September 10, 2010

Terry Jones: Inconsequential Loon

Terry Jones has received more than his fifteen minutes of fame.

The guy has managed to get the world hanging on his every word. Even Obama got involved and commented on his stunt.

What is going on here?

From the New York Times:

First, Terry Jones, the Florida pastor who set the world on edge with plans to burn copies of the Koran on Sept. 11, said Thursday that he had canceled his demonstration because he had won a promise to move the proposed Islamic center near ground zero to a new location.

Then, hours later, after learning that the project’s leaders in New York had said that no such deal existed, Mr. Jones backed away from his promise and said the bonfire of sacred texts was simply “suspended.”

The sudden back and forth suggested that the controversy — the pastor drew pointed criticisms from President Obama and an array of leaders, officials and celebrities in the United States and abroad — was not yet finished even after multiple appearances before the news media on the lawn of his small church.

Mr. Jones seemed to be struggling with how to save face and hold on to the spotlight he has attracted for an act that could make him a widely reviled figure.

But Mr. Jones seemed to have been wrong or misled from the start.

Minutes after he announced the cancellation alongside Imam Muhammad Musri, a well-known Islamic leader in Florida who had been trying to broker a deal, Mr. Musri contradicted Mr. Jones’s account. He said that Muslim leaders of the project in New York had not actually agreed to find a new location. “The imam committed to meet with us but did not commit to moving the mosque yet,” Mr. Musri said.

Even that may not be accurate. Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, the leader of the New York project, said in a statement that he had not spoken to Mr. Jones or Mr. Musri, who said later that he received the pledge of a meeting from a staff member in Mr. Abdul Rauf’s office.

The saga of Mr. Jones appeared likely to continue — with more pressure likely to come as well. In just the past week, the list of his critics had come to include Mr. Obama, the Vatican, Franklin Graham, Angelina Jolie, Sarah Palin, dozens of members of Congress and Gen. David H. Petraeus, who was among the first to declare that the burning of Korans would put Americans soldiers and civilians in danger.

That risk of violence seemed to be rising, as large protests against Mr. Jones were staged over the past week in Kabul, Afghanistan, and Jakarta, Indonesia. It led the Obama administration to work furiously to end Mr. Jones’s plans.

This is insane.

A pastor with a 50-member church in Florida is attracting worldwide attention.

WHY?

Why not ignore him and dismiss him as the nutcase that he is?

We know that in the Muslim world groups are always gathering to burn American flags and chant "Death to America" and "Death to Christians." It seems to be a favorite pastime over there. Thousands take part, but there's no concern whatsoever about inflaming the Western world. They don't care about offending us.

But here we have the doofus Jones and if he takes a match to a Quran, World War Whatever may break out.

It's crazy.

This is being fed by the media. The New York Times reports on Jones' latest statements and plans while it questions the media's role in the saga.

A renegade pastor and his tiny flock set fire to a Koran on a street corner, and made sure to capture it on film. And they were ignored.

That stunt took place in 2008, involving members of the Westboro Baptist Church from Topeka, Kan., an almost universally condemned group of fundamentalists who also protest at military funerals.

But plans for a similar stunt by another fringe pastor, Terry Jones, have garnered worldwide news media attention this summer, attention that peaked Thursday when he announced he was canceling — and later, that he had only “suspended” — what he had dubbed International Burn a Koran Day. It had been scheduled for Saturday, the ninth anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Unlike the Koran-burning by Westboro Baptist, Mr. Jones’s planned event in Gainesville, Fla., coincided with the controversy over the proposed building of a Muslim community center in Lower Manhattan near ground zero and a simmering summerlong debate about the freedoms of speech and religion.

Mr. Jones was able to put himself at the center of those issues by using the news lull of summer and the demands of a 24-hour news cycle to promote his anti-Islam cause. He said he consented to more than 150 interview requests in July and August, each time expressing his extremist views about Islam and Sharia law.

By the middle of this week, the planned Koran burning was the lead story on some network newscasts, and topic No. 1 on cable news — an extraordinary amount of attention for a marginal figure with a very small following. On Thursday, President Obama condemned Mr. Jones’s plan, and his press secretary, Robert Gibbs, said that there were “more people at his press conferences than listen to his sermons,” in a bit of media criticism.

...The episode has given rise to at least a little soul-searching within news organizations. Chris Cuomo, an ABC News anchor, wrote Thursday afternoon on Twitter, “I am in the media, but think media gave life to this Florida burning ... and that was reckless.”

Yeah, it was really lame.

I suspect that on a daily basis the Bible is burned in protest in this country and around the world more often than the Quran.

The numbers don't matter. What matters is that the Jones case has been blown out of proportion and nearly into an international crisis.

Thank you, media. Good work!

It's nuts. Who is Terry Jones that he should be receiving this sort of attention?

Obviously, Jones doesn't really care about burning the Quran. He cares about satisfying his ego. Period.

Jones is like Richard Heene, orchestrator of the balloon boy hoax. They're media whores at heart, and the media are drawn to whores like moths to flames.

A protest doesn't have to be a media event, let alone a worldwide media event.

As an American, Jones and his flock can quietly burn Qurans. As long as he doesn't violate any fire codes or other regulations, he's good to go. End of story.

But Jones didn't want it to stop there, and I don't think the media wanted it to stop either until the whole thing started to snowball out of control and they realized how foolish it had all become. Plus, there was that added factor of the possibility of violence and death thanks to Muslim radicals being in the mix. Not good.

Now there's a lot of embarrassment to go around.

I think it's time for Jones to be stripped of his all-powerful monster status and sent back to being just another inconsequential loon.

Note: You can burn whatever book you want and there won't be any problem. Just don't alert the media or hold press conferences or post a recording of the event on the Internet.

Thursday, September 9, 2010

Burning Qurans and Building a Mosque

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Editorial Board opposes the planned protest by Terry Jones and his church, the Dove World Outreach Center in Florida. On the anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Jones and his group will burn Qurans.

The Board declares that action to be "un-Christian" and "just plain wrong." But it doesn't stop there. The JS Editorial Board goes on to equate Jones' protest with the many Americans opposed to the Ground Zero mosque.

Jones undeniably has a First Amendment right to burn books, holy or otherwise. But, as the saying goes, just because there is a right doesn't make it right. And it doesn't mean a single news camera has to show up.

This burning would be wrong even if no troops were endangered.

Earlier, there was the deep resistance to an Islamic center near ground zero. Why? Well, because it's insensitive and represents caving in to radical Islam, we're told. How is it insensitive? This remains vague. But polling does show lack of support for the center. Which proves, yes, "the people" can be wrong.

This center is insensitive only if one can blame all Muslims for the fanaticism of some Muslims. But by this measure, Jones' actions would constitute good reason for all of Islam to believe the fiction that all Christians hate them. And that, of course, is nonsense. There is a reason Jones has only 50 followers and why the vast majority of Muslims aren't terrorists. Bankrupt ideas are hard sells.

Clueless.

The Board declares insensitivity about building a mosque at Ground Zero "remains vague."

No, it doesn't. There's nothing vague about it. It's wrong to give radical Islam another victory. Weren't the murders of 3,000 innocents enough? Why be OK with a mosque so very near to the site of the slaughter? Why not care about the feelings of the surviving victims of 9/11, the loved ones of the dead, and their pain?

There's nothing vague about that.

It would be hateful and intolerant and unconstitutional to ban mosques in the U.S. and prevent all Muslims here from practicing their faith because of the actions of the radicals. That's not happening.

Book burning, even holy book burning, isn't close to being the moral equivalent of committing mass murder on an enormous scale.

The JS Editorial Board fails to grasp the difference, preferring instead to take the example of Jones' intolerance to accuse the people opposed to the Ground Zero mosque as being similarly intolerant and recruiters for radical Islam. That's as wrong as it is cruel.

Disgracefully, the Board has the nerve to rule that burning Qurans AND opposing the Ground Zero mosque is "un-Christian." That's a terribly inflammatory and unfair swipe.

Moreover, since when did the Board become concerned with the Christian thing to do?

It has shown such a lack of respect for Christianity, in particular, the Catholic Church, so frequently blaming the Church for the sins/crimes of a very few.

...The pastor, having already confirmed the false suspicions of many Muslims with his intentions, should reconsider. It would be the Christian thing to do.

Why would Jones reconsider when he's being given so much attention? He's feeding off the publicity and enjoying the power the media and government and military officials continue to give to this little man.

I suspect that dramatically more Bibles and American flags are burned in protest in this country and around the world every day than what Jones and his minuscule group of followers intend to set aflame on Saturday.

One more thing--

Isn't it twisted that the JS Editorial Board, defender of free speech, is exhibiting concern regarding Jones' protest endangering our troops when it has its own lengthy record of taking positions that have done exactly that?

The same goes for Obama.

Bottom line: This editorial lacks focus and consistency and sense.

Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf: Build the Mosque or Be Attacked

Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, the man who insists on building a mosque at Ground Zero, was interviewed by Soledad O'Brien last night on Larry King Live.

Even though most Americans oppose the location of the mosque, Rauf is not reconsidering his plans. In fact, he's amped up his rhetoric.

The latest from Rauf boils down to this: If that mosque is not built at his chosen location, we'll be attacked.


Video



Transcript

SOLEDAD O'BRIEN: When did you settle upon this location, which is just about two blocks north of Ground Zero, for your new Islamic cultural center? Why that particular spot?

IMAM FEISAL ABDUL RAUF: Well, first, I must remind everybody that I have been imam of a mosque just 10 blocks from that spot, 12 blocks from Ground Zero. I've been serving that community and that neighborhood for the last quarter of a century.

When 9/11 happened, we couldn't reach our mosque in the Tribeca area. You know, and finally we came back. There was flower, letters. We're part of this community. I've served this community. And this is a community that I have worked for so long. And is important for us as Muslims, as Muslims who are in Lower Manhattan, to want to give back to the city and the country that's given us so much.

O'BRIEN: So why that particular spot?

RAUF: Well, what happened was Sharif Gamal, the owner of Soho Properties, a member of my congregation, has noticed how our -- the need for prayer space has expanded. He felt a commitment to do something for his community. And he found this particular building. And he negotiated it, acquired it, and offered it for us to use and to establish a center that would be the space for a vision that I've had for over a decade, or 15, almost 20 years, which is to establish a space which embodies the fundamental beliefs that we have as Jews, Christians, and Muslims, which is to love our god and to love our neighbor, to build a space where we'll have a culture of worship. And at the same time, get to know each other and to forge personal bonds because that's how society, how community, is built, and how we can create something that will snowball to push back against the radical discourse that has just hijacked the discourse in our country and in much of the world.

O'BRIEN: What's been created has snowballed a little bit. There's a lot of anger and hostility at that site. And there are many people who have said, why not just go somewhere else?

RAUF: I understand the sensitivity of the people. I really do. And I'm very, very concerned about it. We've reached out and are still reaching out to 9/11 families.

O'BRIEN: Did you reach out to them before?

RAUF: Yes.

O'BRIEN: To all the families?

RAUF: Not to all the families, but to as many as we could reach, especially those who are very concerned about this issue.

O'BRIEN: Before you started the proposal?

RAUF: No, not before we started, but once this thing happened. I need to remind the audience that this story first broke last December in "The New York Times." It was a front page article in "The New York Times." And no one objected. This controversy only began in May. And it began as a result of some politicians, who decided to use this for certain political purposes. And this is when it began to snowball, Soledad.

O'BRIEN: So you think it's been politicized?

RAUF: Absolutely. This is very dangerous and tragic for two reasons.

Reason number one is that it goes against the fundamental American principle of separation of church and state. This concept of separation of religion and politics or church and state has a wisdom behind it. And the purpose behind it is not to politicize religion. Because when you politicize religion, it is dangerous.

O'BRIEN: But ultimately, when you look at the polls, something like 71 percent of Americans think that even though there's a right to build there, a center that will include a mosque and other things, which we'll talk about in a minute, the wisdom of it may not be there.

RAUF: Well, here's the--

O'BRIEN: Is that political?

RAUF: Well, here--

O'BRIEN: Or is that just people saying it's sensitivity wise, it's the wrong thing to do?

RAUF: I am extremely concerned about sensitivity. But I also have a responsibility. If we move from that location, the story will be that the radicals have taken over the discourse. The headlines in the Muslim world will be that Islam is under attack. And I'm less concerned about the radicals in America than I'm concerned about the radicals in the Muslim world.

O'BRIEN: But isn't that also saying you're less concerned about the voices of opposition here?

RAUF: And if we do -- no, no, no, no. I'm sorry, I don't mean it that way. I meant it, the danger from the radicals in the Muslim world to our national security, to the national security of our troops.

I have a niece who works in the Army and served in Iraq. The concern for American citizens who live and work and travel overseas will increasingly be compromised if the radicals are strengthened. And if we do move, it will strengthen the argument of the radicals to recruit, their ability to recruit, and their increasing aggression and violence against our country.

O'BRIEN: There are Ground Zero families that I've spoken to who are on all sides of the debate. I mean, they're not of one voice, as you well know. They've said, but what about me? I can't find my son's body. And they want to build a mosque on a spot where he might be.

RAUF: Well, first of all, this is not the -- this is not that spot. This is not Ground Zero proper. This is--

O'BRIEN: It's two blocks.

RAUF: Yes. No one's body is in that location. I'm very sensitive to those feelings. As an imam, as any religious person does, we have to minister to the pain and hurt of our congregations and our ministry and our communities. And it is part of our intention.

This is why we're reaching out more to 9/11 families. We would like to have a memorial in this center for 9/11 families. Congregations and our ministry and our communities. And it is part of our intention. This is why we're reaching out to 9/11 families. We would like to have a memorial in this center for 9/11 families. We have not finalized all our plans yet. We are willing to sit down and engage and do something that will help us heal. You cannot heal a trauma by walking away from it. We have to sit down. We have to talk about it. We have to dialogue about it and find a way to move through it and beyond it.

Suddenly, Rauf is concerned about our national security. He says that moving the mosque will mean radicals will have a recruitment tool because the headlines in the Muslim world will read that Islam is under attack.

In terms of sensitivity to the voices of opposition, Rauf says, "I'm less concerned about the radicals in America than I'm concerned about the radicals in the Muslim world."

So, a mosque in that location is necessary to avoid increasing violence against our troops and our country.

That's a sleazy threat, an attempt to make the vast majority of Americans against the mosque there feel guilty. It's an effort to make Americans give in to the demands of radicals.

To me, that's not a winning argument.

If anything, Rauf is providing a reason to move it.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Burn a Quran Protest

Protesters in Kabul, Afghanistan are angry about the plans of a small church in Gainesville, Florida to burn Qurans on September 11, 2010.

Pastor Terry Jones is the leader of Dove World Outreach Center, a 50-member church.

In Afghanistan, the proposed actions of a group of 50 people warrant chants of "Death to America."

To express their outrage, the protesters in Kabul burned an American flag and a cardboard effigy of Jones.


Video.


"Muslims consider the Quran the word of God and demand it be treated with the utmost respect.

"The U.S. embassy in Kabul issued a statement condemning the church's plans, saying Washington was deeply concerned about deliberate attempts to offend religious or ethnic groups."

I would never take part in "Burn a Quran" Day. I find it offensive and disrespectful.

I also find the burning of the American flag offensive and disrespectful. "Death to America" chants certainly are a deliberate attempt to offend Americans.

But we have freedom of speech. Although I don't think Terry Jones is exercising it responsibly, it's his right to burn Qurans.

However, having the right to do something doesn't mean it's the right thing to do.

For example, millions of Americans find the plans for the Ground Zero mosque to be disturbing, but those plans are being defended by Obama. The president of the United States isn't condemning the insensitivity of the developers and supporters of the mosque. To the contrary, he and those of his ilk are calling people against the Ground Zero mosque Islamophobic and haters.

Can you imagine the U.S. embassy in Kabul issuing a statement condemning the Muslims' protest in Kabul, saying Washington was deeply concerned about deliberate attempts to offend Americans?

I can't.

Respect isn't a one-way street.

I think these protesters in Afghanistan need to reach out to Terry Jones and his church. Perhaps instead of lashing out, they need to examine what makes the Gainesville church members so angry that they plan to burn Qurans. They need to look at what they did to bring about this rage.

The protesters should try to understand Terry Jones and his flock, and apologize for mistakes made by the Muslim nation throughout its history.

Friday, September 3, 2010

Donald Trump and David Letterman: Ground Zero Mosque

Speaking to David Letterman, Donald Trump makes an excellent case for the Ground Zero mosque to be moved.

Letterman, on the other hand, marches in lockstep with the liberal elite. At least he didn't call Trump an Islamophobe. It probably took a lot of self-control, something Letterman is known to lack.


Video.


NewsBusters has the transcript.

DONALD TRUMP: As far as the mosque is concerned, I think it's very insensitive to build it there. I think it's not appropriate, a I think it's insensitive and it shouldn't be built there. (Applause) [pause as Letterman frowns] I don't know if he agrees.

LETTERMAN: Well, I don't know -- I'm so ignorant about stuff. What about the notion -- I can remember, I can't remember but, remember when the pilgrims came over? Folks, remember when the pilgrims were here? And the puritans, and they came seeking religious freedom, and freedom from religious persecution, looking for religious expression. And as far as I've always known, that's a fundamental building block of what makes this country great.

TRUMP: I agree. And, you know, it's called very simply freedom of religion. And I would agree with that 100 percent. In this case, it's caused such a storm that the people doing it would make so much good will if they said, “hey, listen, we want to make everybody happy, including ourselves. We're going to pick a site that's a little further away.” Everybody would be happy... I think the mosque is a real big issue in this city and in this country and I think it's very insensitive to build it there and I think they should go someplace else. (Applause)

LETTERMAN: Insensitive, and describe for me what insensitivity is manifested if it's built there.

TRUMP: Well, I just think there's such ire. There's such -- I've never seen anything quite like it. I mean, I go by that site because I have a big building down there, 40 Wall Street, and the level of animosity and hatred and all of the things that this mosque is engendering, it's very inappropriate. And I'm like you, I believe freedom of religion, but at the same time, sometimes you have to sort of make a turn. It shouldn't be forced upon them. If they did it of their own volition it would be such a popular thing for them.

LETTERMAN: If they did what?

TRUMP: If they moved it to a different site.

LETTERMAN: The notion -- does this suggest that we are in fact officially at war with Muslims? Is that what this suggests?

TRUMP: Well, somebody knocked down the World Trade Center.

LETTERMAN: Yes. No denying that, and they were Muslims, but they weren't, it's not, how do I want to express this? We're not at -- we're at war with those people and they happen to be Muslims. We're not at war with Muslims. (Applause)

TRUMP: Well, I would say that's right, David, I would say that's right. And whether you like it or not, there's a lot of people in this country that are just absolutely -- you see the people who died in the World Trade Center, when you see their mothers and their fathers and their wives standing there just weeping and crying because of the mosque, I just think it would be a great thing if they would move it, if they would voluntarily say, “you know, we're going to move this.” I think they would engender, I mean, it would be so good for them.

LETTERMAN: Yes, but I don't believe, not having read the Koran, I don't believe that part of that belief, that pursuit is here in your face, take a look at this, what do you think? What are you going to do?

TRUMP: Well, somebody's blowing us up. I mean, somebody's blowing up buildings, and somebody's doing lots of bad stuff.

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Feisal Abdul Rauf: Marriage Counselor

The Ground Zero mosque imam, Feisal Abdul Rauf, considers himself to be playing the role of "bridge builder," a marriage counselor to work through the issues between al Qaeda and the United States. Rauf sees the U.S. and the barbaric, murderous terrorists as a quarrelling married couple.

Video.


Isn't that sweet?

Al Qaeda and the U.S. are having a lovers' spat, and Rauf wants to assist in getting the couple to kiss and make up.

Good grief.

If Rauf is sincere, he should drop his efforts to build the Ground Zero mosque and stage an immediate intervention for
Ahmed Mohamed Nasser al Soofi, of Detroit, MI, and Hezem al Murisi. Both men are from Yemen.

Two men taken off a Chicago-to-Amsterdam United Airlines flight in the Netherlands have been charged by Dutch police with "preparation of a terrorist attack," U.S. law enforcement officials tell ABC News.

U.S. officials said the two appeared to be travelling with what were termed "mock bombs" in their luggage. "This was almost certainly a dry run, a test," said one senior law enforcement official.

...The two were allowed to board the flight at O'Hare airport last night despite security concerns surrounding one of them, the officials said.

...Airport security screeners in Birmingham, Alabama first stopped al Soofi and referred him to additional screening because of what officials said was his "bulky clothing."

In addition, officials said, al Soofi was found to be carrying $7,000 in cash and a check of his luggage found a cell phone taped to a Pepto-Bismol bottle, three cell phones taped together, several watches taped together, a box cutter and three large knives. Officials said there was no indication of explosives and he and his luggage were cleared for the flight from Birmingham to Chicago O'Hare.

Rauf should be working on a bridge for Ahmed Mohamed Nasser al Soofi and Hezem al Murisi.

They appear to want to kill innocent people.

Of course, the Leftists will continue to paint people against the Ground Zero mosque as Islamophobes and racists.

And what kind of "phobes" are al Soofi and al Murisi?

Leno: Obama's Economic Plan is Health Care Plan

JAY LENO: According to a report in TIME magazine, experts say that this recession... I love when they do this. You know, they always try to make lemonade here. They say the recession is good for people because fewer people drive to work, which means fewer deaths in auto accidents. Fewer people can afford to eat so we don't gain as much weight. That's what it said. You know what that means? President Obama's economic plan is also his health care plan. It's genius! It's genius, I tell you!

More jokes on the economy--
JAY LENO: The economy is so bad today President Obama had to play golf on a public course. That's how bad it is.

JAY LENO: In fact, the only housing starts in the United States now are mosques in New York City. Those are the only housing starts at all.

Friday, August 27, 2010

ABC News: Ground Zero Mosque Wrongdoing

ABC News didn't report the story of Sunday's rally in New York protesting the Ground Zero mosque. It created a story.

Andrea S. Lafferty, Big Peace, witnessed "provocative behavior" by an ABC News staffer.

Story and photos here.

ABC News was busted. Eventually, it released a statement admitting the wrongdoing.

However, according to Lafferty, the statement from Jeffrey W. Schneider, senior vice president and spokesman for ABC News, was inadequate and deceptive. Although Schneider acknowledged there was inappropriate behavior, he misrepresented what happened and failed to be forthcoming about the ABC employees involved in the situation.

From Breitbart TV:




Where is the journalistic integrity?

ABC was at the rally to make news rather than report it.

And the mainstream media wonder why the public doesn't trust them to be fair.

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Feisal Abdul Rauf: U.S. Terrorism Fostered Islamic Terrorism

Here's more from Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf:

In 2006, Rauf said that U.S. "terrorism" is at the root of Islamic terrorism.


Video.

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Holocaust Survivor - Ground Zero Mosque Rally

A Holocaust survivor attending last Sunday's rally opposing the Ground Zero mosque was the victim of an extremely abusive supporter of the project.

The crazed man verbally assaulted the elderly man, cursing him out.

The guy certainly is not about building bridges. His hate just boils over. He can't contain it.

Would Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf approve?


Video.


Who is the hater here?

MAN WITH CAMERA: Hey, bro! Bro, how does it feel to curse out an old man who's a Holocaust survivor? How does that feel?

PRO-MOSQUE MAN: I have no problem cursing out an unpatriotic, treasonous piece of garbage that wouldn't know the G-- damn Constitution if it hit him in the f---ing face. OK? Got that?

.....

PRO-MOSQUE MAN: (Speaking to the man taping the incident) So that's how it feels, OK? Holocaust victim? You know what? Obviously he didn't learn his lesson all this time he was a Holocaust victim because right now he wants to do the same G-- damn f---ing thing to the Muslims that had to happen to him.

MAN WITH CAMERA: Oh, nobody wants to kill Muslims.

PRO-MOSQUE MAN: That is a disgusting, and obviously you're on his side. You know what? Who cares? You don't know what you're doing either, camera guy!

Oh, man.

What tolerance!

Monday, August 23, 2010

Anti-Semitism at Ground Zero Mosque Counter Protest

Daniel Halper, the Weekly Standard, relays an incident that occurred at the Ground Zero mosque counter protest.

Joey "Boots" Bassolino was documenting the counter protest when he heard something that struck him as inappropriate.

"We're not going to sit there and back these Zionist Jews."

When he took issue with the remark, exercising his right to free speech, there was a problem.

Halper writes:

At Sunday's Ground Zero mosque protest, I spoke to one man who had been with the counter-protesters, Joey “Boots” Bassolino, immediately after the police pulled him out from the crowd. What happened, I asked? “There was a guy standing up, a Pakistani guy, who had identified himself as a Pakistani, and he said: ‘We’re not going to sit there and back these Zionist Jews,’” Bassolino recounted, still clearly a little shaken up.

“And I’m like, whoa, wait a minute. What’s up with the racism? And they’re like, ‘what’s racist about that?’” The guy behind Bassolino yelled “f*** you,” reached forward, grabbing his camera and hitting it. “So I kicked him in the shin,” Bassolino said. Bassolino, a disabled U.S. army veteran, claims that he’s an “objective” observer and was in the group of counter-protesters to “document what was going on.”

“These are people that are supposedly protesting racism, yet you get people standing up there on a soap box yelling about ‘Zionist Jews.’ What the hell is that? That’s racism to me, man,” Bassolino explained to me.




joeyboots writes on YouTube:
OK so I went down to cover the protests both for and against the proposed mosque at Ground Zero and when I questioned the blatant anti-semitic racism of one of the pro-mosque supporters who was on the soap box speaking to the crowd I was yelled and cussed at and told to let him speak. One of the pro-mosque supporters then cussed me and I told him about his need for a dentist and then when I went back to filming the next speaker I was hit in the head from behind and my camera grabbed by the f-bomb dropping man, so I then kicked him and the anti-semites then turned on me quickly and to the NYPD's professionalism they were in the mix within seconds to escort me away from the turning mob of hypocrites who cry racism when speaking of those against the mosque yet promote and support it themselves. How dare I question a racist anti-semite!

This is really all so ugly.

There's so much turmoil and anger.

When is TIME going to do a cover story on anti-Semitism in America?